Debate

On Nov. 21st there will be a public debate on evolution and god, including the admin of Conservapedia.com if he agrees. The debate will be cancelled if he declines.

EDIT:There is the possibility of winning rights to edit the evolution/atheist pages.

A debate is worthless. Both sides are speaking different languages.

As it stands, there is no reasonable debate to evolution, but the “controversy” still remains.

Here?

Originally posted by Aaron_:

Here?

yes.

If you wish to be a judge, leave me a shout. Judges cannot post in the debates until the votes are cast.

How do we know who “wins”? Is it purely opinion, or is there some formal criteria?

Originally posted by Aaron_:

How do we know who “wins”? Is it purely opinion, or is there some formal criteria?

Judges decide based on vote. The debate ends when there is no post for two days.

Evolution and God alone? Wouldn’t that be a little bit odd considering there are people believing both can coexist?

Originally posted by Darkruler2005:

Evolution and God alone? Wouldn’t that be a little bit odd considering there are people believing both can coexist?

There will be two separate threads.

Originally posted by Darkruler2005:

Evolution and God alone? Wouldn’t that be a little bit odd considering there are people believing both can coexist?

Surely that can also be a point in the debate?

I would rather debate which tastes better, Oreo or Hydrox, than debate the people who run such a fail website.

Mmm, the white creamy center tastes SO GOOD…

We argue with you. And you hold the same views on such policies as gun control. You have attempted to tone it down from your days as Vanguarde2 for reasons I do not know.

Judges decide based on vote. The debate ends when there is no post for two days.

Sounds like a flame war waiting to happen.

Dibs on judge!

Originally posted by 1132:

We argue with you. And you hold the same views on such policies as gun control. You have attempted to tone it down from your days as Vanguarde2 for reasons I do not know.

I tone it down as a favor to the admins of Kong.

1132: Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

Ah.

Just a quick check…
Vannie probably did it cause he has gone through four Vanguarde-class profiles. Original, two, prime, and now vintage.

Originally posted by 1132:

Just a quick check…

Vannie probably did it cause he has gone through four Vanguarde-class profiles. Original, two, prime, and now vintage.

Surely vintage vanguarde would by definition be the same as original vanguarde? Poor choice of username there.

As for the actual topic, how would this debate be structured and who would participate?

Debate is cancelled, admin of conservapedia.com disagrees because he is not allowed to use the bible to disprove evolution.

Dang.

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Debate is cancelled, admin of conservapedia.com disagrees because he is not allowed to use the bible to disprove evolution.

Ah. A perfectly logical answer.

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Debate is cancelled, admin of conservapedia.com disagrees because he is not allowed to use the bible to disprove evolution.

Haha! Wow, no one saw that coming.

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Debate is cancelled, admin of conservapedia.com disagrees because he can’t disprove evolution.

Remember when we were going to have debates and then no one took charge and actually organized them?

Originally posted by TheBSG:

Remember when we were going to have debates and then no one took charge and actually organized them?

You mean the one on one debates from ages ago?