Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Everyone defending the Dime Shield. Yes, the dime shield does have counters. But when MULTIPLE whole genres of otherwise viable decks like shrieker rushes, mono time e.t.c. become suddenly useless because of ONE card it really isn't a positive addition to the game, as it reduces variety. Thing is, it's only really obnoxious and abusive when you chain them right after another, so (imo) the fix to them should be simply not being able to play them while you already have an active shield out: This way, there will be a 1-turn gap in any shield chains which makes them significantly less of an abuse case and maybe it will make people consider using the card in another way than chaining six of them back to back for 18 turns of immunity.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@abcd2734: There are other cards that counter shields then just the 5 pc cards. There are spells, poison, momentum, out right denial as well. Dime shield massively limits what people can make though. Mono life becomes bad because it can't do anything about it, mono time and light as well have little to no chance. Mono entropy has almost non, unless it is built to destroy it, mono fire still has less favor in the match up, even with deflags and fire bolts. Its a card that simply restricts deck building a lot because if you don't account for it at all, you lose to it every time. But if you do account for it, you make your deck worse against everything else that you don't need pc or the other counters for(except poison, universal damage and all).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
now what if you have a deck just to counter Dime Shields. What do you do against other decks like Bonewall decks. The problem with this game is you only have a single deck and all the games are Bo1. Literally worst card game in the world.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@zman14888: Just because it can be countered doesn't mean its not overpowered. Yes, people should adapt to it since it is unlikely to be nerfed any time soon(sadly), I will agree with that. However, it would also be nice to have more then 10 or 15 decks be viable just because dime shield stopped 90 others. Most rushes can't hope to win against it, deflag and steal also are far from win cons against it, though they do help. Bringing counters doesn't mean you win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To those complaining that dime shield needs a nerf. It can be countered. If you cannot counter it, build a better deck that can. If you don't want to, continue to lose. Adapt or die. Welcome to the real world people.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To add on to what Omega says. Dim shield is op even though it can be countered. Dim shield is one of the cards which affects the meta the most and forces people to bring counters against that particular cards that they wouldn't have played with otherwise. So yes Dim shield needs a nerf.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
how do I stop having the message that say the servers reached max connections try again. I have been having it for the last few weeks and really want to play
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@grolox: If you carry none of the above, you can easily wait 18 turns, not so much 9. And without major stall power, which mostly only stall decks have, you aren't surviving 18 turns against them. And no, you won't be able to rush them well, most rushes aren't killing in 3 turns unupped, which is as long as it might take to get the quanta, 2 upped.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@abcd: Counter dim shield the same way you counter most other shields. Use momentum, steal, deflag, SoF, or spell damage. If none of these are viable for your deck, wait out the 3 turns. This can be quite annoying as Aether decks do tend to run many dim shields, which can spiral into 9 turns were you do no damage. But if you're playing a deck that is unable to use any of previously named strats, rush a kill before the shields become a problem, or wait out the shields and win when they're gone, then that means dim shield heavy decks are simply a counter to you. Every deck has some counters, so if this is the case you could either switch your deck up, or simply accept that when you see your opponent is running lots of dim shields you're going to lose. And there's nothing wrong with that, as there isn't a deck you can make that has literally 0 counters.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Counter immortal creatures with shields. All shield effects still hit them, so pretty much every element has an option.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@abcd2734: Every game ever has match ups, that doesn't make something unbalanced. Most decks are closer to 50/50 depending on draws, aside from like 5 or 6 deck types, which aren't even super common for the most part, and are beaten by like 5 or 6 other ones anyways. Again, everything has match ups, that isn't unique to this.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@abcd the way balance in this game works is its like a rock, paper scissors thing, with winrates. Suppose Rock beats scissors 100% of the time, Scissors Beats paper 80% of the time and Paper only beats Rock 60% of the time. It would still be balanced since you would just use paper less often, but it would still have that niche use if your opponent is using rock every single time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is probably one of the least balanced card games out. Everyone that thinks its balanced is dumb since most of the deck matchups are 7-3 at best.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have collected 468 cards! I sometimes imagine if I had them in real-life. I've played a lot of magic the gathering when I was smaller as well, so there's that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I most certainly did cash in my electrum last time, it must be the rank #1 effect taking place. At 44 wins and 2 losses now, the deck has generated 1179 electrum! I'm swimming in money now.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dragoncrusader, if your deck reaches top 10, it generates way more electrum (it gives you more electrum if it wins, and generates more electrum for the opponent if it loses) this is further enhanced when it reaches rank 3, 2, and 1. Also, you might've forgotten to click 'Cash the electrum!' last time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My gold league deck has 37 wins 2 losses, yet has generated 783 electrum? How on earth does that work? Even if EVERYBODY gave me a thumbs up and I got 18 electrum per win I would only have 666 electrum.. so confused rn
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@bblackgary Yes. Some of the card art is from Spore. If you click Fotosynthesis's name on the top left of the main page it will direct you to their profile.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Spore™ is a game where you can create creatures like some of the artworks there(e.g. maxwell's demon,Ash eater,etc.) they made those by taking the 3D mesh and putting it with a background.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
After getting to level 100 , one should be able to fight the oracle once everyday , where he uses the 'card of the day' as the focus
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
yes its such a shame that the efforts of whoever made the beautiful card artwork is wasted because zanz is being so lazy rofl
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@DragonCrusader, thats a horrible strategy. You would probably pay more to get in arena then you would actually make if you only fight 1 HP decks.
It would be better to just go in gold or platinum arena instead, getting an EM there gives you more money. The chances are small to get any 1 HP deck, and I would not reccomend this strategy to anyone. I am curious how much money you supposedly made using this strategy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wow i found best strategy for fast money is actually just grinding bronze decks with photons and dragonflies and instaquitting anything that is not 1HP
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'll be frank. This game is just amazing. It has depth and character. It doesn't try to money-grab like the other "multiplayer" games on Kong.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@DragonC: When the deck you submitted to the arena beats an opponent, that opponent gets a chance to vote your deck up or down. You get less points when they vote you down, so your deck probably has more down votes than his. Also, you have not 'clearly outperformed him'. You have less loses, but he has more wins. For it to be a 'clear outperformance' you need more wins than him *and* less loses. Ex: winning 4 and losing 1 is not a 'clear outperformance' compared to winning 30 and losing 10. Having a better win percentage does not mean you have a better deck when he has more plays than you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
http://www.elementsthegame.com/arena.php?rank=-1&league=3
why am I (DD99) only rank 2, I have 30 wins 1 loss, rank 1 has 38 wins 3 loss. We are same age. My deck has clearly outperformed his on the winrate, so what is going on/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My deck is 4 days old and it only has 13 plays =.= meanwhile other people in the same league have 21 plays on their 4 day old deck... this is unfair, i cant get a top rank in my league because of crap luck..