Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Castlewars

« Back to Castlewars

ThirstyPirana

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Wow. I thought it was pretty hard. Clever idea, but i don't like the card-style execution.

+ - !

(0)

JouninOfDespair

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) This reminds me of AcroMage on a game called Might & Magic VII For blood & honour...

+ - !

(0)

AbeLincoln2

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) One of my favorite games ever, keep it up! 5/5.

+ - !

(0)

nomegusta42

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Right, I love Ants, and adding netplay is great and all, but I simply cannot give anything but a low rating to a copied game when it's posted to a site that gives out cash prizes. Cash prizes that are supposed to go to hard-working and innovative game developers. I'm sure plenty of effort went into coding this, but aside from a couple minor changes (e.g.: cost of the Curse card), it's a nearly-exact clone with a new name. Even the images and sounds are the same. I think the most important part of a game is the design -- that's where real creativity and effort is evident -- and you have shown us very little in the design department. No offense, m0rkeulv, I think it's very well put together, and it's always great to see Flash games with an online multiplayer element, but I just really don't think you deserve a cash prize for this submission, so I'm voting this a 1.

+ - !

(0)

Catbus

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Epic Idea, Horrible Execution.

+ - !

(0)

Rinjin

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) the multiplayer online doesnt work for me either

+ - !

(0)

Servantes

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) i can't play on multiplayer.. :( anyone helps me?

+ - !

(0)

capo

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) nice game, but as many people have mentioned it depends more on luck than strategy.

+ - !

(0)

Servantes

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I had played msdos version of game.. It's fun =)

+ - !

(0)

ArcadePanic

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Too reliant on random luck, and you should be abe to disard two or three cards in one turn to make it worth it.

+ - !

(0)

Seolyk

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) fun game to play, but the net mode doesnt seem to work.

+ - !

(0)

unproductive

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Far too dependent on luck and too little strategy.

+ - !

(0)

Kudjo

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Reminds me of "Arcomage" game or something like that; it's a minigame in "Might&Magic 8". Pretty like that :)

+ - !

(0)

harmless

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Too luck based--too little strategy, too much depending on good cards to show up.

+ - !

(0)

Crushproof

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) That'll be 6/7 Jas =D (Don't worry, you'll kick my ass one day)

+ - !

(0)

Covergirl

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) love this game so much. crushproof is the best player. 6 games won. 5 in a row!

+ - !

(0)

Neganti

Jun. 02, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) this would be good but, like everyone is saying, the deck distibution is wacked. I never got a fence card the first match (but the computer got plenty) and the second match the computer got at least 3 Babylon cards and I got 0.

+ - !

(0)

motris

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Deck balance seems a bit off; also, instead of discarding one card, you should definitely be able to discard your whole hand, or at least 2/3 cards. It seems you spend many many turns doing very little until you finally get the powerful cards.

+ - !

(0)

Asmo

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) not bad.. should be able to discard more than one card in a turn.

+ - !

(0)

RobotChicken

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Pretty sweet game, fun to play as a time waster.

+ - !

(0)

Talinn

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) A lil bit of balance is the difference between this and a really incredible game.

+ - !

(0)

illogicaljoker

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I do like the idea and design, but the cards themselves are unbalanced: the costs need to change and there needs to be more of a difference between start game and end game. (For instance, "Curse" is far too powerful.)

+ - !

(0)

kingicet

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) theres so many small cards that have so little use its boring. there r 2 many small cards and too little big cards. its all luck. if u get a good card,when, you have the big amount of whatever then your set. its so boring

+ - !

(0)

augusto_salmon

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Another flaw. It lacks attacking cards, so the game just takes forever.

+ - !

(-1)

augusto_salmon

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Seriously, PLEASE do something about the bricks. They are the easiest to earn and the ones that take less to do something. Whenever you're almost winning, your opponent just use a Fort card and rebuilds the entire castle. PLEASE FIX THE EASY BRICK BUILDING!

+ - !

(-1)

foulmouthboy

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I'd like to see some cards that would allow you to manipulate the opponents cards. Like a steal a card thing, or force a discard. Potentially open it up for cards to work in conjunction with each other.

+ - !

(-1)

ZypherINC

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) correction, not the same, but incredibly similar :P couldn't you have at least made new cards?

+ - !

(-1)

ZypherINC

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I love this game and all, but this is like a generic version of the game "Ants" by gemtree sofware made with the peter programming tool. Great work on the game though :P isn't one of the requirements to be your own work? those cards are the same images from Ants... http://www.gemtree.com/SHOOT/ants.gif

+ - !

(0)

Pooter

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) 5/5 Great job - looking forward to updates.

+ - !

(0)

xUrikx

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Good balance of skill/luck, and I think the strategy level for the average gamer is very good, I personally tend to dislike games with to much of an emphasis on strategy.

+ - !

(0)

triviumhead

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) pretty kool game

+ - !

(0)

worldslaya12

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) also agree with everyone elses comments

+ - !

(0)

worldslaya12

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) 4/5*

+ - !

(0)

worldslaya12

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) would be better if it let u play even when there were so many people and maybe more rooms would help too but anyway beside that it was still a really good game i give it a 4/4

+ - !

(0)

Covergirl

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) luv luv luv it so much!

+ - !

(0)

Sacra

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Great game...kongregate could organise a tournment!

+ - !

(0)

CrushU

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) All you need to make this a great game is the ability to discard several cards at a time. Additionally; Does this game have a 'Deck' that it pulls from, or does it just generate cards randomly? If it generates randomly, I would assume certain cards are weighted to not show as often... Make the Conjures not show as often. >.> I keep ending up with six in my hand.

+ - !

(0)

jasond315

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I think the luck/skill ratio is fine. first you have to get the luck (to get the cards you need) then you use your skill to use the cards effectively. Take out the luck, and the same people win over and over.

+ - !

(0)

benjaminx

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) There's not nearly enough strategy

+ - !

(0)

TaigaKirdApe

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I like the turn-based aspect, but I'd like to see more balance between skill and luck. And the ability to discard multiple cards per turn.

+ - !

(0)

Dbdeluxe

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) This game is cool, I especially like the net play aspect

+ - !

(0)

squidsquid

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Its pretty good. After a few plays against the computer I feel the result is a bit too dependant on who gets more "recruit" cards.

+ - !

(0)

ereg

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) i like it, it gets the ereg stamp of awesome

+ - !

(0)

Legomania

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) yeah, it's really too random... It needs more strategy

+ - !

(0)

sf23

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) online play is great, maybe setting up a kongregate room? *ahem ahem*

+ - !

(0)

mastabruce

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) really fun strategy game. Kinda hard to understand at first, but its a lot of fun. I like the online capabilities.

+ - !

(0)

Kaushik

Jun. 01, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) Really Addictive

+ - !

(0)

djsilt

May. 31, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) really nice game !

+ - !

(0)

effward

May. 31, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I am super addicted to this game, the fact that there is online play makes it about 10000x better. I only wish the "random" dealing was more fair, there have been games where I have had zero curses, and my opponent got 4 in a row.

+ - !

(0)

fuzzytears

May. 31, 2007

Under rating threshold (show) I'm completely hooked. I've been playing this for 3 days. I would really like to see a wider variety of cards but for a v1.0 this is excellent. maybe in the next one there can be some updated animations... builders building the walls, dragon for the dragon etc. Great game though.

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate