Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great strategy game. Doesn't come off as demanding; e.g. 10% off items! Shop now!. The simplicity and engagement makes this game really addicting for me. I also love the fact that it's multiplayer - because you can't go wrong if a game is multiplayer!
What's more is that because strategy is pretty much the name of the game, the way the game approaches it is outstanding. There's loads of decks to try, combinations of cards use, rather it be one element or more. It's great.
Well done, zanzarino, you get a cookie.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@abcd2734 Why do you even bother to comment? Frankly, we'd all be better off without your replies. Including yourself.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I was not trying to say it was bad. I do like this game and want to get better, but I had not idea that it will not say which abilities are one-off unless you go to the wiki.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One of the best CCG's I have ever played in my entire life with the simple battle style but the strategy. I recommend this game to who ever likes strategy. Id rate this a 4.9 out of 5.0 the only con is that there is a limited card selection and all of the other parts of the game are awesome and it makes that tiny con even tinnier, to the point where it's not barely even a con.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Zavvnao read the wiki if you want to know more about cards. http://elementscommunity.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=fire&fulltext=Search
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The abilities are misleading.
Example: The Deja Vu card says you can copy it, and makes it look like you can do it multiple times. But you can only do it once, not even the copies can use the same ability.
And any card with a cost ability can only be done once per turn in the first place.
There needs to be something to let others know this, as I feel cheated.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ah, thanks oracle, 3 1hp decks in a row and I got the last shard of serendipity I needed for my master plan....The most utterly random rainbow deck in existence! 6 pandemoniums (unupped) 6 shards, 6 upped fate eggs, 1 discord, 1 enchant artifact, 4 hourglasses, 6 rewinds, and the rest quanta towers, mwahaaaha! (may or may not add a quintessence later depending on how often I wind up killing my own useful creatures) considered doing readiness/skeletons/eternities/animate weapon earlier, but it turned out to require too much luck on the actual cards drawn in the correct order.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
if you have a sanctuary, your quanta pool can't be altered during the opponent's turn. this includes adding quanta, like solar shield does.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
just one little problem here : the Solar Shield doesn't work - physical damage absorbed is NOT converted to quanta, thankfully it does shield 1 point, but still, the added value in quanta is very important
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@rpgplayer0491: 500 score doesn't take long at all. Ask for help in chat and you can easily be done in under an hour. Pvp is a little trickier, yes. But there is almost always someone willing to jump in.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
And that's not mentioning the 10 pvp wins. It's impossible to even get into pvp. There are no opponents (the game won't go past the negotiating point).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@skrawman: pay to win? What? There is no need to pay, and the only way to do that is donations anyways, which only get you rares which don't instantly make a good deck. You can more then easily make a competent deck without playing a single game. Next time, try actually playing the game before spouting nonsense.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@SkrawMan You don't have to pay anything to have fun with this game. With a few games, you already have enough to build a basic deck for farming lvl2. It takes time to get enough to upgrade all your cards, but that's a good thing, as it allows you to experiment with different playstyles.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Daexion. Like I mentioned earlier Omega did not do an personal attack. He responded to the way the statement was said only! And we'd be happy to hear you opinion just in a more adequate way :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
omegareaper, again with the personal attacks. I'm not here to argue about my opinion, and I never intended to do so in the first place. The simple fact you engaged in and continued to engage in personal attacks just made it less likely I ever will. Congrats on figuring out how to not get someone to answer your questions, I guess.