Comments for ir/rational Redux

« Back to ir/rational Redux

avatar for Coin_Star2
Coin_Star2

Jun. 22, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) IF AND ONLY IF Jack OR Jill is ill, THEN there is a possibility that the other is not ill. Jack is ill. THEREFORE Jill might not ill. The game stated that Jill was not ill. THEREFORE Jill should be able to fetch the water on her own. This was not an option in the game. Logical errors make me wonder about their reasoning. _____________________ THEREFORE I am wondering why Jill can't fetch the water by herself. Do you know what goes in the blank? ;)

+ - !

(0)

avatar for kiryopa
kiryopa

Jun. 15, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) BEST

+ - !

(0)

avatar for Destrroyerboy
Destrroyerboy

Jun. 14, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) @silversleek: That is incorrect. That is called denying the antecedent, which is a formal fallacy. It follows the form:If p then q. Not p, therefor not q. You can, however, deny the consequence, saying that: If p, then q. Not q, therefor not p. At the end of your comment, your form was: P. If not p, then not q. Therefor q. However, the only way to change your statement legally is to change it to: P. If q, then p. Therefor q. However, to get that statement to comply with the data, obviously a fallacy is necessary. So you're wrong.

+ - !

(1)

avatar for DoitsuSama
DoitsuSama

Jun. 7, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) This logic kills me Therefore , I'm dead . No jackass , you're just using metaphors !

+ - !

(0)

avatar for viciusdemon
viciusdemon

May. 29, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) wow

+ - !

(3)

avatar for graven2722
graven2722

May. 8, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) If this game is one of the best then I will Rate 5 and Favourite I have Rated 5 and Favourited Therefore :

+ - !

(3)

avatar for DrDragontamer
DrDragontamer

May. 7, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) ...So I am dead? That seems kinda sucky. You just analyzed my logic and intellect long enough to kill me off? That machine sucks.

+ - !

(3)

avatar for silversleek
silversleek

Apr. 28, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) i already have a problem with the first option. The correct answer is that if i want the light to come on i should press the switch, because the light is connected to the switch. (nevermind how i can see that in the dark) BUT, the answer "if i don't want the lights to come on, i shouldn't press the switch" should also be applicable, even though it's not. (I tried all the answers out of curiosity, even the pink elephant.) I want them to turn on, not doing this will leave them off, ergo i should do it instead. I get that it's not "as good of" an answer as the first one, but it still works.

+ - !

(0)

avatar for deadslug
deadslug

Apr. 28, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Ugh.. definitely harder than i originally thought

+ - !

(3)

avatar for KingTinker4Life
KingTinker4Life

Apr. 26, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) That creepy laughing in the backround needs to stop.

+ - !

(2)

avatar for CoolGamer3
CoolGamer3

Apr. 15, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) WTF my last comment laged

+ - !

(-2)

avatar for CoolGamer3
CoolGamer3

Apr. 15, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) 1. IF AND ONLY IF you like my comment THEN you should click + 2. Choose: you like my comment you don't like my comment 3. THEREFORE Choose: you should click + you shouldn't click +

+ - !

(5)

avatar for truebluehero
truebluehero

Mar. 28, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) I was having fun with this game... Until level 7, when I had to see the comments to see there were more choices. It's not that hard to at least let you know those options are there. Then I started using arrow keys and it would alter three choices at once, literally making it impossible to complete. Great game, but still needs work.

+ - !

(5)

avatar for gofio
gofio

Mar. 17, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Fix the scrolling already. I was stuck on two puzzles because it wouldn't show me the last two possible answers.

+ - !

(2)

avatar for FididlyDo12
FididlyDo12

Mar. 14, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) extra puzzle if you donate 'any amount'? but 0 is an amount, so how do I get to it? nice game :P

+ - !

(7)

avatar for chaindeath
chaindeath

Mar. 12, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) what is a game by professionals doing on kongregate?

+ - !

(2)

avatar for to4ooo4
to4ooo4

Mar. 7, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) I wish the statements you chose would stay when you asked the brain...

+ - !

(4)

avatar for aylatrigger
aylatrigger

Mar. 1, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Logic puzzles! I remember when I took my first Philosophy of Math class my favorite from our book was, "Batman is the President of the United States of America or Batman is not the President of the United States of America." (which was prefaced by 'This statement is always true').

+ - !

(1)

avatar for aylatrigger
aylatrigger

Mar. 1, 2015

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(0)

avatar for aylatrigger
aylatrigger

Mar. 1, 2015

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(0)

avatar for aylatrigger
aylatrigger

Mar. 1, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) ). Loved the game. ...Make more?

+ - !

(0)

avatar for aylatrigger
aylatrigger

Mar. 1, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) ). Loved the game. ...Make more?

+ - !

(0)

avatar for spartagamer
spartagamer

Feb. 26, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) But marmite DOES taste good with cheese :(

+ - !

(0)

avatar for crashboom10
crashboom10

Feb. 4, 2015

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-7)

avatar for peterssimon65
peterssimon65

Jan. 29, 2015

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-14)

avatar for RyoStonewell
RyoStonewell

Jan. 28, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) gawd, my head hurts! XD

+ - !

(0)

avatar for AtomicAura
AtomicAura

Jan. 19, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) Because pink elephants like dark rooms, obviously.

+ - !

(9)

avatar for nowinlushcolor
nowinlushcolor

Jan. 15, 2015

Under rating threshold (show) I've noticed that even if the multiple choices are correct, they do not apply if they are entered in the wrong spots. I mean this as in the solution to the Jack and Jill problem, I entered the correct options in one position, failed, tried again with the same options and succeeded.

+ - !

(3)

avatar for Inflatable_You
Inflatable_You

Dec. 20, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I didn't even realise that you could scroll down to other options because I was using mouse only. Very frustrating as i wouldn't have needed to google a walkthrough if I had.

+ - !

(5)

avatar for TrinaC6
TrinaC6

Dec. 1, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) nbnbnbnbbnbnnbnbnbb

+ - !

(0)

avatar for shazeelawan
shazeelawan

Nov. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Nice game, but the ending is unfair.

+ - !

(1)

avatar for ViniUG
ViniUG

Nov. 18, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I'm apparently not a human being....

+ - !

(2)

avatar for TheSlendermane
TheSlendermane

Nov. 2, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Very disappointing. Has a lot of potential, but the ending is just unfair.

+ - !

(4)

avatar for andyman119
andyman119

Oct. 28, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) oh yeah, what a sick game, though there were a couple interface issues that frustrated me, like the inability to access lower options with mouse only, but the propositional calculus was great, and I love the game, and the ending was fantastic

+ - !

(0)

avatar for andyman119
andyman119

Oct. 27, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) regardless of how long I'm trapped in the room, I still can't learn chinese (everyone who gets that reference deserves a cookie)

+ - !

(1)

avatar for Elisabetta5368
Elisabetta5368

Oct. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) One of the few things I actually (semi-) understood from Geometry last year was the different types of reasoning. THIS IS MY GAME. ... Yet, I'm stumped. Regardless of that, I love the whole idea and twist on the stereotypical escape game. This one makes me think, which is my favorite part. And The Machine.

+ - !

(2)

avatar for desciclope666
desciclope666

Sep. 26, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) where the f*ck did i find those explosives!?

+ - !

(0)

avatar for spivee
spivee

Sep. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) 5/5 for the menu/exit choice

+ - !

(-1)

avatar for spivee
spivee

Sep. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I like how your last logical step is actually a specific instruction UeberBob

+ - !

(0)

avatar for superstrijder15
superstrijder15

Sep. 19, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) is there a sequel? and if there is, can somebody give me a link

+ - !

(2)

avatar for mortimerrush
mortimerrush

Sep. 18, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) I don't like the ending so much. please make a sequel so I can feel better.

+ - !

(1)

avatar for endofline
endofline

Sep. 15, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) how do you get a marker to write on the walls with?

+ - !

(1)

avatar for UeberBob
UeberBob

Sep. 1, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) ZerVexon - You failed to make a proper connection between whether there SHOULD and whether there WILL be a sequel, and there are a few other problems in your logic as well. IF the fans want a sequel, AND the game creator serves the fans' desires, THEN there will be a sequel. IF there will be a sequel, THEN the main character can NOT be dead. The fans want a sequel. ASSUMPTION: The game creator serves the fans' desires. THEREFORE, there will be a sequel. THEREFORE, the main character can NOT be dead. IF the assumption is correct, THEN please fix the drop down issue in the sequel. It took a lot of pleasure out of the otherwise most appreciable points in the game.

+ - !

(9)

avatar for UeberBob
UeberBob

Sep. 1, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) It's vaguely frustrating that the drop downs have answers that don't fit and no scroll bar, and when you try to scroll one to find the correct answer it scrolls the rest of them too.

+ - !

(7)

avatar for madmatt00
madmatt00

Aug. 29, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Where's the sequel?

+ - !

(3)

avatar for TheMinecraft13
TheMinecraft13

Aug. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Why did i not expect that...

+ - !

(0)

avatar for moneyelf
moneyelf

Aug. 25, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) for dummies who don't understand level 10:It's pure logic,translated to english it would look like: 1.G is true 2.if M is true,G is true,so A is true 3.M is true 4.(guess,I gave a huge hint) 5.if M and A are true,E is false 6.therefore E is false(not E) 7.if O and V are true,E is false or R is true and vice versa 8.(O is true)

+ - !

(3)

avatar for rinkaiho
rinkaiho

Aug. 14, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) Level 9 seems flawed

+ - !

(2)

avatar for ZerVexon
ZerVexon

Aug. 13, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) If the fans want a sequel, there should be a sequel. If there will be a sequel, the main character can NOT be dead. If the fans want a sequel and there should be a sequel, the main character has NOT died. Therefore, the Main character is not dead. Therefore there will be a sequel. (HINT HINT)

+ - !

(3)

avatar for canadura
canadura

Jul. 31, 2014

Under rating threshold (show) But... Pink elephants DO like darkly lit rooms >.<

+ - !

(6)

  • add a comment