Under rating threshold (hideshow)
im having trouble the game will not load for me at all i refreshed closed my browser and re opened and it will not work
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It took me about ten days to get the 100 awards in the game. But the game's award counter seems to be broken, and it still shows only 77. :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So because of the way quick select sometimes chooses only one instead of two of the possible dice, the cautious AI attempted to bank at 200 points, prompting the message that 'you can't'. Thus, the round soft-locked. One could still quit to menu, but I thought it was amusing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Kenaron, Reckless gets really lucky sometimes and really unlucky other times because it takes crazy risks. It's come from way behind to beat me, but other times I win by 9800 points because he gets so many zilches. If the computer is getting more re-rolls than you, it's because you play more cautiously than it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Enemy names should be Reckless -> Infuriating, Cautious -> Easy, Realist -> Hard. If you hate losing to bullshit luck, don't play Reckless. That dude cheats or something. The game is much better when you play against Cautious.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Keep a piece of paper on hand and check how often when you get a free-roll on 6 dice and when the computer does. By which I mean your very first toss is massive points plus a go-again, or when you earn a re-roll conventionally and then get that giant jackpot. Tell me the computer doesn't get nearly twice as many of these and tell me the random seed is fair.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I can't believe that the dice are random. They seem to suffer from mario kart syndrome, where if you're in the lead even the stupid AI's will get free rolls after free rolls after more free rolls.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
*tries to get the largest losing margin possible*
*gets 5500 points on my first term by spamming all the dice*
I lose when I'm trying to lose or win when I'm trying to win what is this
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
MPlayer22; other folks. Saddest, one of the saddest things on Kong: gaby is no longer alive. now even the multiplayer has turned off. this game involves random, that is the only reason i don't hurry making a remake. RIP, gaby; HF kong'erz!..
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is basically all luck ... the "skill" is just a matter of not playing stupidly, really. Fun game and well executed nonetheless ... just not exactly as advertised.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To all you doom-laden cynics: the luck runs both ways you know. I just played a game where Reckless was on 9,700 & I was stuck on 7,050 but then he rolled about 6 Zilches (minus 1,000 points) and I caught him and won. Gaby made a great game but is still being criticised by others' ignorance of the word 'random'!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
TIP: don't play reckless. that sumbi+ch is a dirty cheater. rolls 123456 two times in a row, banks 4k in one turn to take the lead...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't know if it's possible for someone close to Gaby to update this (so we can have multiplayer back) but I would love for that to happen :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the equation is wrong it should be x=y*2^n-2 should be the equation in the scoring section.
Rolling 3 fours scores 200 which fits because
200=200^3-2
but rolling 4 fours scores 400
and 400=/=200^4-2.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If you end up in a tie it does not count as winning or losing for any of the badges including the close win and close lose badges. Also, as mentioned by others, the tracking for the hard badge is way off. It seems to go up while you earn during play and then go back to 79 if you have to reload later.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You know, the last few times I checked my progress under "Fool's Gold Badge," it said my current progress was 82, then 80, now 79. When I count them myself, the game says I've won 97/120. Ouch. Those of you playing right now might want to take note!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Vortigon: Actually, three 2s is bad but it's not the worst unless you already have points in the bank for that turn. The worst is to keep rolling fives until you get to four of them and it's still only 200 points. When you're at three dice in bank, you always have the chance to roll three of any number and then roll again. When you have four, that chance is gone and you're just stuck wishing for a miracle, lol.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I was winning by 5,000 points. I had over 10,000 points. Then in the final round the other guy got amazing luck and somehow beat me
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
reckless is unbeatable its really annoying he has won the past 12 games against me even when i just go for three hundred and bank i get a zilch every other round