Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for ClueSweeper

« Back to ClueSweeper

researchking

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I agree with the longer term need for replay value. Maybe something along the lines of rising rank in the the detective agency or police force? Maybe a longer story line not just focused on murders (e.g., theft, kidnapping) that has personal goal in mind, ala Monk. Cases should become more difficult either through larger boards, fewer clues, less time etc.

+ - !

(0)

JimKarnage

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I'd like this game a lot more if it actually required logic to select the tiles to click, rather than guessing most of the time. It would make more sense to me for the red herrings to be the 'mines', not something you find when clicking a square you know should be safe.

+ - !

(0)

DemigodX

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) It's a fun, unique game, but there needs to be some intent of replay. The money earned needs to stockpile for some type of achievement, in-game or on Kongregate (badges, of course).

+ - !

(0)

Jappert

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Very original and I'm loving it to be honest! :D

+ - !

(0)

VaperionXD

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Maybe add difficulty or something along those lines because i'm winning every time. 5/5 though I really like the idea.

+ - !

(0)

camillelambert

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) pretty good comment by Eclecto below.. exactly what I think.. but could not have expressed it like that!

+ - !

(0)

camillelambert

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) good concept.

+ - !

(0)

Eclecto

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Yeah, I think for this to be an effective game the time bonus needs to mean more. No matter how early you solve the crime, it's almost always worth more money if you continue to click away until you run out of time. I like the concept, though. It's very unique. Playing reverse minesweeper is also not the most exciting thing in the world. The best strategy is just to click around squares with large numbers. It's pretty rare that you can actually use deduction to guarantee the location of a clue, and you would think deduction should be important for a detective game.

+ - !

(0)

LobsterMobster

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Whenever I see "expert at lockpicking" I think it was Jill Valentine. :) I kind of wonder, how do they determine if someone is brutally violent? Have them commit a murder?

+ - !

(0)

Wismac

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) the highscores I get still aren't updating to the highscore board, what gives?

+ - !

(0)

Everet

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) enjoyable variation on two old standby's. As some have mentioned some variation might help for replay value. Perhaps incorporating varying difficulty (puzzle size perhaps)? My only real beef is that a quick solve isn't worth more cash. I got an early left handed clue with only one left handed suspect and it turned out to be worth the least money / score wise.

+ - !

(0)

mickle377

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) gets repitive and boring after a while 3/5

+ - !

(0)

BretonSG

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Cool concept, but a little lacking in playability. It's a 3/5 from me. Oh, and it says in the updates that "Suspects spaced out a bit more than before". For a moment there, I was wondering if they were daydreaming when I was solving the case...

+ - !

(0)

scrapcat

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) good game. Also had problem where mouse moved slightly and clicked a person I had already eliminated. Good to see original game.

+ - !

(0)

Thunderr

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) i won by random choice at the very beginning of the game :D lucky me

+ - !

(0)

joper34

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) erm cool but now its like:look murder click the tiles-found out the murderer.

+ - !

(0)

VijgenVeger

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) i clicked 5 out of 6 that they werent suspects.. pressed solve when my mouse slipped away. clicked the wrong person because of that.. I already ruled him out by clicking!

+ - !

(0)

legend3454

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) awesome game 5/5 and faved

+ - !

(0)

DaDDy_Devil

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Needs a mute button, the music is so annoying :S

+ - !

(-1)

rrauwl

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Great first effort. Needs to ramp up the difficulty slowly as the rounds continue, then you can attach a plot, etc. But great concept, looking forward to the sequel.

+ - !

(0)

Everyl

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) A very good concept, feels like it could stand to be fleshed out more to give it more replayability.

+ - !

(0)

Govetenko

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) favorited it, 4/5 really like the idea, needs more development, but i cant encourage this game more

+ - !

(0)

ViktorVaughn

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Needs a story line, more diverse gameplay, difficulty, etc. For now it's fine as a demo, but to be a full game it needs more. 3/5

+ - !

(0)

spacejanitor

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I'd like a button to mark a tile as one that definitely has no clue under it, like you can in Minesweeper. But it's interesting game.

+ - !

(0)

PatientDragoness

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Very limited playability. One round was all I needed. This isn't for serious puzzle or deduction aficionados. It's too easy. For those who find minesweeper frustrating, it will be too hard. This needs difficulties, levels, and a better story. I've seen action games more engaging than this in terms of story.

+ - !

(0)

KivaShirogane

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) This is a reaaaally good game. I just wish there was some way to mark squares you knew nothing was in.

+ - !

(0)

vampiredaze

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) This is great! A nice original idea 4/5

+ - !

(0)

Lesterek

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) its like Clue/ Cluedo and its great ;) btw if someone liked this you might wanna check http://www.hasbro.com//clue/content/virtual-mansion/index.html?GUID=173A84A1-6362-4FE1-921E-E3E255C15444&src=endeca

+ - !

(0)

ANDREIII500

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) LOL XD! The cousin: Right handed and a meticious planner. The colleage: Left handed and brutally violent. The suspect (not a character) is brutally violent and a meticious planner. so, i have got to choose randomly one of the cousin and colleage. i chose the colleage but it was the cousin xD

+ - !

(1)

milford

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) A reverse minesweeper. Well, this is a very interessing idea :) A well made game, but the storyline, a series of levels with growing difficulty would be nice here. 4/5

+ - !

(0)

ANDREIII500

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) really nice!

+ - !

(0)

valys

Mar. 12, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Good game, but it needs more.

+ - !

(0)

Foffersan

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) pretty good...looking forward for a sequel :)

+ - !

(0)

JDCAce

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Chain smokers ARE addicted to drugs.

+ - !

(0)

Seawied

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) great game! Although, there should be more encouragement to solve the puzzle early

+ - !

(0)

Arekutheartist

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Very addictive, but it's missing something that would make it a semi-classic. :)

+ - !

(0)

Jimbo08

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) story mode would be cool

+ - !

(0)

PoopLoops

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Very fun game.

+ - !

(0)

robinso

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I suggest making a storyline and making the puzzles bigger or more difficult as you progress through

+ - !

(0)

geekahedron

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Needs a mute button! Come on, people! Also, it would be nice to keep track of squares that don't have clues somehow...

+ - !

(0)

Bateau

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) Need ability to mark squares NOT to use (like the flags in miesweeper)

+ - !

(0)

abates98

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) average 287. :S

+ - !

(0)

Selva

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) It is possible to be rich and deep in debt. It is also possible to be poor and free of debt. I think I'd rather be the first...

+ - !

(0)

D34dpool

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I just finished a game where two people were both Very Rich, and Deep in Debt.

+ - !

(0)

CapTortuga

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) It is strange that when you actually do somenthing good, as getting a clue, it makes it harder to get the others and eventually you get to guess the tiles. Mineswiper was all the other way around, always getting new clues as the game goes further on. Other than that its a good game and a new aproach (very rare this days). 5/5

+ - !

(0)

weirdguy

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) I think adding gameplay or story would overpower the logic puzzle part.

+ - !

(0)

PineCube

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) The orphan is a right handed alcoholic that's deep in debt. That must be one swanky orphanage.

+ - !

(0)

YaGames

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) This was pretty nice. . . brilliant spin on two classics. 5/5 +fave; I like cdamm's idea.

+ - !

(0)

Mattgo90

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) nice game

+ - !

(0)

cdamm

Mar. 11, 2010

Under rating threshold (show) 4/5. nice twist on a classic.. needs depth. maybe a shop to use the money you earn? buy an extra clue, more time, etc...?

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate