procrastination page 3

84 posts

Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

“I have never heard of books, so they must not be that important”

EDIT:

The link is completely relevant.

A sick-out is/is not a strike because . . .
Advertisements (music videos, etc.) are/are not works of art because . . .
History is/is not a science because . . .
Single parents (or gay couples, etc.) are/are not families because . . .
Lies include things that you don’t say because . . .
Frozen yogurt is/is not ice cream because . . .

these examples have nothing to do with anything discussed. if i look up advertisement in the dictionary, it says what it is. the unchangeable definition which can’t be misinterpreted because it’s set in stone.

 
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Agentius100:
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

“I have never heard of books, so they must not be that important”


EDIT:

The link is completely relevant.

A sick-out is/is not a strike because . . .

Advertisements (music videos, etc.) are/are not works of art because . . .

History is/is not a science because . . .

Single parents (or gay couples, etc.) are/are not families because . . .

Lies include things that you don’t say because . . .

Frozen yogurt is/is not ice cream because . . .

these examples have nothing to do with anything discussed. if i look up advertisement in the dictionary, it says what it is. the unchangeable definition which can’t be misinterpreted because it’s set in stone.

And there was more than one definition, right? And different dictionaries had different definitions, right? An the definition of words necer changes, right?

LOL

Read th forum rules, just posting lol is spam.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:
Originally posted by Agentius100:
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

“I have never heard of books, so they must not be that important”



EDIT:

The link is completely relevant.

A sick-out is/is not a strike because . . .


Advertisements (music videos, etc.) are/are not works of art because . . .


History is/is not a science because . . .


Single parents (or gay couples, etc.) are/are not families because . . .


Lies include things that you don’t say because . . .


Frozen yogurt is/is not ice cream because . . .

these examples have nothing to do with anything discussed. if i look up advertisement in the dictionary, it says what it is. the unchangeable definition which can’t be misinterpreted because it’s set in stone.

And there was more than one definition, right? And different dictionaries had different definitions, right? An the definition of words necer changes, right?

LOL

Read th forum rules, just posting lol is spam.

so what…uh red is white in one dictionary and blue is black?

 
Flag Post

so what…uh red is white in one dictionary and blue is black?

Define “fetus”.

 
Flag Post

No, Spam is canned ham in one dictionary and junkmail in another.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Jabor:

so what…uh red is white in one dictionary and blue is black?

Define “fetus”.

how bout you define it?

 
Flag Post

how bout you define it?

Whatever my definition, there are people who disagree with it.

Which was the whole point of using it as an example.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Jabor:

how bout you define it?

Whatever my definition, there are people who disagree with it.

Which was the whole point of using it as an example.

no there is only one definition, any other is slang

 
Flag Post

no there is only one definition,

Alright then. What is it? And who decides what it is?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Jabor:

no there is only one definition,

Alright then. What is it?

why should i state it? you know what it is

 
Flag Post

why should i state it? you know what it is

I might know what it is. How do I know that my definition is the same as yours?

Also:

And who decides what it is?

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Agentius100:
Originally posted by blood18:
words have concrete definitions. there is no interpretation

That is completely untrue. Have you never heard of an a definitional argument?

no i havent so it must not have much of a bearing on anything

and it really has nothing to do with the definition of words, what did you think, that i wouldnt bother to read you stupid F*%#) link you %$#%G #%*%

Wait wait so because I pointed out a huge flaw in your argument with something that you have never heard of it is some how invalid. Wow.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Jabor:

why should i state it? you know what it is

I might know what it is. How do I know that my definition is the same as yours?

Also:

And who decides what it is?


this is why you’re you and i’m glad i’m not

 
Flag Post

Stop trying to dodge the question.

 
Flag Post

Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.

not giving up

just tired of ignorance

 
Flag Post

There only ignorance here is on your half, where you actually made an argument from ignorance.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Jabor:

Stop trying to dodge the question.

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.

i guess this really isn’t ignorance

 
Flag Post

It isn’t. It is asking why you dodged a question, as you continually do. In fact, define ignorance.

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

It isn’t. It is asking why you dodged a question, as you continually do. In fact, define ignorance.

you and jabor are trying to bait into answering a loaded question by calling me ignorant.
you’r not worth anymore of the time it takes to type

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

It isn’t. It is asking why you dodged a question, as you continually do. In fact, define ignorance.

Ignorance is the inability to comprehend what other people are telling you, nor make any effort to understand.

“Pertokeyo is in a state of ‘ignorance’ because he/she has not bothered to look at any of the posts in this thread, nor is able to understand what the current argument is.”

However ignorance should not be used as a method of classing somebody as unintelligent, it is simply a state of being unaware.

 
Flag Post

You were not asked any loaded questions, and it was you that called us ignorant.

Explain to me how “define X” is a loaded question

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by JohnRulz:

You were not asked any loaded questions, and it was you that called us ignorant.

Explain to me how “define X” is a loaded question

your a real bright guy
i’d love to meet you in real life

 
Flag Post
Originally posted by Agentius100:
Originally posted by Jabor:

Stop trying to dodge the question.

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Are you going to actually address the comment or not? Because what you said makes me think you are giving up.

i guess this really isn’t ignorance

I think he was referring to this comment

Originally posted by Agentius100:
Originally posted by blood18:
words have concrete definitions. there is no interpretation

That is completely untrue. Have you never heard of an a definitional argument?

no i havent so it must not have much of a bearing on anything

and it really has nothing to do with the definition of words, what did you think, that i wouldnt bother to read you stupid F*%#) link you %$#%G #%*%