Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It is physically impossible to earn the badge when you can't even connect to the servers. There is no way to earn the badge. This badge should be removed.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Permanently "The connection to the server was lost"... I play a single game vs. computer. WTF? Game looks quite antiquated, saw better implementations. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I currently have 10,000+ crystals (game with only sorcerer and conjure crystal cards) and am wondering if there is a limit to the #. Anybody know if there is?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
her it was i was on 1 castle and 9 fence him on 98 castle 22 fence i had 123 crystals and 12 magic ... im getting nothing but crushes and conjures that i dont need then... BAM i get 4 pixies in a row then a dragon then that one last pixie to WIN!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok game for some reason when I would chat on multiplayer it would not let me click on the cards anymore figured out that I could still discard and then it was fine again and stopped chatting from then on. Saw in multiplayer there were other cards but not sure how to get them might have had to have a profile not sure. Would be nice in a later game to have a quest type thing were as you work your way up you unlock new better cards. But ok start.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Why do you need to pay Kreds just to get color tweaker or a new card? Why would I spend money on that? And how come whenever someone is about to lose they just quit? The medium badge should be an impossible badge because I never win cause everyone bad quits. m0rkeulv, you need to make it so when your opponent quits in mid-game, then you should get a win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really just keep finding more are more faults with this game.
Other than the previously commented problem of people leaving and never getting a win, the random distribution of cards is hardly random. I had to stop playing and open a new game because I ONLY got conjure x and crush x cards for at least 20 turns. Way too much luck with little to no skill. Other games deserve much more attention and badges than this quickly meshed together mini-game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@talal818 heh, that's funny, I was watching a thing about white castle. It's called white castle because white means cleanliness and castle to represent power.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just to answer feareds dumb question just because its called the white castle doesnt literally mean its a ginat white castle i mean for all we know it could be a hotel or a gift shop
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I hate this game with every fiber of my being.
Honestly, I loved it for awhile. But I just got a game, that made me hate it. I don't even want to go into detail. Just, thinking about it makes me want to pinch an innocent child. Out of alllll the attack cards in my deck, I couldn't get one decent one in thirty friggin' turns. I loathe this game. It needs to be much more skill based, and less luck.
However, I respect he work the creator put into it. And before this game I rated it 5/5. I will keep the rating due to the fun I *DID* have with the game. However, the one game I just finished ruined any glimmer of me even scrolling over this game again. Pardon my rant, it really was a fun game, but now I will crawl into a corner and die. That will be all.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I recall playing this exact game from an old Might & Magic PC game. MMVI, maybe? I can't remember specifically. Anyway, it was fun, but you might want to credit the original concept and refer to it more as an adaptation than an original game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So uh. Anyone here familiar with the Might and Magic series? Because this is just Arcomage, a minigame involved in that game.
... oh, except that the graphics are much better in the original.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcomage
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is fairly entertaining but has too many issues. For example I logged in again started a match and I was with the default deck. That made me loose my 3wins 0losses score. bummer. Plus am I the only one who notices the knight card is utterly retarded??? It costs the same as the spider but attack for 3 instead of 4.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is by far the worst game ever to be on the front page of Kongregate. It is very poorly made and has way too many bugs. Values in the cards were rather thoughtless. Overall, it looks like it was made by a 8 year old. I found absolutely no enjoyment in this game, and I am not hard to entertain. I HATE to see this game on the front page every time I log on to Kongregate, and I will NOT return until this is over. Thank you and GOOD DAY.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
underthepale, this game, as opposed to other games like it.. has a deck builder.. which like in 90% of colectible card games the strategy comes in deck preparation, so...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ctrl+click does not discard. Computer opponents often stop taking any actions (I assume this means they have a full hand and can't discard). Multiplayer play is sub-par at best because it suffers from the same issues. 2/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have always despised this game. There is limited strategy, you just need to hope you get good cards, though if anything good comes up, expect the computer to play it. It's almost completely random. Words fail me as to how much I hate this thing.