Comments for CalcuDoku Light Vol 1

« Back to CalcuDoku Light Vol 1

Andostre

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) An option to not not show possible solutions in the window at the bottom would be a plus. The game is too easy, and therefore not really interesting, as it is. Also, here's another request for a "next puzzle" feature. With such a slick UI, the lack of this feature really stands out.

+ - !

(8)

Santrial

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Consistently ignoring the most simple of requests, a Next Puzzle button, really sheds a bad light on you as a developer. and because it's been ignored for so long, I can't give this a rating higher than a single star. I'm only here for the badge, then I'm gone. 1/5

+ - !

(11)

kmartinator

Jul. 3, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) A small request: when you put little numbers in the bottom corner of the square, if you put more than one number, it automatically rearranges them in ascending order. Could there be an option to turn this feature off? I like to put the numbers in different orders to correspond with values in other boxes (ex. in a multiplying section for 2, I know that the box will be either a 1 or a 2, so in the first box I mark (1,2) in the little corner, and in the other box I mark (2,1), giving me a visual indicator that if one box is 2, the other must be 1). It's not hugely necessary for that specific example, but the values can web out from that, and it gets confusing to keep it all straight. Thanks!

+ - !

(5)

CoCoN_16

Sep. 18, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I totally agree with CrystalShadow. Using this hintbox you can solve every puzzle as mindlessly as easy sudoku without even thinking what's going on and what operations you're doing.

+ - !

(3)

urmelhelble

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Let's be honest: Level 1 + 2 would have made a pretty tough easy badge.

+ - !

(3)

catpaw

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) It so easy, its almost an insult to intelect.

+ - !

(7)

FFavatar

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) boring....stop making light packs instead of making hard pack....and also make better directions for people just starting the game I had to figure out myself what the numbers in the boxes at the start meant. also add a next puzzle button

+ - !

(7)

tyman121

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I really enjoy almost all of the puzzle games you've made, but like specialistol said; a 'next puzzle' button would be great. I've seen one requested on almost all of your games, and it's always ignored.

+ - !

(7)

Siddy00

May. 25, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Awesome game ^^ Some background music would be a nice addition, by the way. Just a hint for the next game - which I'm definitely looking forward to! ;)

+ - !

(2)

langlect

May. 24, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I love the game, but the symbols are too small and I can't see them. There should be a way to zoom the image bigger

+ - !

(2)

chaos123456

Mar. 5, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) ok, so there is no point to a next button? what about music? something soothing would be the finishing touch to a game like this, with a mute button. No sound is just a bit ridiculous for a game on a computer. However, nice concept- and make a calculus version for lols. 4/5

+ - !

(2)

e0x19

Mar. 3, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) This is just ken ken.

+ - !

(2)

Quayle

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Good concept, but it's not much of a challenge sadly. This, just as the other games are missing a button for "next puzzle". My guess is that the gui simply is copy and paste, with only changing the puzzles. If you know your way around Sudoku, the math simply doesn't matter.

+ - !

(2)

Peragin

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I would appreciate it more if there were more hard puzzles and less easy puzzles.

+ - !

(2)

raymat

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @ffavatar there is a rules page you can read if you dont know how to play

+ - !

(2)

alitha98

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Next button please!!!

+ - !

(4)

RapidPanda

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) And then I noticed the "Show Solution" button and I knew my misnamed badge was all but earned.

+ - !

(6)

stark52

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Tedious.

+ - !

(6)

Octavi

Oct. 6, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) Super hard on my screen to tell the difference between addition and division when the symbols are so small. Having to infer which is which was an extra little challenge on some of those later puzzles.

+ - !

(3)

Razael

Jul. 10, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Why does it tell you how to calculate stuff? Isn't that the point?

+ - !

(3)

JHunz

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) 5 stars...minus 3 for trolling

+ - !

(3)

cold_fusion

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) should be called Count-Doku

+ - !

(4)

Daikaju

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Description has a typo. "In CalcuDoku a number may be used more than once in the same block." Unless I'm reading it wrong, it should be may NOT. Also, it would be amazing to have a feature to turn off the solution hints in the bottom off where we would need to use math. It's nice to have the possible equations right there, but not having them would make math nerds happy and provide a bigger challenge.

+ - !

(4)

maddenbowl2009

Jan. 20, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) if you hate the cheat-box then hold control and hit - twice. in other words, zoom out two times.

+ - !

(1)

Tsalnor

Feb. 25, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @Erile You should know that you just need to hover over the box to be able to type it in.

+ - !

(7)

deathcomb

Mar. 4, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Kenken anybody?

+ - !

(3)

Khepera

Mar. 6, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I was a little disappointed, I expected a calcudoku to be more challenging than a good Sudoku, it's not.

+ - !

(3)

Sloublues

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) The ability to list possibilities in each square is greatly appreciated.

+ - !

(3)

NeilSenna

Mar. 3, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) The most difficult part of these games is wading through the terrible guides and working out how to play them. And still no 'next' button.

+ - !

(4)

TrulySilentLie

Mar. 3, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) A pretty decent game, but since the creator has completely disregarded the many suggestions for a "next puzzle" feature, I will vote a 2 for it. This has been a big problem in all the earlier games, and since it has still not been dealt with, I can't rate this game any higher

+ - !

(4)

DarkestChaos248

Apr. 21, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) sorry for cheating everyone

+ - !

(1)

omgitsalex369

Mar. 10, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I finished all the puzzles in levels one and two, but still no badge. Anyone else having the same problem?

+ - !

(1)

Reddog

Mar. 7, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Absolutely love it, do you think you could add like a "No Checking Mode" to the next one? Would love the added challenge!

+ - !

(1)

ChibiPirate55

Mar. 7, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Fun, as usual, but with some interface issues. Others have already mentioned the lack of a simple "next" button, but I'm also running into an issue with the popup number selector. If you move too quickly between consecutive boxes, the selector often pops up for the previous box, then disappears, since you're nowhere near it. For those who want a mouse-only game, this does get pretty annoying.

+ - !

(1)

demonearl88

Mar. 6, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @Moomatron Oh my glob! I thought I was the only one to get the Adventure Time reference. xD

+ - !

(1)

samuel745

Sep. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @David The game doesn't check to see if you have a definite answer. It checks to see if all lines have 1 of each number etc. And if you do then you win.

+ - !

(1)

Elsarion

Jul. 14, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Your routine for checking if the inserted numbers are correct is just comparing to the solution instead of checking the integrity of the inserted numbers. This makes it possible to solve any puzzle simply with try and error. Beside this point its a nice game, although the puzzles could be a bit harder.

+ - !

(2)

cgfreak

Mar. 12, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Another conceptis game, another bunch of people getting really upset about having to click twice to get to the next puzzle instead of once.

+ - !

(2)

discsid

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Entertaining at first, but ultimately the math mattered not at all.... all about logical placement of numbers.

+ - !

(2)

akoaysigod

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) It's Ken Ken except easier and boring.

+ - !

(2)

akeresh

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) For those who asked for harder puzzles, there's lots of them on griddlers.net. Unlike the dev of this game its a completely free site. You can find there this type if puzzles (under Number Logic Puzzles) as well as others types you might have seen before. You can also find there very attentive staff and live community. Give it a try, you won't regret.

+ - !

(3)

gamerscul9870

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) error check makes the game a bit too easy, but the puzzle is quite easy to solve i can get some puzzles at least 40 seconds as a record!

+ - !

(2)

Blackdrazon

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @Daikaju: I think the rule about more than one number applies to bent blocks in much harder puzzles that don't appear in this collection, but I might be wrong.

+ - !

(2)

nadiakasper24

Mar. 3, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) lol...i found a second solution to lvl 2 puzzle 2...had to fix it to win, but still amusing

+ - !

(2)

Konstiin

Mar. 10, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) not only is this a ripoff of kenkens, and making a different name for them 'calcudokus' as if you actually came up with this idea; but it's not fun to play... All of the calculations possible come up in the bottom rectangle, meaning that there's really no calculation needed to play the actual game. @omgitsalex369, use the report missing badge function, or try reloading the game. 2/5 for ripping off a great puzzle, and also for having many of the same problems as your previous games did.

+ - !

(2)

Zeodeathgod

Feb. 29, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) you guys are the best. I enjoy every single one of your games, just wish you would improve small things on them, than theyd be perfect.

+ - !

(2)

abraxaas

Feb. 26, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) It would be great if Conceptis could add some harder puzzles to this set.

+ - !

(2)

badgecrasher

Mar. 4, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) People, please stop acting like spoiled opera divas. Alright, a next button would be convenient, but a lack of it does not signify "not caring about people who love and play his games". For god's sake, you have to click either one or two times more, an operation that I can perform in 0.2 seconds, and coupled with moving to mouse should still not take more than a second. Less than a second. That's what you lose, and I do not consider it enough to take a well-deserved point off this excellent puzzle collection. Five marks.

+ - !

(0)

JosephL

Mar. 1, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Nice to see Kenken on Kong, but there's a bit of an issue re: time. I was doing the last puzzle in the second level, and my finger slipped, hitting the 4 first (correct), then 5 (incorrect). It gave me credit for finishing the puzzle in 0:50, but then showed the puzzle with the 5 in place. After I changed it to a 4, it gave me credit for finishing the puzzle again, but in 1:43. I think it added on the initial time of 0:50 to the "second" time of what was probably 0:53, since it took me about 3 seconds to put the puzzle right again. Don't know if this is going to be a thing, but I thought you should know.

+ - !

(1)

Schivnorr

Mar. 2, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) + if you want to be able to hide that box below the puzzle showing the possible combinations for each area.

+ - !

(1)

  • add a comment