What does this mean for me? You will always be able to play your favorite games on Kongregate. However, certain site features may suddenly stop working and leave you with a severely degraded experience.
What should I do? We strongly urge all our users to upgrade to modern browsers for a better experience and improved security.
We suggest you install the latest version of one of these browsers:
Kongregate is a community-driven browser games portal with an open platform for all web games.
Get your games in front of thousands of users while monetizing through ads and virtual goods.
Learn more »
I feel like making this due to the vast (and sometimes ludicrous) threads made by Vanguarde. Recently I’ve been able to spot them simply by the title.
[Feel free to lock this if you feel it is inappropriate, I can’t see the harm]
> “Is the act creating multiple hot-topic threads, with very few statements of fact and a significant amount of prejudice, really beneficial to the Serious Discussion forum?”
Help would be appreciated in getting the threads.
# Some of Vanguarde’s threads
[I am ashamed that Obama is a cancer stick user.](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/36146)
[Vigilantes – good or bad?](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/35907)
[Should convicted felons get hospice care?](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/36075)
[It’s time for internet accountability.](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/36077)
[AX:Assume that god is real – what would he/she/it look like?](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/34578)
[We need to stop being so lazy.. ( Space topic )](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/35738)
[Orbiting Carbon Observatory sabotaged by republican agents?](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/35733)
[Stigma in the deaf community about cochlear implants. (?!)](http://www.kongregate.com/forums/9/topics/35325)
> *Originally posted by **[Darkruler2005](/forums/9/topics/36158?page=1#posts-748857):***
> I actually think this topic should be locked as well, but it apparently is all right to spout nonsense and throw out insults.
I made no insult.
You need to generalize this discussion, RMcD. Talking specifically about Vanguarde could easily be interpreted as harassment and/or slander, both of which are against the Kongregate code of conduct. This thread will most likely lead to a flame war between Vanguarde and his friends, and those who disagree with him.
I propose this for a more general discussion topic:
“Is the act of creating multiple hot-topic threads, with very few statements of fact and/or supporting evidence outside of personal experience and a significant amount of prejudice, really beneficial to the Serious Discussion forum?”
> “Is the act of creating multiple hot-topic threads, with very few statements of fact and/or supporting evidence outside of personal experience and a significant amount of prejudice, really beneficial to the Serious Discussion forum?”
Not at all. I propose a banning of all those who create such topics, for example, Vanguard.
Refer to post one for examples of Van’s threads.
That hardly solves the problem Kyru, even if I weren’t so blatant about it, people could easily infer who I’m talking about and flame wars would ensue anyway.
Ultimately, on this site, the rules matter most, not whats best for the community.
Well, I was hoping that RMcD would remove Vanguarde’s name from the title and his posts from the original post.
And not using names is the key to generalization. The moment you use names as an example it becomes personal.
> *Originally posted by **[pmr0078](/forums/9/topics/36158?page=1#posts-749194):***
> ah, tis been a while since me started me own thread, enjoying these funny ones to much me is
> ah but alast a serious thread I see coming into me mind, contemplating whether anyone will read it however