Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Let's add debate to this game \o/. Although the reasoning for why simple representation appeals to more people is fair, it still reminds me that it's a fictional game. Whereas if I see rich detail, I can dedicate myself more to that "reality".
What's your opinion folks?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You should become teachers. I bet your lessons wouldn't be boring, at least if you're teaching informatics... You rock!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
you are coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This series of 4 episodes were super awsm !!!!
I would love to see more game design stuff explained and simplified in such a manner.
Good luck to u guys!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If everything in SCHOOL was taught this way, there would be less filthy-mouthed Call of Duty fanboys and more little Einsteins making the world a better place.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Thank you for making this final game of understanding games! Its a really fun and funny based series and i hope you make part 5! I cant want if you do!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For someone teaching flash games, you should learn to scale your games to an absolute value rather than pixel by pixel quantity. I thought that was the norm for flash games?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5767883/most-flash-games-dont-resize-properly-in-a-browser-window-how-can-i-easily-mak
The link cuts off but check that out. If that doesn't work, google it. It'll save me a lot of frustration and I'm sure many more.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I actually disagree; I find it easier to relate to a character if they look more realistic, even if they're an alien diplomat or a dinosaur pack leader.