Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Sensou 1.5

« Back to Sensou 1.5

DubaiBunnies

Jun. 17, 2017

Under rating threshold (show) Magnificent game

+ - !

(0)

cuyraq1

Jul. 14, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) tbh this is just a online version of risk >.> its not really different

+ - !

(0)

Kosh67

Nov. 17, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) It may not take 50 tries to beat all the levels, b0b, but with the game/controller lag, it sure feels like it. Seriously, Akirasan, why? It's not as though it takes a Cray 50 just to register a freaking mouse click. How about some coding efficiency? As if being forced to hold down the mouse button for several seconds just to get it to register wasn't bad enough, why is the animation in this game measured in seconds/frame? I swear, the dice in this game take 2-3 seconds for each frame that it takes them to roll! The old version never suffered from this drastic lag, so why should this one? The countries are gradient filled? Great! Just draw up the map in a paint program and store the PNG files in your program! Done! As far as the animated ocean goes, I'm sure there has to be some efficient way for Flash to do an overlay over top of a scrolling tiled background. The rest of the game appears to be identical to the original. Fix those 2 things and the lag should be gone!

+ - !

(0)

LordLollipop

Aug. 08, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Worst version for Risk that I have ever played.

+ - !

(1)

von_Tyrone

Jul. 04, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) If this is intended to imitate Risk or Warlight, it only looks the part. The design and odds obviously favour the AI, the interface is clunky and the decision to force any movement to end all attack options makes no sense. Very disappointing.

+ - !

(-1)

hdyft

Feb. 14, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) This is possibly the worst game i have ever played. I'll attack a square with one army, with a total of ten armies, then i'll lose them all. Then the computer will put ten in that square and destroy me, EVERY TIME. FIX THIS NOW!!!

+ - !

(1)

Hyrael

Jan. 18, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) So multiplayer don't work anymore?

+ - !

(0)

WAFFELSnBACON

Nov. 11, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) It seems like that the more lands you control the stronger your troops are, so 1 troops takes out 10

+ - !

(0)

Hauntedminer146

Oct. 22, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) did i just lose 30 units vs 3?

+ - !

(2)

stefano19827

Oct. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) this really sucks . whats the point in placing your troops after your players plays his turns ?? of course is an advantage for him since he attacks a player who has depleted his troops in his precedent attacking turn ... this is so retarded

+ - !

(7)

stefano19827

Oct. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) giving a star cause hate pointless risiko . also the music is stolen from a strategic game from sierra or something like that , caesar or stuff like that

+ - !

(0)

ElisangelaA

Jul. 12, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) oi

+ - !

(1)

AtlasRedux

Jan. 24, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I'm not sure, but it seem it's fixed. The odds after 100 rounds is 37% in my favor. That is pretty much impossible if it's really random

+ - !

(-1)

jmccman

Nov. 03, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-6)

nillon4

Sep. 03, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

Braundy94

Sep. 02, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) It's easy, all you have to do is find a corner where there are only a few ways of them reaching you and defend until you have enough forces to wipe out everything.

+ - !

(0)

SAM0095

Aug. 03, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Incorporate troop numbers into the battles please, at least then we can trust that large numbers will beat the smaller ones

+ - !

(-2)

SAM0095

Aug. 03, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Really, I don't think it actually is random. He has made a mistake or has made it purposefully more difficult, on the first level, I had 12 troops on my front line and 10 countries, he had 4. he reinforced his country to 7 then trounced 24 troops and followed through everywhere else so I had 3 countries even though only one troop is meant to be sent through, I then used my remaining 12 to get countries back, on first attempt I lost 8, I try somewhere else and lose 3. Then he beats me next turn. Fix the random engine it can't be correct

+ - !

(-1)

DoorbellX

Aug. 01, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Rate 1/5 so this game can be rated pi. That would be epic.

+ - !

(-2)

AlexismasterHG

May. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-3)

PattyM03

Mar. 16, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

Captain_Sparky

Jan. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

Anonymouse123e

Jan. 01, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) The compy has the advantage? Guys, it's a 3 die limit. Haven't you noticed how when you lose with 13 guys only 3 die are thrown? It's not 13 die or something, if 13 die were thrown it would be an instant win, seeing as the minimum number would be 13. In less words, 3 units works as well as 48, but if you have 48 you can restock units. So to guys like big bo, take that into mind.

+ - !

(3)

avwold

Dec. 01, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) i wish you could pick your starting squares

+ - !

(15)

Superfrog10

Aug. 09, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) ok yea the games reallyyy hard to win, but it is possible i assure you... just might take a while to learn a strategy, and a good starting spot. Usually the trick is to get a solid part of the map and let the enemies kill eachother, and slowly dominate the map.

+ - !

(7)

Megaeak

Aug. 01, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) OK so computer starts with 13 armies and I start with 5?!?! How am I supposed to EVER win at this??

+ - !

(20)

b0b_6uy00

Jul. 24, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) v.s computer: odds may seem stacked at times, but will even out if you play smart.. which isn't so difficult. I used to like this game, but that is when it was NEW, and people played the multiplayer.

+ - !

(4)

b0b_6uy00

Jul. 24, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) You are a rising general with aspirations to take over the world. With horrible troops, limited tactical ability odd recruitment methods, and no ICBM's to speak of, see to it that your life's goal is realized! don't cry when it takes 50 tries to beat all the levels.

+ - !

(20)

Thorerikglad

Jul. 13, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) falld asllep at the computer for a hour and still not done

+ - !

(0)

dietokillfun2

Jul. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) 3/5. Its a decent risk game, but the computer seems to have an advantage over you half the time and i don't like how the game bases who loses off of highest dice and not total amount show on the dice.

+ - !

(2)

underlordgc

Jul. 02, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

sirasa4

Jul. 01, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) nobody here :(

+ - !

(-2)

me929

Jun. 10, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

me929

Jun. 10, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) 3/5 stars but has potential to be 5/5 keep working on it :) would love to see a 2.0 with less computer advantage and maybe something like you can buy horses and annon but they have an advantage like horses can move 2 contrys instead of one and cannon can attack 3 contrys away and cannot die because of it but they cannot defend (good for when you have one country compleatly safe that cant do anything also would like to see ability to play on whole globe at once

+ - !

(0)

firedemon7

May. 27, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Why does the enemy get two dice whilst you get only 1...They have a maximum of 12 defence yet you can only have a max 5 attack...You only win if they get something like a two and another 2 and you get a 6...THEY HAVE DOUBLE THE CHANCES OF VICTORY!...0/5

+ - !

(-2)

ATD44

Mar. 14, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

JediRHot

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

grifkiller

Mar. 06, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) ...... this game sucks. half the time it never shows the roll, and it will let the computers choose whether they attack right after reenforcing. this is a 0/5.

+ - !

(-2)

JamesRandall

Feb. 17, 2010

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

WAFFELSnBACON

Feb. 14, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) kayukin think of WW2 japan almost conquered all of china look at those countries or the vietnam war the vietnamese won agianst us

+ - !

(-2)

swordmasta5

Jan. 23, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) there is some kind of glitch my territories always lose two troops every time i invaded!

+ - !

(-1)

yupodium

Jan. 05, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) it's just not exactly a clever idea...some people at least give the places new names, and some go as far as to make certain areas have a better chance of winning against certain other areas...but this is just a sad remake. If I had invented Risk, I'd be infuriated.

+ - !

(0)

lasty58

Dec. 17, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) i had a 13 vs a 1 and lost

+ - !

(-1)

Kayukin

Dec. 13, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) Confused.. I attacked a area with 1 using 6 and I still lost.. This is possible how?

+ - !

(0)

zeektheawesome

Dec. 12, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) actually brian it uses strategy with numbers of troops making u better and more likely to win

+ - !

(0)

iown212

Dec. 08, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) Copy-Right Infringement.... gosh darn a-holes

+ - !

(-1)

xxxxxx2

Dec. 04, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) these dice a rigged!

+ - !

(0)

bankaixr

Oct. 25, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) FIRST COMMENT IN A LONG TIME.

+ - !

(-1)

djemdge

Oct. 01, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) waw

+ - !

(0)

Brianf66total

Sep. 20, 2009

Under rating threshold (show) It is not a strategy, I won Like twice, Lost a few too, but just seriously stop making this ganre, make a cooler game I know you can do it.

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate