Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Whoa, hold up, you are saying that "If the switch is pressed, then the switch will be pressed." is false? DOES NOT COMPUTE!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I cannot agree with "the machine can't release you" - because it said "The machine would release me if it cannot assess me" - so there is actually a possibility to release me. It says nowhere that it CAN successfully assess me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good concept, but terrible execution. Must be a problem with the coding or something. The fact that some choices are not available unless you scroll with the arrow keys is bad enough; the fact that when you do this, it CHANGES THE REST OF YOUR CHOICES almost makes this unplayable. It had potential, but it was not at all well done.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Use the down arrow key in the last one to find O as well as Australia is wrong to ban videogames. Btw, finishing level 10 made me feel really smart.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1: This game is called ir/rational redux. 2: Redux implies that this is a second version/remake/sequel. 3: If this is the redux, then where is the original?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also when you hit the down arrow in the game to go to the answers that aren't visible it changes multiple answers instead of just 1.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
-1 for not being resizable. Having to change my screen resolution to look at a window above 14% of my screen is annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Thank god for my insistence on learning the Greek and Russian alphabets a few years ago! Really helped in remembering what everything meant (e.g. "backwards R= ya").
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
//Current subject emotion: annoyance// Id use a term starting with "f" and ending with "off", but your close enough, XD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
for those having problems scrolling with those with more answers, as i have and as others have judging by the comments. The use the arrow keys once you've highlighted the answer :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@stinky472, there are no fallacies. The Jack and Jill problem does use contraposition, though, although the concept isn't explained in the game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just a quick question, is level 7 even solvable? I dont see "Australia is wrong to ban 18+ video games" as an option to choose from.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the logic is good in all the levels, but the way that the questions are formulated are impossible. Question 8, for example, pretty much gives the entire solution with one thing missing. It's extremely confusing to think that you must 'construct' an argument, but to have most of it given to you. Lots of more confusing levels 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay, this game is interesting. However, for the bloody life of me i could NOT TOTALLY NOT get the last puzzle. What the heck was "the question"? What am i supposed to solve?! What's the "therefore A" supposed to mean? Was i supposed to substitute in statements or something? Also, brain was exceptionally unhelpful.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
LOL, i havent finished the game yet, but i must say its hilarious xD
Something about pink elephants. And all the funny comments that so stand out.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Perhaps this whole logic thing is overrated. While it seems useful, it does nothing whatsoever for your mood."
This literally made me laugh out loud. So spot-on, and that's coming from someone who tries to apply logic to most situations.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I just checked your website. I had assumed that this game was created by someone who had been programming and had their mind turned into a strange source language, but it seems that the original was completely text-based, and now I don't know how it must have worked. Anyway, great game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@SteelHearted umm no. it litterally says "the argument is circular" therefore null, logic, in my opinion it was a little touch from the devs. saying there wasn't an all powerful god... honestly any logical thinking takes you to same outcome
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
bonus points for a game that requires some thinking. I enjoyed the last door with the maths to learn what some of those symbols mean. good work!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yay death. I was confused on a couple. I liked how on the God one, the logical answer was the is a perfect God. I am Christian and I appreciate that. Thanks! Great game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1.IF AND ONLY IF this is a very good game THEN this gets a 5-star rating.
2.This is a very good game.
3.THEREFORE it gets a 5-star rating.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Funinyourgame the entire thing is how you rationally relate the two objects, they don't have to be related you just have to make it make sense. example: two statement completely unrelated= If, and only if, the ball is blue, it is a fun toy. If the ball is a fun toy, then I can eat a taco. The ball is blue, therefore Im going to eat a taco.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The only real criticism I have is that a few of the panels flashed by too quickly to read, and the only way to attempt to re-read them was to re-load the level at which the panel briefly shows. Other than that, excellent game; 5 Stars.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Honest to crap I thought the last room was going to be a Turing machine and that the game was going to continue like that. YOU WICKED GENIUS. (also, hello sequel)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game, the rational idea is great, but can someone explain the logic behind the 9th level?
Here is how I see it:
The machine thinks the thing is a relvant clue.
The machine thanks the is a blue ball.
HOW IS THAT A CONTRADICTION?!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay, seriously, for Australia and the final level, I was stuck for a long time simply because I didn't realize I could scroll down. You really need to fix that bug.