Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For disclaimer to my previous comment, I was only pointing out that my connection between my example and "fairness" is not solid at all. In fact, I didn't mention anything about the morality of the examples as a flawed thing to the real world. Please understand the message behind early comments :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree with you. The examples I have given are just too weak to support part of my argument. I'm very sorry for the inconvenience that I gave you through my words. However, the other two comments of fairness will still take place as a response toward your comment and to the developers of the game. Have a great day:)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok first of all, Islam is only taught peacefully here in the western world, which makes up about 10% of Muslims, so they are not abusing the name of Islam, if anything ISIS is the real Islam, if you look back at Muhammad he was Peaceful in Mecca his home town for about 10 years until he decided "peace" wasn't working so they took the violent approach giving them an Empire, Islam is in no way Peaceful, western Islam is, and that is to gain acceptance, you think I do not know what they are doing, in fact I am pegged an enemy of Muslims by being Christian, an Infidel who "must die" according to the Quran
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a strategy game, and the community wants a fairness to have a perfect logical conclusion when it comes to "win-and-lose" results. They do not want the developers to interfere the whole game by adding premium contents and block-off the other users from the user maps. That's abusing power against then, which is a ideal of "Authority over logic (game itself)" or "Authority over fairness". Who would ever support that kind of nasty thing?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
By the way, can I share a little about one of the quote that you gave, "The World isn't fair, get over with it."? The idea that the world isn't fair can't justify the fairness as a little fallacy when it comes to competence ( such as hiring or official competition), unless the justification of either the name of Liberty or peace comes to hand. Did you ever see a time when US and Europe will give ISIS a chance to prepare for a war, while the ISIS will continue killing innocent people and abuse the name of Islam? Did you ever think that it was necessary to not support a charity for poor people, just because that the world was unfair and that you wanted to keep the money for your own sake?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ ConnarKenning It seems that you contradicted your argument when you said that unfairness must go, even though you're trying to criticize the ideology of fairness. Let me get you straight and clear. The antonym of unfairness is a thing called fairness. Fairness can be achieved by giving same circumstance, resource, and support at the first place, especially in strategy or tactic genre. However, the way of management or development will be on player's hand, which can be carried in million possibilities of different game plays. This rule will be ruined if the pay 2 win methods are applied to the game, which can be only achieved throughout real currency.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be better if the alliance would be permanent after 10 rounds cause i help 2 of my allies for 100+ round until they are very powerful and in the end they betrayed me
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
you guys want fairness? jeez all the excitement comes from when you beat the enemy who is bigger and stronger than you.
The world isn't fair get over it. Now I am not saying completely unfairness should stay, that must go, what I mean by complete unfairness, is like a zombie game that the zombies start out with like 400 troops each that are broken up into spots of 50 and 70, and can get passed walls without having to attack them. What is not total unfairness is like if they start out with 100 more spread out in spots of 10 or 5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As Rover said but possibly maybe that premium players get them much easier then non premium players who have to pay lots of sp.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is truly a brilliant design, and unlike some claim it is mostly balanced if you know what you're doing. My only real complaints involve the premium perks, which can on occasion provide severely unfair advantages. Most notable in this category are the Desert Storm's unique ability allowing helicopters to carry Marines, along with the other premium tactics. These is just the most noticeable advantage, the others (like the general) are less noticeable. Since unobtainable gameplay changes like this tend to frustrate players, and even premiums agree that it's little fun to have no one to fight, I'd suggest removing "premium tactics", and making them available to all, or return them to the drawing board. Another option would be to limit premium perks, tactics, and generals to premium-only games, so non-premium players don't need to worry about premium players doing things they can't.
Apologies for extensive comment, but this is normal for games I enjoy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i agree. The premium membership really takes away from the enjoyment of the game. It is unbalanced how some peple get mroe options than others. I would suggest taking ti away, and having a donation option. I am sure many would like to donate, since this is such a great game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Vaerturk he, and most other people, want to be able to access different maps besides the world map. That's how it used understand the devs need money but no everything needs to be payed for
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've been trying to report a bug for a while but to no avail. I am using a mac and for someone the chat function does not work. i can type into the chat bar but pressing enter does not send it. I have reported this bug many times throughout the years but haven't even gotten a response. perhaps i am pressing the wrong key? (enter for a pc or linux but ? for a mac?)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@cpybbb what he said wasnt really a point my friend, what i dont understand is what was his goal in that statement was it a piece of an argument? or just idk a piece of info thats my problem what was his point in that
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
they just split USA into regions just like China, Russia, Brazil, Canada and Australia since they are large Countries with many cities. besides we don't want any overpowered players at the start of the game :s
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@radicilep you're an idiot. you probably attacked a well defnded city directly with an Air Transport. You're supposed to drop off the troops thy carry near the city u are attacking and ten move them by ground.