Comments for Assembler 2

« Back to Assembler 2

ccic

Dec. 10, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I just find level 22 too much hard. frustrated. maybe the last four level in the last row all too difficult

+ - !

(-1)

ccic

Dec. 10, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) anyone finished upto 25 ? not see one on youtube

+ - !

(-1)

xEiBx

Dec. 1, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Great game :) i like the consept, and the difficulty is well set as well

+ - !

(-1)

TheWinterCold

Nov. 27, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) PITA? like Pita bread? are you bagging pita bread?

+ - !

(-1)

cereto

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Good game... I'm not good enough for level 11

+ - !

(-1)

HeAdShOtGuNnEr

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I Like It :D, 6.5/10.

+ - !

(-1)

turkishninja

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) good game but too hard for me 4/5

+ - !

(-1)

makuta2

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) good game, much more dificult than the previous one, so retarded people who rated down will not be able to grasp its concept, 4/5

+ - !

(-2)

FoamHead

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Give me the ability to prevent a piece from spinning and the ability to spin a piece and then the mediocre gameplay wouldn't be as big of a PITA.

+ - !

(-1)

a_tagg

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Annoying physics - but not too hard - good concept.

+ - !

(-1)

vorpalauroch

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) wonky physics only works for squares, in a physics game. Fail.

+ - !

(-1)

hugelkills

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) this game is horrible. it is not fun and hard so dont bother, this game is a waste of time 1/5

+ - !

(0)

mindtooth

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) finito not so hard

+ - !

(-1)

casimodo

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Not reallybright on the physics, but still a good concept.

+ - !

(-1)

finnishgamer

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) poo physics i hate it everything is lake its 2X the speed FFS!

+ - !

(-1)

Alblaka

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Got crushed on L16... *Mindblast* But cool game, 4/5 Much fun is to drag a box ramdomly around on the screen XD

+ - !

(-1)

zoidfrybennib

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) View solution should show the "best" solution, not what we just did. Why would we need to see that? Seeing different ones would help give ideas for solving future levels.

+ - !

(-1)

Mossoi

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Really really frustrating game. The objects affect each other too easily and don't seem to rotate around where they are being held correctly.

+ - !

(-1)

HTOdinTH

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

MordredofFairy

Nov. 26, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) as was said before, it's very bad design in that the difficulty is not from figuring out what to do, but in doing it. Thats mouse avoider type of games, not puzzle games. I tried it for a while, but the physics part is just awful for that. Not really the engine itself, but the way you have to keep trying with those wiggly bits, possibly having to start over because you clicked slightly wrong, sending a part into rotation and kicking everything away again. This game is more frustrating than fun, it's like playing chess, knowing exactly what move you want to make, but you have to get your cat to move the piece for you. Just not fun.

+ - !

(-1)

phooltk

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) the difficulty comes from struggling with the bad controls, not solving the 'puzzles'. That's a bad thing.

+ - !

(-1)

bubblecars

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) need help on 6

+ - !

(-1)

omeganaut

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) needs better engine, easier goals, just too hard to play for fun.

+ - !

(-1)

Jeffkins

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I played some jelly game was exactly the same as this, but they both had exactly the same problem: crap physics for a physics game.

+ - !

(0)

sev496

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) physics need to be improved

+ - !

(0)

golduck350

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Wow, what an annoying game

+ - !

(0)

rekos

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) cant get past lvl 3 because when i even the weght it still turns constantly 1/5

+ - !

(0)

Djkgb

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) 4/5 pretty good but hard.

+ - !

(0)

Oranjeschaap

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Sorry but this game is just too frustrating. Everything just keeps falling and it's impossible to get anything straight. Maybe it's just that I suck at this game, but it's definitely not very fun for me.

+ - !

(0)

Amiziras

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) is a nice game but the physics...

+ - !

(0)

jacksonas

Nov. 25, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) awesome!

+ - !

(0)

Trid

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) level 9 is evil.

+ - !

(1)

ribex

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) The physics are too screwed up. Sorry, this is more frustration than fun. It seems like gravity is set too low or something. :(

+ - !

(0)

sgtdroopy

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I enjoyed assembler, but this sequel is no good. It is just more tedious than puzzley.

+ - !

(0)

BryceSummer

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Thanks for the comments everyone. Yeah, I'll have to admit the difficulty curve is a little steep compared to Assembler 1... I'll probably end up adding in some more levels between the harder ones.

+ - !

(0)

Misaki

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) kinda ticks me off until i win...then i get realllll happy. too bad there is no achievements i would own at that =D\ i give it a 4.5/5 cuz like i said its kinda too hard but very addicting

+ - !

(0)

Guit_Pops

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Weird physics, but fun nonetheless.

+ - !

(0)

BryceSummer

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Digyourowngrave must have gotten it from the mochiads distrubution network... Which Assembler 2 has not been approved for yet (it takes about 24 hours after you release the game)

+ - !

(0)

suvius4

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) lvl 6 HARD

+ - !

(0)

cloud212823

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) sorry lol but btw why didn't u post it on DYOG first? you posted your first game there if it is :/

+ - !

(0)

suvius4

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) nice game like that jelly one but this does not lag

+ - !

(0)

BryceSummer

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Man I wish there was an edit button or something, just saw your next comment, heh.

+ - !

(0)

BryceSummer

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Cloud, check my profile... I am in fact the creator of both Assembler 1 & 2. You'll also notice that Assembler 2 has 25 levels, among other changes from Assembler 1.

+ - !

(0)

cloud212823

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i think kong should have a delete comment button -.-

+ - !

(0)

cloud212823

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) ignore my comment though it seems as though IT COULD POSSSIBLY

+ - !

(0)

cloud212823

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) stolen there is no assembler 2 this guy just stole assembler and changed its name to cover it up http://www.digyourowngrave.com/assembler/

+ - !

(0)

jono1221

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) oops. nevermind

+ - !

(0)

jono1221

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) first comment! real fun game.

+ - !

(-1)

lindar

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) uray!!!!!!!!!!!! my first first comment :))))))))))))) so 5/5 :)

+ - !

(0)

lindar

Nov. 24, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) 1

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment