Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well, the concept of making objects disappear by bringing two identical peices together is not that new, but at least this is a nice variety, really fun to play.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great concept! Original idea and it oozes polish! The soundtrack is top-notch because you don't really notice it's there, but you'd definitely notice its absence. Just a bit more in the way of explaining the mechanics would help me feel like I wasn't just randomly clicking my way through the first few levels, but other than that this is an A-class game! I'm not huge into this type of puzzler, but it gets a 5/5 for being solid and pretty to look at and listen to. Well done!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's fun, I like it, visuals & music are great. I have played an older game like this here on on Kong, can't remember name, but this is definetly improved upon. 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My mind can't quite grok the way in which the colors cancel one another out and how the links reconstitute themselves as necessary, but that's just the mark of this being a clever *new* game, and one that I look forward to jumping back into once my brain decompresses a bit. 4/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice game, I like the game play. Actually becomes easier as you learn how to look at things. Good puzzle game....original is always nice. Maybe a little too easy, 50 levels, and I have 48 of them done in just a couple hours. Could have been a bit more challenging.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not original at all. Most of the levels were completed in a "Was I supposed to do that?" fashion. A few of the levels took 10+ tries, at which point the strategy became more mastermind than anything else. Clicking every possible order of connections until one permutation worked. Polished game, but lacking substance.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Very original - I like the way that, even now I've finished the game, I can't quite figure out what the rules are :) There's a satisfying vagueness about it all. Only criticism iI could make is that the levels don't seem to advance very linearly - IMO there are a handful of levels in the middle that were more of a sticking point than the later levels.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Really, really good game. Like the cut and colour paints, and all the other specials, original, too. 5/5, that for sure ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
levels are too easy, when you start a level there are only about 3 different things you can do most times, after each one of those only about 3 and then like 2 so theres only like 18 things you can do and you know some are just dumb so it only takes like 40 seconds to figure out a level, too easy
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is really interesting. I never seen a game like this for a long time, and it's quite fun for an original game. Mainly, the concept and idea of this game was brought up really well; making this enjoyable. Nice job.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Completed the game with a score of 500 in one session without even understanding the rules. Too easy to just randomly click your way through. Fantastic game artistically, executed fluidly, but the concept behind the puzzle, while original, is simply too easy. It also feels like it's set up in such a way that it encourages brute-force attempts by not penalizing multiple tries on the same board and allowing you to instantly start over.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This was a fun game, I got all the way to level 39. Then I had to get off the computer. No save feature FTL. Only 3/5 for the frustration of losing everything.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Quite an original game, but i dont think the instructions in-game help that much. By lvl 20 i found my self randomly clicking on anything with two colors together. I think it was a really nice game but the majority of the time i had no idea what was going on. This is definatly one of those games that is a rare find, Awesome & But confusing to me. 5/5!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Rated 5/5 until I saw I had to have a facebook account and jump through facebook hoops to see the "official walkthrough." Google video search served much better. 1/5 for sheer stupidity in an otherwise perfect game