Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just to answer feareds dumb question just because its called the white castle doesnt literally mean its a ginat white castle i mean for all we know it could be a hotel or a gift shop
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I hate this game with every fiber of my being.
Honestly, I loved it for awhile. But I just got a game, that made me hate it. I don't even want to go into detail. Just, thinking about it makes me want to pinch an innocent child. Out of alllll the attack cards in my deck, I couldn't get one decent one in thirty friggin' turns. I loathe this game. It needs to be much more skill based, and less luck.
However, I respect he work the creator put into it. And before this game I rated it 5/5. I will keep the rating due to the fun I *DID* have with the game. However, the one game I just finished ruined any glimmer of me even scrolling over this game again. Pardon my rant, it really was a fun game, but now I will crawl into a corner and die. That will be all.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I recall playing this exact game from an old Might & Magic PC game. MMVI, maybe? I can't remember specifically. Anyway, it was fun, but you might want to credit the original concept and refer to it more as an adaptation than an original game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So uh. Anyone here familiar with the Might and Magic series? Because this is just Arcomage, a minigame involved in that game.
... oh, except that the graphics are much better in the original.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcomage
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is fairly entertaining but has too many issues. For example I logged in again started a match and I was with the default deck. That made me loose my 3wins 0losses score. bummer. Plus am I the only one who notices the knight card is utterly retarded??? It costs the same as the spider but attack for 3 instead of 4.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is by far the worst game ever to be on the front page of Kongregate. It is very poorly made and has way too many bugs. Values in the cards were rather thoughtless. Overall, it looks like it was made by a 8 year old. I found absolutely no enjoyment in this game, and I am not hard to entertain. I HATE to see this game on the front page every time I log on to Kongregate, and I will NOT return until this is over. Thank you and GOOD DAY.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
underthepale, this game, as opposed to other games like it.. has a deck builder.. which like in 90% of colectible card games the strategy comes in deck preparation, so...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ctrl+click does not discard. Computer opponents often stop taking any actions (I assume this means they have a full hand and can't discard). Multiplayer play is sub-par at best because it suffers from the same issues. 2/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have always despised this game. There is limited strategy, you just need to hope you get good cards, though if anything good comes up, expect the computer to play it. It's almost completely random. Words fail me as to how much I hate this thing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is so much fun, I used to be obsessed with it and i think after doing the challenge it's kicking back in. I hope they add a bunch of badges to this game 'cuz I can't stop playing it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is based far too highly on luck.
The AI seems to get just the right cards at any given time, making it impossible to lower its castle past 25. Not even going to try multiplayer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The single player game is getting stuck whenever either I or the computer needs to discard. I played the game yesterday and it wasn't happening then.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The medium badge was actually really easy for me to get. No one suddenly left the game when they were about to lose. Try talking to your opponent and being friendly, and maybe they won"t quit on you?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As mrwest mentioned, what is the point of taking the time to build your own deck if the computer uses the same one? Not as fun when it's based on luck of the draw...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
All you ignorants pressing minuses to my previous comment, explain pls how I almost lose a game where I cast 7 curses to the AI, having 10+ Builders, soldiers and magic as opposed to ~5 of the AI, and having almost 900 bricks, 600 weapons and 400 crystals and the AI keep pulling out damage cards, and I didn't got ANY good damage cards in around 100 turns or even more. I purposely didnt want to win with building 100 castle - I wanted to crush the AI to the ground. And it just didnt gave me almost no good damage card, surviving almost without resources in around 100 turns, and nearly beated me. Random chance? Dont make me laugh! The A.I. is cheating, and thats not going to change no matter how minuses you give to my comments. Cheers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fun game, very nostalgic, I remember playing Ants back when Dial Up was the big thing XD Would love to see some one take the basic game and stylize it with some awesome graphics and animations.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wth??? I just went against someone who spent kreds on this game! what a loser! kreds are a waste of money, it's a FREE game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If you change your deck and get rid of the shitty cards and replace them with mages/soldiers/builders, its easy to win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
its a good game, but there are a few flaws:
i never start off with enolugh supply to use any cards,
if i get something such as 8 bricks for my castle ONLY then will the castel attack me.
if it isint attacking me its crushing nothing or stealing nothing because i start off with bearly any supplys