Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not too bad of a game o.o'' Just has a decent pool of seasoned players I suppose... so arena can be annoying/difficult at times.:/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One of best CCG games i've played. It's balanced and keeps you interested in both single player and multiplayer, while give you enough things to do on the side. Create cards from materials you win while playing, buying packs from winnings in champaing and in chalenges and tournies..
You also have lots of free things to do, while you can also pay small amount of $ to give you boost in the start.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If banished knight is giving you trouble with his mass armor and jester, lightning elemental and volatile are your friends. I won with nothing but commons and uncommons
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Like the game but harder levels should equal to more gold in the game. It would help if there were achievements in the game. This tends to get more people to play the game. 4.5/5 Good game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game really surprises me for the graphics and the mechanics. But I reaaly feel that the design of the cards and the signature of each realm is not realy unique. I hope the developers try to look into that to create a diverse game xperience from each realm.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Game's been down all day...it's certainly taking you a while to get it back up...hope you will give customers some compensation!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You know what's something cool this game needs? A TRADING SYSTEM! I don't know if anybody else suggested this, but this seems like a great idea! Maybe...trade cards you don't want for...gold, or other cards? EVEN GEMS?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've come across a bug, if you give a creature with "Weak 1" "Strong 1" until end of turn, the weak effect never comes back.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is down for everyone. I've tried it on four different browsers, both wifi and hard wired services with no success. I'll reach out to Kongregate and see if they have any info.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When it comes to online games like this, I generally put things into two categories; games that I push to the back of my mind ASAP and try my best to pretend don't exist, and those that I favorite and sink a fair bit of time into. This could've had the potential to be the latter, but unfortunately it failed one of the primary checks to allow it to do so; an energy system instantly takes a game out of potential consideration. I mean, I have no idea who the first person to come up with energy was, but whatever retarded piece of certain developers' brains that make them believe that it's a good idea needs to be removed. It is not a good idea. It does not make people want to pay to play your game. It pisses them off and makes them want to leave, as it's not like you're getting anything new by paying to refill your energy. All you're doing is paying to play, and if I'm going to pay solely to play a game I could find way the hell better ones to do so with.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Every mod I've seen in this game has been fair. (HotdogDurden is probably the most strict though.) Don't try to get banned and you probably won't.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
could you add a way to challenge specific people
e.g. a list or search box so that people can challenge there friends
rate this comment so the developers can see it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I almost left the page when I saw the energy feature, but at least you allow us to play through the story without using it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The recents changes to the Mekana Banner of MEK doesnt hinder the typical "little constructs swarm deck". But the nerfs to Bothar affects them a great deal to his usual style of play. In contrast I dont see Felincia being changed every month, maybe because its a hero with normal flaws and advantages, maybe it would have been better that the same released time Bother and Mek would have been better planned before their release to be more equilibrated, not the brutal OP they are at the moment?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I would like it if, instead of having a 5% chance every pack of core gold, so that it's possible to get multiple epics in a row, that it would be more like every 20th pack has an epic, with the other 19 having rares.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Qewl Or maybe use one of you're spare decks instead? Or buy another deck slot? Why do you think we have extra deck slots anyway?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There should be some sort of randomised uber-campaign or some other mean to win small cards. Really looking forward for the expansion, there is quite a few gaps that need filling - once these are filled (and filled good), this could be a very fine game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dylan118247: That's bullshit, you can get a maxed tier 3 hero from the beginning with a pack as add on with gems, you can buy packs you just can't otherwise, you can buy 10xPacks that gives you an Epic all the time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is amazing, and if you like Magic the Gathering, you'll love it.
It's free to play on Kongregate, Steam, NewGrounds, or through their own website. NOTICE: The website/platform you play on will be your ONLY account, so choose wisely, as you'll be stuck with that one.
(i.e. You can't switch from steam to newgrounds because you can't link account like that).