Under rating threshold (hideshow)
great concept, too bad the advanced levels were too big for the screen. I was really enjoying myself until the master levels, after two of those, straining to read numbers, i put it down. Grand Master, ha, you would need a full screen. 3/5, and what a shame, the concept was so good.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I totally agree with TBTabby. There's too much guessing which destroys the beauty of a puzzle game. Colours are a good addition to the game, but there should be some kind of indication to state whether the different colours are separated or together. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like that you tried to put a new teist on Picross, but it runs into a problem when squares of different colors are nect to each other in a puzzle. If I see two ones of different colors in a row, and I've found one, I instinctively place X's on either side. But since squares of differnet colors care listed seperately even when they're next to each other, that no longer works, and I'm forced to guess where they are mor eoften. And guessing is no way to play Picross.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I LOVE this game. I have bought those GAMES puzzles books for years only to do these. I only have one complaint. It's too easy to move the mouse to far are be penalized an entire minute. There shouldn't be a penalty for filling in a square incorrectly. Especially on the harder boards, part of figuring it out is making mistakes and then going back and fixing them. Other wise LOVE it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Again, please, allow people to make mistakes without a time penalty, and allow them to search for mistakes when they cannot solve puzzles. You take away the best part of the game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fun, but i don't like how it punishes you if you click in the wrong spot, the whole point of the puzzle is to experiment and stuff, plus correcting it makes it way too easy because you can just color :/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
its fun but only for the first group of puzzles because the next groups require hit and miss strategy. 3/5 because some puzzles are impossible to beat without guessing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Huge flaw in that you can just click all the squares and it fills it in for you, dont even have to do it correctly, thus creating no challenge, 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Buggiest Game Ever. Could not play with out the game continually pausing. Looks like a great game, if I could play it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't like the fact that your not allowed to make mistakes and it immediately gives you a penalty. Mistakes belong to this kind of game, as well as to find out, where the mistakes are that you made. This really lowers the joy of playing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The second thing that is annoying, is this checking routine, which automatically checs if the point is clicked correcly. It should be ran on demand, not automaticly. I missclicked many times and got time penalty.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
nice puzzle game with good music but it is ruined by the ridiculous speed at which you are expected to accomplish the tasks.
Please dont give this game any achievements. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
um... its really easy to cheat on... you don't need to change colors or make xes itl automaticly do what belongs in the cell
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
its a good game but nowhere near original... they took this idea straight from the armorgames game "Picross." So for that i give a 4....
because it brings back old times
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
get rid of the assist feature, or maybe allow users to turn it off, also, it would be nice to be able to see the whole puzzle on the grand master level
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice environment and music, cool concept. One thing I dislike though is that you can win simply by clicking all of the squares. Eventually you'll get it just because it automatically puts X's where it's a wrong tile. So it adds time to your counter, big deal, what difference does that make? Not like there's a competition for best time going on. What I'd like to see is more of a "free" hand, kinda like mine sweeper I guess, where you can either color or tag, and pick the color you want, so you could put down a wrong color in the wrong place and it won't tell you, you just won't win the puzzle. But over all, not bad. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My suggestion would be to remove marking the incorrect boxes - it would me much more fun and a bit more difficult. Now you can simply try things out and when you finish replay the board to max the score. Also there is huge probability of missclick, especially when you mark several boxes ahead.