Under rating threshold (hideshow)
3. These things aside, it was an interesting way, though I would have liked it, if it was possible to draw more than one deduction out of one single evidence. And exspecially: to re-read dialogues that did lead into an evidence like the dialogues telling about the different past heists. I Actually replayed the game before making my final deduction to be able to re-read the book's heist. And also: there is one bug in one of the deduction texts. The two interpretation introduction texts in the bottom-right are the same.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
2. Or morely in self-preservation to hinder the police and allow further heists. This leaves one last deduction to be tested: Pure idealism. The greed's raid was to counter his greedyness, which fits perfectly and also did reach its goal. Stealing the illegal books could be to save things that shouldn't be touched or thought about or to lessen the stress of the book's owner. it also fits. But how in the heaven is stealing files from a police station idealistic??? In the end, it is obvious, that it has to fit anyhow. But I can not see the referance; can anyone explain this? Deducing the only thing left, I made the half-idealistic decision. In fact I did invest a long time instead of jumping through and see the end instead of thinking myself. And then there is one more thing that I answered wrong: The museum's lights switched off. If she was inside the statua, how did she switched lights from the inside?
Thank you for long and detailed review in more comments, I'll answer to this one as this is the one that has the most questions. So, yeah, stealing files from the police is not idealistic, but it's a statement, as shown in the message she sent to the police: it's a challenge, she's telling them they can't touch her, no matter how hard they try.
But you're right on the light part: it's not very hard to do turn the lights off from a distance, with the right equipment, but I see how that could seem counter-intuitive. I've been trying to make the right deductions less obvious, but they shouldn't be that confusing. I'll try to do better next time. Thanks again! :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
WARNING, SPOILER! -Okay, I finished the Game for the first time now, but got two wrong results. First one is the deduction of the motive. It was pretty easy to exclude money since the only crime that was worth something was the villa raid and even this one had high idealistic links. But then there are two deductions left: Idealistic and half idealistic. The half one fits if you give the thesis 'steal something the target does not really need, even if they think they do'. By that, there is the man with too much money, who is even suffering from it. Then the police that aren't able to find anything anyways with just some rather worthless files left. And the last one where illegal books were stolen, of whose content the owner already knew and therefore not needed. The valuable part of the greed's robbery is obvious and the illegal books should be also worth something. Stealing the files also makes sense for self-profit.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
just awesome, i cant sleep well if i see another game and dont play it. now this time i didnt manage to solve the final part correctly, but that just makes me happier looooolzz
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In the end, no matter how I fidgetted with the deaductions, I was only able to get the right conclusion (which I never tought of before). Also, only three of the deaductions were linked to the conclusion, even if in the end I got 100%.
That's true, and that's because those deductions are there to lead you to the wrong solutions! There are two, by the way, even if you could only find the right one ;)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love this series and I'm really excited to play this game. Sadly, my cursor is lagging really bad when I hover over the game making it pretty much unplayable. The game itself doesn't seem to lag at all, just the cursor.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game, spellcheck needed on reknown/renowkn though... Renowned would be correct in both cases.
Tx for the fun series!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is the first time the ending dissapoints me. Maybe I'm petty because this is the first time I lose, but [SPOILER] this just doesn't seem like the Cat's style.
Stealing the heart of someone who doesn't need it anymore is just like her, though. If you think that she *killed* Kashl, don't worry: he's a zombie, he can "live" without a heart just fine! :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm not putting 'Spoiler' warnings. If people choose to read the comments before finishing the game, it's their own fault if they see one which spoils something.
It's just a form of courtesy. Even if you're right and that'd be their fault, there's no harm in being nice to other users and avoid all spoilers when possible ;)
Well, that's true (though maybe you should have started your comment with a SPOILER warning :D) but you get a little satisfaction if you're able to solve the thief's riddle, right? Besides, you'll have other chances in the future to capture the thief, for sure :D
Thanks!! It is indeed somewhat regular... I'm trying to release one episode per month!
I'll probably stop around October (so I can work on the desktop game for Steam) but I'll be back as soon as after the launch with some new free cases :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For those of you stuck, just use the dates of previous robberies(in suitcase) on the bookcase in the office. Rate + so other people can see!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When you click on the magnifying glass at Slobber's Studio, why is the red pulsating circle emanating from Slobber's breasts?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
27/27! The nine deaths cat is no match for me! I wonder how you'll do it next time though, since we now know how our new nemesis/anti-hero looks like? Certainly since the brain police now knows how the thief looks too
Good question! But you see, Zombie Society is very big... and it's a total mess. It's not hard for someone as the Cat to lay in wait for ten-twenty years, create a new identity and start over as nothing happened. She'll be fine :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Kinda sucks that if you only use the autosave you gotta play through the entire game again if you made a wrong deduction.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I loved the last ones but it was a bit annoying to have to go round again to get the badge - any chance that this will acknowledge me once it gets its (well deserved) badge? Since I'm not prepared to wait...
Thank you. And yeah, there are two things I fixed to prevent that problem:
1- If you have finished the game, I've added a code that should let you get the badge as soon as you reach the main menu; 2 - If that doesn't work for any reason, when you load the game this time you'll be able to play from the very end, so you just need to skip through the ending once again and you'll get the badge anyway
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
hey Lu, I think there's a glitch where the one of the deductions page has the same description, it the one where the detective explains if it true that Kashl has a soft side.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's honestly so cool that you continue to make free content for us even though you're going to make a paid version :) So many good games just stop half-way to get us to buy the paid version, but a lot of people can't afford to spend money on games (if we could, we wouldn't be on kongregate) so it's really awesome that you're doing this for us :)
In the end, I decided to promote the "big" game with this free episodes because it was the best option both for me and the players. I'm very glad you agree! And don't worry, more episodes are on their way :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How to get a perfect score ?
1. you can mess with deduction except the first one
2. save before you end it
3. watch the ending
4. load the save files
5. you already know the answer,so answer it correctly this time
6. Enjoy it