Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Necronomicon - Book of Dead Names

« Back to Necronomicon - Book of Dead Names

Solon_Mega

Oct. 04, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) I would sell my soul to azatoth for another version of this game.

+ - !

(2)

Jantonaitis

Sep. 22, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) There's no ending?

+ - !

(2)

Shredderslicer

Jul. 30, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) Extremely unbalanced

+ - !

(2)

Ankush_Paul

May. 15, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) Many cards not working properly Raid doesn't remove opponents character

+ - !

(0)

BrunomasterX

Apr. 15, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) I just beat Great Chtulhu by driving it to suicidal insanity. The madness spreads.

+ - !

(3)

seetami321

Apr. 09, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) Pure Magic achievement is not triggering properly. I've had several magic/taint wins even without any creature damage and still don't have that one. What gives?

+ - !

(3)

mimeo

Mar. 24, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) twice lost...

+ - !

(-1)

LieutenantSpeedy

Mar. 23, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) There is a bug when you discard it should remove taint instead it adds it

+ - !

(0)

megakirbymon

Mar. 13, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) this is 4uckin retarded

+ - !

(-1)

LiosRa

Mar. 01, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) *cough* You misspelled Nyarlathotep. *cough*

+ - !

(1)

scott_wilson

Feb. 10, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) Why cant I edit the deck used

+ - !

(1)

kennypark

Feb. 08, 2016

Under rating threshold (show) Well... Interesting fact: you can get "S" rank even when you lose ;) odd

+ - !

(2)

Nikiyasha

Nov. 03, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) This game isn't bad, but it's still a disappointment when compared to the original. This one is too easy, the sanity system is...well, pointless and the grading system is a bit uneven (S rank is too easy to earn).

+ - !

(3)

neemhons2

Oct. 10, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) i lost yet i still got s rank. so all you need is 70 score to get s rank not a win?

+ - !

(1)

Iothil

Aug. 09, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) It would be helpful to clarify what the hell I am supposed to do in order to reach a higher rank on a mission.

+ - !

(1)

synnabun

Aug. 08, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) why does the discreet doctor look like donald trump

+ - !

(-1)

zugrook

Jun. 18, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) what is my insanity?, this game could be so much better with attention to detail.

+ - !

(1)

zugrook

Jun. 18, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Can be better, i.e. read the card locations

+ - !

(1)

PauliinaL

Jun. 09, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Nice. It didn't save my game from yesterday and now I need to start all over again...

+ - !

(1)

MadCrimson

May. 07, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) I don't like that I can worsen the result in a level. :-/

+ - !

(0)

ariel1313

Apr. 18, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) I got an S rank from losing. I think if you lose you should automatically get an F. Unless this was intentional, of course.

+ - !

(5)

elmotinak

Mar. 04, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) the game is insanely easy. Just beat some levels and go back to the first one to get an S rank Then get an S rank on the next levels and you have a huge andvantage over your opponent

+ - !

(1)

John_Paulo

Feb. 22, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) i can't attack,help

+ - !

(-1)

Kebabzavr

Feb. 16, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) This game is a huge step back in comparison with the original one.

+ - !

(8)

nockamixon4

Feb. 07, 2015

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

joor79

Feb. 04, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) please please please make a third

+ - !

(1)

desciclope666

Sep. 13, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) how do i edit my cards?

+ - !

(0)

rinkaiho

Aug. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Gaining sanity from discarding basically makes damaging opponent's sanity ineffective. If the effect of discarding is greater than the effect of damaging sanity, why would you want to do that? Attack twice, defend once, sound like a good deal? :D

+ - !

(-1)

rinkaiho

Aug. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Continuation to previous: With the evolution of the structure the total balance of the game has shifted from ritualism to normality, from insane to the sane. Consider the old structure: Creature, Elder, Insanity, Life, Taint... New structure: Elder, Insanity, Life, Taint, Character, Location, Book, Att1, Att2, Def1,Def2, Item.

+ - !

(-1)

rinkaiho

Aug. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) The more complicated structure is ambitious and I hope the game will progress, for it has nice potential. But thematically I think it should not leave obscurity, madness, crazy rituals and an outlook where the mundane and sane are the mi-go doctors, craftsmen of sand and dust.

+ - !

(-1)

rinkaiho

Aug. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Seems the game's structure has evolved and become more analytical. However unfortunately in the process some of the graphics and mechanics also cause a mood/thematic penalty. In this game mood is more important than detail. Idea level design concept is brilliant, but the mathematical final product is subpar.. structures, characters, locations.. Brilliant. Creatures' attackers/defenders system I dont personally like. It takes a great amount of skill to produce a dynamic system with the points, in the previous version the insanity system was great. Miskatonic university... Then bulletproof vest. Look at the artwork, and just ask yourself..

+ - !

(-1)

NazgulKortex

Jun. 05, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Cthulhu Mythos FTW!!

+ - !

(-1)

Deputy276

May. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Well I got "S" in every square. What happens next? Or is that as good as it gets?

+ - !

(2)

Grandarbiter

May. 12, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Personally, I absolutely loved the original, but find this sequel to be a bit lacking. Other people already mentioned the old sanity system, but it's just that the whole fast pacing of the predecessor is lost, and that's quite a shame. Also, there are some cards with artwork that absolutely don't match the great Lovecraftian horror setting that the original matched so well. 3/5, maybe had been a 4/5 it is was not a sequel. Especially a sequal to a game I easily rated 5/5.

+ - !

(0)

Reggaeguy

Apr. 29, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Got it! some cards are marked with a black star-like shaped figure in the right corner, such as "The Dunwich Horror" these kind of cards connect the stars. On the other hand there are some with white star-like shaped figures, such as "Dawn of a new day", these erase the connection between stars. Rate up if it helped, so others can see this.

+ - !

(10)

cujo5150

Apr. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) To fill the slot for the great old one, 3 cards with a black star on them must be played. If a card with a white star is played, then a star will be removed.

+ - !

(4)

PHATPAT666

Apr. 13, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) woohoo!!

+ - !

(0)

Reggaeguy

Apr. 07, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I've noticed that there's a slot for "The great Old one" and sometimes the stars glow and connect... How can I connect all the stars?

+ - !

(3)

Clove451

Mar. 03, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I miss the different insanity effects and some of the high-powered cards. I liked a lot of the changes to gameplay, but I miss many of the old cards. Also, it could use some badges. It's going in the right direction, but I agree it's not a "true successor."

+ - !

(7)

eaglenumber6

Mar. 02, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) way to much luck involved. If your opponent gets Dunwich Horror early, and you never get any banish cards or defense cards, you're screwed.

+ - !

(2)

Treedragon

Feb. 03, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I probably wouldn't like this game as much if I was not a fan of Lovecraft's stories.

+ - !

(1)

828burke

Jan. 11, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) the new art is crap, dumb sanity, crappy new mechanics

+ - !

(-1)

allenme

Dec. 28, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) Disappointing. My favorite part of the original was the insanities, and I loved just charging at the guy and not caring if I went insane. I played, planning to go insane

+ - !

(1)

rudolfalex

Dec. 01, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) A weakened sequel, despite the presence of noticeable attempts to improve the game

+ - !

(1)

cecmk5

Nov. 03, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) So when am I getting the ability to modify my deck? The card that give one taint to my opponent is worthless after a few dozen life are added and some card I want more than one of.

+ - !

(5)

Inuichi

Nov. 02, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) Some of the achievements don't seem to trigger properly. I.E. I just took out an opponent without dropping a single physical attack card, yet I still did not get the "pure magic" achievement. And the "beat someone while suicidal" is impossible if you have enough S ranks that you never go insane.

+ - !

(6)

fourshade

Oct. 09, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) For a "CCG" (notice the quotation marks), this game is too random and the computer is too stupid. At the start when life totals are low, the computer can easily own you in 4 moves if he gets a bunch of damage cards and you don't. But he also makes incredibly stupid moves, like using Betrayal when you have no monsters or Doppelganger when your stats are all worse than his. Also, gettintg S ranks is hell early on and trivial later since your life/sanity (and hence score) goes up but the scoring thresholds don't.

+ - !

(3)

Kbotit

Aug. 23, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) don't know if it's been said already....why can I "live/die" but if computer goes insane the same rules don't apply?

+ - !

(2)

AlecA2

Aug. 14, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) why isnt this a real game ?

+ - !

(2)

LaFlibuste

Jul. 29, 2013

Under rating threshold (show) I can't help but feel like playing mirror deck kinda sucks... The theme is interesting but the game itself feels a bit underdevelopped...

+ - !

(3)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate