Abortion page 69

3076 posts

Flag Post

…… Hm. My point about what in particular?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

My point about what in particular?

The point of your question.

 
Flag Post

If it’s the one I’m thinking about, I just wanted to hear it from your point of view.

 
Flag Post

This one.

Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

…Anyway, I was wondering what all of you think about killing a pregnant person, and being charged with two murders.

And I already gave my point of view, and I don’t see the point about you miking that question, other than just so you can see what the answers would be.

 
Flag Post

Oh. Sorry. What page is that on?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

Oh. Sorry. What page is that on?

The previous one.

You could also just click the link in the name, if you want to go to the post.

 
Flag Post

I KNOW That abortion is wrong. God dosn’t want us to Kill our babies. If it will cuase damage to the mothers life, At least The babies got to see the world and go through life for its own.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Bobneson:

I KNOW That abortion is wrong.

Orly?

God dosn’t want us to Kill our babies.

Which god?

And how do you know he doesn’t want that?

If it will cuase damage to the mothers life, At least The babies got to see the world and go through life for its own.

Your a sick fuck, you do know that, right?

 
Flag Post

So your one of them athesit? Here is some proof that there is a god : You athesit Connot convert any God belivers to athesitism. We God belivers can convert some of you athesit.
How do i know that god does not want us to aport our babies? THE PLAN OF SALVATION!
Grandpa larry the monkey has some words to say to you.

 
Flag Post

…Wait a minute…

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Bobneson:

So your one of them athesit?

What’s an Athesit?

Here is some proof that there is a god : You athesit Connot convert any God belivers to athesitism.

Then explain the people who became atheists after they were religious.

We God belivers can convert some of you athesit.

That’s not proof of God, that’s proof of people believing in a religion.

How do i know that god does not want us to aport our babies?

Because he said so?

THE PLAN OF SALVATION!

Oh…

What?

Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

No, almost every mother who aborts their child feels some form of emotional pain or regret, as far as I know.

Oh, I’m sure, it’s just the second part of his post.

And when you kill a fetus “for fear of the unknown”,

Who said anything about the “fear of the unknown?”

it isn’t much different than killing it when it’s five.

It kinda is, actually.

Other than bonding… But I know that isn’t the argument – I’m sure we know this by now.

I don’t get what you mean here.

Bobneson, you know half the people on Serious Discussion are atheists, right?

He does now, at least.

 
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Bobneson:

Please throw out some more details.

What?

No really, what are you talking abut?

 
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Bobneson:

Yes, I now know that most of the people here are athesit. Which is very sad.

How? Is it because they don’t believe the “right” things?

At least Half aren’t gay, That would be even worse.

Bigot.

 
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post
Who said anything about the “fear of the unknown?”

Killing your child because you assume their life won’t be worth living is not a good excuse.

It kinds is, actually.

How? You kill it to prevent its suffering (most of the time), right? Does that mean you would be willing to kill it when it’s older, because you assume the pre-teen years will be total hell for it? Why not?

 
Flag Post
Does that mean you would be willing to kill it when it’s older, because you assume the pre-teen years will be total hell for it? Why not?

There is a gap between a fetus and an independent, functioning human, on objective and subjective levels. You have to accept this. It’s the difference between aborting plans to start a pointless, resource draining war, and discontinuing the war prematurely after it has already begun.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Bobneson:

Your the immature bigot here.

I’m not the one hating on gays her, now am I?

And I have two questions:

1. Do you know what the word “bigot” mean?

2. How?

Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

Killing your child because you assume their life won’t be worth living is not a good excuse.

There are some situations where you don’t have to assume, though.

 
Flag Post

There is a gap between a fetus and an independent, functioning human, on objective and subjective levels. You have to accept this. It’s the difference between aborting plans to start a pointless, resource draining war, and discontinuing the war prematurely after it has already begun.

So killing your 5-year-old is wrong just because it would be a waste of five years? How about two? I don’t like that you compared it to a war.

There are some situations where you don’t have to assume, though.

I’m not talking about that at the moment. You support the right to do this even when it is just an assumption?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by ILoveFishsticks:

Not funny, Fishsticks.

Originally posted by Bobneson:
Grandpa larry the monkey has some words to say to you.

Who the eff is grandpa larry the monkey?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Twilight_Ninja:
Originally posted by ILoveFishsticks:

Not funny, Fishsticks.

I think he knows.

I’m not talking about that at the moment. You support the right to do this even when it is just an assumption?

Even if it is an assumption, it would still be fairly accurate in a few, general scenarios.

Originally posted by Twilight_Ninja:

Who the eff is grandpa larry the monkey?

I think it might be the voice inside his head, that no-one else can hear.

 
Flag Post

…Why don’t you quit arguing with the troll, anyway?

I’m not talking about that at the moment. You support the right to do this even when it is just an assumption?

Even if it is an assumption, it would still be fairly accurate in a few, general scenarios.

“Fairly” accurate shouldn’t be worth the risk by ending his/her life. It doesn’t make killing it “noble”.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

…Why don’t you quit arguing with the troll, anyway?

Because possibilities.

“Fairly” accurate shouldn’t be worth the risk by ending his/her life.

Save one life any ruin two others? Awesome idea!

It doesn’t make killing it “noble”.

Who said anything about being “noble?”