Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Absolutely love it, do you think you could add like a "No Checking Mode" to the next one? Would love the added challenge!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fun, as usual, but with some interface issues. Others have already mentioned the lack of a simple "next" button, but I'm also running into an issue with the popup number selector. If you move too quickly between consecutive boxes, the selector often pops up for the previous box, then disappears, since you're nowhere near it. For those who want a mouse-only game, this does get pretty annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Xotano You never have to guess at these types of puzzles. In the game you mention, you can use the '4 total' rectangle in the bottom right to deduce that the '3 total' rectangle above it must read '2 1'
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pretty good game but too many of the level 2 puzzles rely on lucky guesses. like the second one you get a 1 and there is nothing containing a one in either of the possible directions making that 1 a non clue number.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok, so there is no point to a next button? what about music? something soothing would be the finishing touch to a game like this, with a mute button. No sound is just a bit ridiculous for a game on a computer. However, nice concept- and make a calculus version for lols. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I would like an option to turn off the possible solutions when you hover over a field.
I think that makes things a little too easy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay, I really like these games. But from now on I'm going to give one less star until we finally get a next puzzle button. It's not about the two seconds it costs me. It's about how often this has been requested and how easy this should be to implement.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
People, please stop acting like spoiled opera divas. Alright, a next button would be convenient, but a lack of it does not signify "not caring about people who love and play his games". For god's sake, you have to click either one or two times more, an operation that I can perform in 0.2 seconds, and coupled with moving to mouse should still not take more than a second. Less than a second. That's what you lose, and I do not consider it enough to take a well-deserved point off this excellent puzzle collection. Five marks.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The most difficult part of these games is wading through the terrible guides and working out how to play them. And still no 'next' button.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There should be Hardcore button, that would hide the possible combinations that can go in this equation. Then it will make sense to have pencil marks, they're useless. It's too easy for my tastes.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't like the error checking. It simply compares to the solution instead of actually checking to see if you just have numbers that are used repeatedly so you can figure out the solution on your own.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For such a crappy game in terms of rules and how to play, I'm addicted, but only 'cos I wanna get the badge. Crap game; 15 points achievement. That doesn't fit. -.-
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
can we shut up about the little things? i play the levels starting from the last level to the first, it's a great game and who cares if it doesn't have a "next level" button, god forbid you have to click two extra times. and so what they used the same template as the other games? it's a good template about the little things?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A pretty decent game, but since the creator has completely disregarded the many suggestions for a "next puzzle" feature, I will vote a 2 for it. This has been a big problem in all the earlier games, and since it has still not been dealt with, I can't rate this game any higher
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
An option to not not show possible solutions in the window at the bottom would be a plus. The game is too easy, and therefore not really interesting, as it is. Also, here's another request for a "next puzzle" feature. With such a slick UI, the lack of this feature really stands out.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Another great game - sure, a next level button would be nice but I have no hesitation in scoring 5/5 as is. Can't wait for your next offering!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good concept, but it's not much of a challenge sadly. This, just as the other games are missing a button for "next puzzle". My guess is that the gui simply is copy and paste, with only changing the puzzles.
If you know your way around Sudoku, the math simply doesn't matter.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Can't tell if catpaw is trolling or just stupid... Anyway, the game is enjoyable, but like a few others, I'm disappointed they didn't fix some problems that were present in past games.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've played to full completion on all your other games but this one makes me so SAD. I have dyscalculia and there is about as much chance as me completing this game as there is of me flying to the moon.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Why isn't there an option to turn off the "possible numbers" below the puzzle? And why aren't you (developer) paying attention to critiques? Don't you want to make something better? Improve your existing game, or maybe avoid repeating the same "errors"?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
boring....stop making light packs instead of making hard pack....and also make better directions for people just starting the game I had to figure out myself what the numbers in the boxes at the start meant. also add a next puzzle button
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Anyone hoping for feedback from Conceptis puzzles should not hold out hope: Conceptis is a developer that lives independently of Kongregate at its own website. The creation of a Conceptis account on Kongregate is probably more of a brand-exposure move on the part of the developer than any honest outreach to any community of gamers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Comrade SOD - both 1+3 and 3+1 are valid solutions adding to 4. 2+2 is invalid because it would require more than a single 2 in the row, which breaks the rules.