Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wasn't expecting to see love again. At first when I saw it, it seemed shiny and new and special, but after a while I realised it was just like the last time around.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Do you have to do a certain something to get the 4000 point thing? I already got 4000+ points in 2 games and still have not yet received it
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That feel when I thought I was only the right half of the screen and still getting the badge.
Also that feel that it was on valentines... :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
While Love is an enjoyable distraction, I have come to the sad realization that in this game, the only winning move... is not to play.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I found a bug in infidelity... You can add your boxes on the line in the middle that would seperate the boxes... Like this you can hide in the wall and if youre very unlucky get 'hurt'. Hope you see this developer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sucks that this is a challenge with such an annoying bug. That pause bug should be fix and the challenge should be given again.
the "pause bug" ? What is it ? Sorry if it's been mentionned before, I haven't had the time to read all of today's comments yet (busy week at school :P ).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like to put both of my squares together in the middle in infidelity mode so that if we go down, at least we go down together.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Score-Submission still not working for me:
Windows7 with FireFox 9.0.1 and Flash 11.1.102.55
and no "Best so far" showing up... tryed with scores between 0 and 4.000
got a score with 8.480 - Nothing!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In regards to the "getting too close", don't you only die when you actually have a collision? That seems to be a fundamentally different event to simply getting closer, and the same thing applies to actual love: Becoming very, very close to a person (romantically or otherwise) is exhilarating, but dangerous. Not because being too close inevitably means you will be hurt, which it doesn't, but because it becomes more and more likely that you will have, as it were, a "collision".
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So, wait. Having four or five partners on the go at once is "love" but having split personalities that move in opposite directions is "infidelity"? I'm confused.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game has a nice sense when you fail. You can get hints for things you may need in rela life. This game will certainly help with tips in the game as well as in real life. Its a really wonderful game to play. The encouragemeant you get to try and get all 6 possibly 7 of the squares connected. Id certainly rate it 4.5/5 Great game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The main complain i would do is that in infedility mod, when only one of your squares touches only one square, the background turn white and so does both of your squares, so it just disappears and that's really annoying. Except for that, the game is fun ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is so wonderful.
definitely one of the best games i ever played.
the thoughts you think when playing are amazing, realizing how different strategies in relationships play out.
the only thing that bugs me out is that you lose once you let someone too close.
does this mean that deciding to spend your life with one partner is considered a negative thing?
because, allthough i see the benefits of switching partners/friends i can also see the benefits of sticking with one or more persons and thereby becoming one.
so maybe you could create a new game mode for that?
one where you can merge yourself with another square once you created a certain pointage of connection?
this could then spawn two new possible partners and increase your range [because two persons can reach a bigger group of people than one if they are in unity]