Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The win/loss ratio for the attacker on an even number of die for attacker and defender should be 15/21. I've noticed the casualties are closer to 1 to 3! I've also noticed a -3 tends to happen about as much as a -2/-1. A -3 for the attacker should happen about 1/5, -3 for the defender should happen about 7.2/100 or less that 1/10. I'm not sure how their figuring wins and losses but it's not true odds. But the computer is a bad enough strategist you should still be able to win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Uh... have any of you ever played RISK? Yes, defense wins on a tie, but attack gets up to three dice. Minimum amount of troops that you get at the beginning of your turn is three. The game does need a manual to explain its rules, but it's fairly balanced.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
hmmmm. three of my enemies only hav 1 territory and their still gettin three troops each........... interesting.........
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How did the computer win? I had 8 on one and the computer had 1...
It said -4 on ONE turn...take this game off please, and make some revisions or something, this sucks.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I appreciate the effort but the dice are totally loaded on the side of the defense. That makes it a lot less fun. Keep going though the next one will be better!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Risk rip off but better than a lot of other risk rip offs. I liked it but the computer wasn't always winning when i played.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
most levels take forever because the dice rolling sucks. and its always in the computers favor. usually end up like me: -26, computer -2
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
yeah this is really terrible. i had 16 and the enemy had 2. i lost! its retarded dude. 1/5 for you pathetic piece of crap game. thanks for wasting my time
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i got more than computer and it takes one away from me ! WTF ! WTF ! 0/5 if i could if it that , i can tell a 1 eyed cyclops made this ( look above at designers pic )