Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Sensou

« Back to Sensou

OuTrIgHtChAoS

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) i like how completely random the army placement is at the beginning. sometimes its rather equal. sometimes they have twice as many... i just did one where my average per country was 4 and theres was 7. and one game i started with 37 armies in one country. way way way too much luck

+ - !

(0)

kevinzhou3

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) The RNG is crazy! I can beat the AI 3 on 6, but I can't beat it 3 on 3?

+ - !

(0)

ChickenButt

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) MAJOOOOORRRR bug on asia. I finished PLACING armies and 18 of them disappeared when i hit ok. wtf

+ - !

(0)

Gwenix

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) The statistics for the offense/defense rolls were not well thought out. In Risk, which this game is obviously based on, the defender gets to defend with a max of 2 dice, but wins ties. This offsets the advantage of winning ties. In this game, both attackers and defenders roll the same amount of dice (if more than 3 troops), but defender wins ties. Even if the AI is not cheating, this gives the defender a tremendous boon. There needs to be more advantage to attackers.

+ - !

(0)

ChickenButt

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) found a bug... i had 11 armies on Japan when i finished a turn, by the time it got back to my turn, only 2 were left, and noone attacked it

+ - !

(0)

iranaeus

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Moving at end of turn sucks. Should be able to move in as many as you want at the end of an attack. Also, in RISK defender only has two dice.

+ - !

(0)

Elith

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Crappy, no fun, boring version of risk.

+ - !

(0)

GoSoft

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Number Gen=Your Ugly Shitty Mom Fix it up or die!

+ - !

(-1)

crazycruiser

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I didn't like it, I'm sorry. Too AI favored.

+ - !

(0)

chucknorris101

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) HORRIBLE fix the number gen

+ - !

(0)

Kmcneal

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Craptastic!!!!!!, couldn't even take over Austrailia the game cheats so much!!!! Make it better or remove it!!!

+ - !

(0)

oligo

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) As so many others have said, the random number generator is fucked up. The computer consistently wins every battle. I've started the game 5 times now and after every first round by the AI I have less than 10 troops left. Something's not right.

+ - !

(0)

Supahlol

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) hmm i had 123 and lost from a sixty? WTF?!

+ - !

(0)

chunkytuna

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I really wanted to like this game, but unfortunately it sucks. It could be an awesome game, but it's horribly unplayable right now.

+ - !

(0)

Krine

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I just attacked one country with a score of four with five countries with a score of four. Every single attack resulted in a big ol' -3 for my countries. Every. Single. One. 1'd forever.

+ - !

(0)

Duveroux

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) lol hard? pfft, just put several thousand troops into one territory. way too easily bugged

+ - !

(0)

LostCause

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Yeh, worst game ive ever played you should kill your self for uploading it, letter known making it....

+ - !

(-1)

lexnaturalis

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) The random number generator is terrible. The AI consistently gets higher rolls.

+ - !

(0)

Florenty

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I understand your points of viex about the randomize because i also thinks it fucks but if it was really randomized it would be too much easy.

+ - !

(-1)

POPDOG3

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) wow i had a 30 and i attacked a 2 and it killed my 30... this is a terrble game

+ - !

(0)

Jayhawk

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Hmm - if these rolls were realistic the computer shouldn't be winning 2/3rds of the engagements. Definitely unfair. I can see where this would be fun as a multiplayer. But right now it all comes down to luck, how you start.

+ - !

(0)

Sesspool

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) the balance is bad and the random algorithm needs some serious help.

+ - !

(0)

TheWizardUltra

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) This Game is Broken. It Does'nt Play well at All. If You are Going to Clone RISK, At Least Do It Right!

+ - !

(0)

Arrow42

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I was in south america with like 13 territorys... and suddenly one of my enemeys starts to just kill everything. It won every roll and beat me down to like 5... in one round without losing anything! wtf. damn rng!

+ - !

(0)

Thitor

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) i's sad because the graphics are nice, change the balance and re-prog the IA (I can gice you some advise if you want to)

+ - !

(0)

Thitor

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) soo slow!!!!!!!!!!! ASIA round is so so so so sos so so borrrrrrrrrrrrrninggggggggggggggggggg!

+ - !

(0)

Thitor

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) So poor IA..... and the balance suck so much : really too much defence... so it's so so boooring!!!! (1/5)

+ - !

(0)

Tuckiee

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I am not sure if it's my bad luck or poor random dice design. But the randomization seems to heavily favor the NPC in single player mode. I've played 10 games in a row and I cannot win a single colony and the computer always beats me. Still a good game, 4/5

+ - !

(0)

Dilts36

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) 50/10... and i lose with 50... how does that work. i think this game gets nothing better then a 1

+ - !

(0)

Dilts36

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) wow. isnt this called risk? good try thou, i guess.

+ - !

(0)

yogsloth

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Clicked "start" and the computer promptly played the entire game, effectively wiping me out without me needing to click again. Pointless.

+ - !

(0)

CaptainJester

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Attempt to improve on risk failed. It is too risky to attack since the defender gets 3 dice along with the attacker. I lost a battle when I had 20 and the defender had 3. Luck should not play that much if the game says strategy, strategy and more strategy.

+ - !

(0)

AlphaEvermore

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Nice game. It is different enough from Risk (no Blitzkreig; play one continent at a time) to be quite interesting. A few typos but no bugs. The AI is flawed but better than most for games of this type.

+ - !

(0)

Abelard

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Total "Risk"; limiting it to one section of the world at a time speeds play, but means you have a harder time offsetting losses with gains elsewhere. Meh. 3/5, but only because I like "Risk".

+ - !

(0)

AsureaSkie

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) This game is horrible. The first game I've voted 1-star on, and the only game I've ever wished I could vote 0 on. The AI is crap. I kept a guy with 120 armies surrounded with 1-army countries, with one big 80-army sitting next door. Instead of quickly sweeping up the 1-armies to boost his production, he occasionally wasted a few on my big guy. The computer never attacks enough to be effective, either. To cap it off, the defender's advantage in this game is DISGUSTING. If you're going to make a Risk clone, realize that there is a reason why the defender only gets two dice. It's called "balance", and this game has none.

+ - !

(0)

blah3

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) 1/5 for not bothering to include instructions

+ - !

(0)

Horosco

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Very well done. To those having trouble: Only three units can attack or defend in a single attack. Dice are not added together to resolve the conflict, they are compared one dice to one dice.

+ - !

(0)

Prinny

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Of course this game is not strategy Talinn , its luck :p .. and maybe you shouldnt attack ppl , you can just turtle and keep the 4:1 till you get 100+ troops ya know ..

+ - !

(0)

ChickenButt

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) and luca......duh

+ - !

(0)

ChickenButt

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) listen to alexanderpink

+ - !

(0)

luca7777

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) this is a simplified-electronic-copy of the classical game "Risiko", very popular in Italy and I think in the world, maybe best known as "Risk" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_(game)

+ - !

(0)

wackojacko

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) got the geography wrong

+ - !

(0)

alexanderpink

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Oh, and the opponents never attack, especially not each other. This game is about a 2.5/5.

+ - !

(0)

alexanderpink

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) This game is ridiculous. I have wasted time getting to level 6 only to be unable to get an advantage. You armies are constantly killed even when you outnumber the opponent 4:1. This game needs to seriously be readjusted. In risk you have an advantage when attacking b/c the defender can only use 2 dice to defend, and you can attack with 3. This balances out the fact that ties go to the defender. Fix that and the game would be much better.

+ - !

(0)

andoroido

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Computer gets extra armies AND cheats dice rolls, chance of winning, maybe 5%. Good interface, boring single player.

+ - !

(0)

Patzta

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) 'Play over 6 levels of pure strategy' EVERYTHING in this game is determined by dice rolls. THERE IS NO STRATEGY INVOLVED IN DICE ROLLS.

+ - !

(0)

flashhero2007

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) this is like risk! the game i have looks just like it! sweet... but you don't roll the dice...

+ - !

(0)

Talinn

Dec. 10, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Explain to me how an army of sixteen is wiped out by one of two in one single attack. This game is not strategy. it is luck.

+ - !

(0)

CodeGuy

Dec. 09, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) The fact that superiority in numbers doesn't matter is silly. If I have 21 guys and he has 3, I shouldn't lose 10 guys over three turns.

+ - !

(0)

BrknPhoenix

Dec. 09, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I thought it looked promising until on Level 1 no matter how great of an advantage I had in numbers, I got raped constantly over and over again. To the point were I am suspicious that this isn't even random, but biased against the player :(

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate