Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There's a worthwhile idea here, but it's buggy as hell (drop down box especially), and there are faults in the logic. Both fixable problems that could leave you with a good game for the sequel.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also sometimes when I use the arrow keys to see a hidden option, the options I chose previously get changed. Quite frustrating.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1.IF a game is mind blowing it is good
2. IF this game is mind blowing, THEN it is good.
3. This game is mind blowing
4.THEREFORE this game is good
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I feel like the last level is broken... In the last slot I cam only put A, -A, E and -E. There is nothing O - related
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The symbols make no sense. Except they also do. It's exactly like a geometric proof, except when I follow those rules, it says the answer is false. The symbols for IF, AND, THEN, NOT, and THEREFORE are even similar to how they are in math. There is also only one answer in each blank that can be put in, because they were the only ones stated before or it hasn't already been proven. You can't add symbols that haven't been given yet, and proving something you've already proven gets you nowhere. The answers I put in are the only ones that can be logically put there, and they're wrong. Yet it's a question of logic. If "my logic" doesn't fit logic, then I am illogical. And if I am an illogical thinker, then I cannot complete a game of one concrete logical path. Darn.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Whoa, hold up, you are saying that "If the switch is pressed, then the switch will be pressed." is false? DOES NOT COMPUTE!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I cannot agree with "the machine can't release you" - because it said "The machine would release me if it cannot assess me" - so there is actually a possibility to release me. It says nowhere that it CAN successfully assess me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good concept, but terrible execution. Must be a problem with the coding or something. The fact that some choices are not available unless you scroll with the arrow keys is bad enough; the fact that when you do this, it CHANGES THE REST OF YOUR CHOICES almost makes this unplayable. It had potential, but it was not at all well done.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Use the down arrow key in the last one to find O as well as Australia is wrong to ban videogames. Btw, finishing level 10 made me feel really smart.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1: This game is called ir/rational redux. 2: Redux implies that this is a second version/remake/sequel. 3: If this is the redux, then where is the original?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also when you hit the down arrow in the game to go to the answers that aren't visible it changes multiple answers instead of just 1.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
-1 for not being resizable. Having to change my screen resolution to look at a window above 14% of my screen is annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Thank god for my insistence on learning the Greek and Russian alphabets a few years ago! Really helped in remembering what everything meant (e.g. "backwards R= ya").
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
//Current subject emotion: annoyance// Id use a term starting with "f" and ending with "off", but your close enough, XD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
for those having problems scrolling with those with more answers, as i have and as others have judging by the comments. The use the arrow keys once you've highlighted the answer :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@stinky472, there are no fallacies. The Jack and Jill problem does use contraposition, though, although the concept isn't explained in the game.