Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The correct logical phrase for a symmetric relationship is "if and only if". the phrase was used once or twice but some other inferences had to be made. just something to think about if you make another game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well done, sir! That one was a lot of fun figuring it out :3 The logic centers of my puzzle-solving cortex don't get as good a workout as this was NEARLY enough.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love the game, but you lost me on the Michael Atkinson screen. Firstly, I'm American, so I didn't even know who he is until now. Secondly, the whole syllogism is just really badly phrased and unclear.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Both argument 7/10 and the final argument (on the door) are missing the correct answers in their final boxes (having double checked online on the walkthrough). Otherwise its a good/interesting game :) different and i like it. But please fix those problems =\ it massively detracts from the game to have it broken...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
at puzzle 4 try to change the "or" to "else". In an "If" statement the 1st condition if its followed by "or" it means that 1 of 2 conditions make the statement correct. That "or" really confused me i think its better with an "else". but that's just me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
test 7 is broken, the last line is missing the correct answer, I even went so far as to look up a walkthrough after trying everything and the answer it listed doesnt exist in the box
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Tests 7 and 10 are broken for me. Both of them are missing the correct argument in the last box. Would have been a good game, except for this. 2/5 until fixed.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is great! It made me feel proud of myself because I realized I am still able to solve problems and think even though it's summertime. 5/5 game great job
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If a perfect God exists and he would not allow the belief in him to be in error then not many but ALL people would belief in this God. If many belief it means some people don't. Which will make the God many people believe in a less than perfect God.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I went to play Everybody Edits after this, and I picked a level named "Art code is 1616". I went in, and the level wasn't trolled. I thought, 1. If the code is real, the level will be trolled. 2. The level is not trolled. 3. Therefore, the code is not real. (btw, the code WASN'T real. :D)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The message scrawled in red on the wall is not possible to logically complete - the assumptions are flawed to the point of being non sequitur, nothing can make that correct.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it's sometimes hard to understand what you really mean in some sentences. example: level four: I thought you meant if(a) then( b or c) but it turned out to be if(a) then (b) else(c). I think no human language can be flawlessly used for this kind of abstract logical reasoning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Very nice, gave me a good impression of how mice would feel if both them and the scientists were on some higher level of rational thinking :-)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game was epic, totally love it. A bit ambiquos from phrasing part, but oh well. Language is language, you cannot change it. Also, THE ending. Got surprised by a door, guess not having logic classes made me stumble for a while. IF the next game is harder AND longer OR have a way to set up our puzzles THEN it will be total win worth paying for. Now shut up and take dat penny!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not sure i get all of this... Some very true statements are declared to be false, despite the fact that they can be used as valid arguements.
This alone makes the game bad. Interesting but quite personal to the creators ideas. And since you can only progress if you pick the "correct" answer, then a game like this loses all it's meaning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Desilude IF I am alive, THEN (I am breathing oxygen OR the laws of biology have been broken). In other words, you're either alive because you're breathing oxygen OR the laws of the biology have been suspended. The next part tells us that these laws have not been suspended and that we're breathing oxygen, so we know that we must therefore be alive... but we also know that the first answer must be that we're breathing oxygen and not that the laws of biology apply, because of the OR (the solution would be ambiguous otherwise if either one could be true). Where the game gets really confusing IMO is because some of the propositions are so axiomatic, like that if the laws of biology apply, we're breathing oxygen... that is an axiom -- a self-evident truth we usually do not have to state.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great!! level 4 might stump less people if the OR in Line 1 was moved to the left. level 10 stumped me for a bit, the notation was hard to examine
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
OMG level 8 is bugged, i put in "there is a high chance for me to get caught" on the first one (obvious) but on the second one i put in the machine will NOT kill me when it catches me and on line 8 i put "i should try to escape" BUT IT DOESNT WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
P.S. this game needs a discussion board! It's rather awkward to discuss some of the challenges in a comment format without line breaks!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If anything the game sort of made me appreciate the ambiguities of human language since the game likewise makes several inferences that would not hold up in strict propositional logic, like the fact that IF/THEN does not necessarily establish symmetric relations, even though some parts of the game require you to make those fallacies just to get the correct answer.