Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have just updated my rating to 1/5, because I have been trying over the past week to load this game to play, which I at one point had favourited, and just can not get it to load. Played it a number of times on Kong, and elsewhere, this is a new problem, which I have reported, incidentally, also a while ago.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the joker adds that subtle 'hey, why didn't someone think of this -before-?' element to a classic game. Nicely done :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nov. 08, 2009
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Pretty good concept. It's much easier than solitare, which would make it more relaxing for casual players. There doesn't seem to be much reward for playing harder though. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The world most definitely did not need another computer solitaire game. Dear god no. However, if such a beast had to be made this is how to do it. Slick and smart. Reluctant but well earned four stars.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice implementation of a "clasic" ... addictive.
AUTHOR ... suggest you make the "reward" for playing harder levels greater (typically highscores are on easiest levels) ... eg bonus at end for rounds compleated: Easy 1k, Med 2k and hard 3k x no of rounds compleated. Also, higher rewards for long runs, esp on Hard (as you can't see what's comming!).
All levels need more reward for really fast play - eg, i'm always getting between 330 and 360, so not really much difference.
Perhaps give double score for card if same suit as previous? (encourages you to try and take suit runs etc)
Also, can we not capture more stats in the high scores etc (eg longest run, quickest game, highest single round score etc - you have the stats, just pass them thro to the kong highscore table etc.)
Anyway, I'd give it 4.1, so it's got 5 star for encouragement!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
three peak perfection without the peaks, a little more pizzaz, and a longer time limit. Still I must say, nicely done.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dear god i spent WAY 2 long playing this in one run thinger i spent 50 mins and did 20 rounds 0.0 5/5 but god am i glad its finally over! lol (set high score for last 7 days 15th with 90,856)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Agree completely Scram... the reason these sort of card games are fun is that you don't know if you will be able to win or not. It's a combination of skill and luck...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think this game should come with some kind of rehab program because I am SO ADDICTED to it. Its like digital crack and I can't quit playing!! 5/5 Now if you make a game like 11up I would trade addictions to that game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You should need a pharmacist's license to dispense substances this addictive. Interesting discussion about the "finishing algorithm." While modern game design might suggest that it's necessary, when playing actual solitaire part of the pleasure is that victory is not assured. When you do complete, it feels all the more satisfying; when you fail, you just reshuffle the cards and start again. So I'm fine with one game ending in the first round, then the next going to round 6. I think I prefer it.