Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Single five, single five, single five, single five, single five, zilch. And then reckless wins in seven turns, having zilched twice.
This is why I hate luck-based games. The animations are nice, and the interface is good with the exception of no award descriptions or options. I dunno, it is what it is. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm not really a fan of games that are entirely based on chance, even Yatzee is acceptable since you have to plan where to put your dice scores in each spot, but for this you have no control accept whether you keep rolling or not. I played one game where I constantly only go single dice at a time and the 'easy' computer got 3000 points in the first two turns then finished the game with a 6000 point turn where it constantly rolled all five dice over and over again. And my deepest sympathies to Gaby
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wow. Most of the people commenting just have really crappy luck. I mean, you're having trouble getting the Easy badge? All you have to do is win... ONCE. The Medium badge is a fair deal harder because none of the individual rolls gives you more than 1500 (save for 4+ ones, and that's nigh-impossible). And the Hard badge? Just play for a while; your luck can't be so bad that you can't get 100 achievements.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok there's a game exactly like this on facebook this is very unoriginal. All a board game called 6 cubes that has a unique take on the game that is really fun. But make an original game instead of knock offs... I might give this a 4/5 if it wasn't a rip off of Farkel... instead I'm forced to halve that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If that 'Cautious' guy played like this in real life, I'm pretty sure he'd find himself being asked some very pointed questions in the basement of some casino.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game has really messed up "luck". Through the whole game i had been able only 2 or 3 times to bank the points. I don't mind having some bad luck, but computer on medium having rolls around 1k or more all the time and me Zilches is stupid.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Seriously, My oponnent had 7300 or smt i had 10950. he got 4k in a single turn or something around that adn still beat me, they get like always high amounts when im over 10k, that is a real game killer, seriously :s
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
did the dude who made this die? bec im not sure because of all those trolls on the internet...if so rest in peace dude
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Damn It's so annoying when I'm at like 10500 score and my opponent on 8500 or smt and he still manages to win! And this happens quite often.. Really funkiller.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
great that article is not there, type his name in and you will find he did in fact die, survived by his wife! once again RIP Gaby. He wasn't just a game dev. but had few other jobs also.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
here's the truth about whether this dev. is dead or not, he is plz read.
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/forstaff/news/article/2032/gabriel_gaby_vanhegan
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have played this game off and on when I have free time since 2009. I am sorry to hear that Gaby lost her life.
I didn't know her, I wouldn't mourn. But she was definitely gifted.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Both the 1500+freeroll should be 500+freeroll. They come up more often than you'd think. Otherwise game is fun/addicting/has good strategy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
sometimes the realist cpu gets 250 points with 1 or 2 dice left and he keeps trying to bank, bringing the game to a standstill.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it seems that reckless is actually twice as hard to beat as realist. WHY IS RECKLESS NOT WORSE AT GETTING MULTI-THOUSAND POINT COMBOS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So Im maintaining a steady lead the whole game, I finish my last roll, end at 11k, I'm up by like 8k points. The CPU then proceeds to roll 6 sixes, followed by a 5 4s and a 1, then a straight, then something like 3 1s at which point he banks about 9k points, taking the lead. wtf.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There's a flaw in the Realist tactic. If you roll quadruple 1 and double 5, it either counts as 3 pairs for 1500, or quad 1 + double 5 for 2100. The realist selects 1500 and rerolls, denying himself 600 free points. Also, rest in peace, Gaby.