Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The rating in this game is as follows: If it has like 50 ratings, and only 1 star, you know its a good player, because he pissed off alot of players :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I find it hilarious every time I go to rate a player 5/5 (just so I'll know next time I run into them), I find they have like 50+ 1/5 ratings. LMAO butthurt much? "Waaaah you're better than me and took my money, I hate you imma rate you 1/5 hahaha gottem!"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What a bunch of rude , ugly , miserable players that really ruin this game. Such a shame cause game is great. The players are terrible and use disgusting language. This game wont advance cause its players cheat , too many teams, too many players selling chips. And game owner must be blind or dont care about the game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I dont care about exp and leveling, its a bit annoying to see every hand how much exp you've earned in such a visual way... Make it a option so we can turn that off...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Maybe nicely made graphically speaking, but statistically it sucks. Shared cards most of the time lead to a straight or a flush... 3 of a kind, 2 pairs are rare, fulls are very rare (but in that case it's quite normal). Finally, the way the game is made, you only have to have the right card at the right time to complete a straight or a flush. If you want to plan on a good pair or two pairs you get most of the time ruined by a 4 cards straight or flush.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The truth about this game : If you don't buy chips from the site , and you playing vs someone who has bought chips from the site, YOU WILL LOSE.
If you buy chips from the site , you will beat others who have not. Also the app as its players that work for the game to beat you , so you will buy again. So if you think its a fair game , it is totally NOT. So before you start playing this game you have been WARNED.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As a suggestion would be useful if after a all-in a player will have to wait for 3 rounds (or other number) it would prevent people for beaing all-in all the time and make the game more fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
had a good run with the game but some how it just stop working can't log in glad I didn't buy any kreds with my money
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice job removing your fresh deck poker game from my laptop. Apparently, not enough brain power in your IT department. If I owned the game, they would no longer be employed. Since I don't, I have the power to never use/play anything from you. Morons.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
garbage as fck....piece of sht game played by dumbaszes and a shity azs random generator thats not "BS"....false advertising
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There must be a way to make it more difficult to get chips to play with. There's not point in playing poker when everyone has tons of free chips to throw around.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Any chance of getting 9-ring games for the range of stakes, instead of just 6? The popularity (regular fullness) of the 9-ring games suggests that they would work at other stakes as well.
Also, other games (Omaha, stud, etc.) would be nice if you could fit them in :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Everybody is all in every time (tried multiple rooms). Not fun when you just joined a room and have 1/10 of what some players have and they constantly bet high amounts.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How come every time I go all in the god dam game kicks out I loose all my chips and cant ever see who won the hand. I think it folds my hand at max bet. 8 times today. Bullshit
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Awesome graphics, but poor winning stats. Not realistic enough with the odds given. Game rigged to loose until you spend money.