Recent posts by PatriotSaint on Kongregate

Topic: Serious Discussion / The ideal military government?

Are workmen in constant danger of being caught in a 4-hour firefight or being blown up on the street by an IED?

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by PatriotSaint:

Well, some of the liberals are gun owners themselves.

Basically, only the self-and-buddy-proclaimed intellectual elite should be able to have guns. Oh, and politicians and their armed bodyguards. Oh, and movie stars and their armed bodyguards.

And some angry guys fighting other angry guys in Syria and such. In fact, why just give these random people military grade fully-automatic weaponry if we can send them high-explosives and anti-armor weapons, too. At least they’re just piece-o-crap RPG-7s.

Yup, those guys can handle it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4vOr4mBuZw

But not those dirty hicks from the South and West (a.k.a the Wild West, where Americans buy guns to kill and loot people… wait, ain’t that Chicago?) and TexRussia. (?)

Wait… ;)

https://www.youtube.com/user/FPSRussia?feature=watch

One of these links leads to who the government is sending weapons to. Some random civilians turned rebels in Syria.

The other is someone who has hundreds of guns and has not killed anybody. (!!!!!!!???)

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Thank you for that, Pulsaris….nicely stated.
As I said before about his comparison….WHAT?
Why, on the issue of gun control in America would he be wanting to compare apples to…well, to coconuts?
LOL

More people are killed by coconuts than assault rifles. Shouldn’t there be an anti-coconut lobby?

Assault coconuts are dangerous. Nobody should be allowed to have them.

Oh, also, unsurprisingly, more people in the US are killed by KNIVES than assault rifles.

Oh, and one of you will point out that we aren’t just talking about so-called “assault rifles” (a.k.a. semi-automatic rifles. You guys could ave gotten away with saying “battle rifle” or something like that), but handguns.

Handguns kill more people in a year than rifles. So why are they trying to ban rifles?

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

I just want to say one last thing before I go. (Trolling has gone on long enough.)

You don’t have a leg to stand on.
All your beliefs are flawed, and wrong.
Keep living in ignorant stupidity. You will never learn the error of your way, and will cause more harm than good if you continue to support flawed ideologies, which do nothing but harm society in the long run.
People like you should be locked up for the sake of public safety—end hyperbole.

Bye, my friend :)

So, this is your defense.

“You are wheelchair-bound
You are wrong.
You are ignorant and stupid. You will always be stupid. Everyone thinks you are stupid, including me.
You should be stripped of your rights and locked in a prison because you don’t agree with me.

Bye, and I hate you. RAWR. Maybe someday I will think of a real defense and think, ’I’m terrible at comebacks.’"

-Draco

Topic: Off-topic / lol all the miss korea pageant contestants look the exact same

Originally posted by TheInternetRules:

I remember when racism was funny.

Also A4 is clearly the best.

Eh, how is this racist?

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

You make me laugh, PatriotSaint.
Thanks, I needed that.

I’ll come back when you are conscious. Until then, enjoy your slumber.

You’re welcome.

Come back with a defense.

Topic: Serious Discussion / The ideal military government?

For the money. That makes me laugh every time. Personnel get paid enough to feed them and their families. They aren’t taking vacations everywhere all of the time on the golf course with Tiger Woods like Mr.Prez.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Kim Jong UN

Originally posted by alxje:

no leader should stand above his people, but amongst or infront of them.A big part of the North korean population is starving, yet kim jong un isn’t. For once, focus on the well being of his people, even if you have to make sacrifices…

LOL, not gonna happen, he’s not only a communist, he’s a communist LEADER.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Once again, gun violence occurs MOST where there is the MOST gun control.

People die from shootings every week in cesspools like Chicago, because people obtain weapons ILLEGALLY. Weapons are ALREADY ILLEGAL there.

Strangely, so is murder.

’Tis a strange thought. Murder is illegal but people still commit murder! /sarcasm

And people were awfully good at murdering people BEFORE guns had even been invented.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

Hey, if you want to follow the same old rhetoric ad naseum, have at it.
This debate is going nowhere if you continue to feed into their stupidity.
You just push it further back.
Enjoy your benefits.

Stop pushing it back, then.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by onlineidiot1994:

I think it’s funny how most of SD completely rejects anyone who’s conservative and resorts to name calling. It makes me almost ashamed to consider myself liberal.

That said, weapons only lead to more violence. The idea of protecting yourself is a nice excuse but then, what about those who are morally against using violence, even in self defense?

What about them?

How about gasp *choosing (whoa) to be a pacifist under all circumstances and get murdered in a Chicago alley at night?

Notice how I don’t say “a Texas alley”. That’s because more violence IN GENERAL, INCLUDING GUN VIOLENCE, occurs in areas that already have strict gun control.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

You first :)

Being an idiot is easy, as you have clearly exemplified. slow clap

Namecalling is not a defense.

You should wait for tenco or someone to do the talking for you.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

About Godwin’s law, we could talk about how Stalin, Castro, Kimmy, etc. etc. etc. disarmed the citizenry instead.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

Troll harder.

Be your guest.

Come up with an actual defense or leave.

Oh, and since nobody likes me except issendorf and Jhco, aren’t the minorities always supposed to be the victim?

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by Draconavin:

PatriotSaint, you’re a moron, just give up now and go waddle in OT’s cesspool of ignorant stupidity.
Go now.
No one likes you. Jhco just agrees with you because no one is siding with him except for issendorf, the devil’s advocate.
Conservative stupidity needs to just end. Now better than letting this shit continue.

Haha, look. Poor Draco can’t even come up with an actual defense other than “you’re stupid, nobody likes you”.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Kim Jong UN

Originally posted by Draconavin:

He’s my hero :3

Regardless of your obvious sarcasm, I wouldn’t be surprised.

Unless, of course, that wasn’t sarcasm.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Kermit Gosnell

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO4ZkL9WVh8

Yes, this is not Gosnell, but nevertheless an interesting find.

Topic: Serious Discussion / The ideal military government?

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

Also because those glorious college professors are too important to get their sleeves dirty.

I had no idea anti-intellectuals were so resentful about their lot in life.

I suppose that makes you an intellectual. ’Gratz.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO4ZkL9WVh8

Topic: Serious Discussion / The ideal military government?

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

uh…?

I have no idea what you’re talking about. But yeah, throughout history it tends to be lower-class rejects who enlist. Just to spell it out for you.

Yay for reverse racism!

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Well, some of the liberals are gun owners themselves.

Basically, only the self-and-buddy-proclaimed intellectual elite should be able to have guns. Oh, and politicians and their armed bodyguards. Oh, and movie stars and their armed bodyguards.

And some angry guys fighting other angry guys in Syria and such. In fact, why just give these random people military grade fully-automatic weaponry if we can send them high-explosives and anti-armor weapons, too. At least they’re just piece-o-crap RPG-7s.

Yup, those guys can handle it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4vOr4mBuZw

But not those dirty hicks from the South and West (a.k.a the Wild West, where Americans buy guns to kill and loot people… wait, ain’t that Chicago?) and TexRussia. (?)

Wait… ;)

https://www.youtube.com/user/FPSRussia?feature=watch

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Is this the part where the thread disappears into the realm of nothingness due to venturing into the realm of awkwardness?

Topic: Off-topic / 5 year old kills 2 year old with a gun "for kids" that he got as a gift

Originally posted by CarlSweatpants:

My grandfather lost an eye due to being shot in the face with an arrow by his sister when he was a kid

I can see a gun misfiring, but how the crap do you accidentally shoot someone in the eye with a bow?

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Originally posted by tenco1:

Originally posted by thecartm:
If you don’t believe that the government would take over power in such an opportunity, look up the holocaust and Hitler’s rise to power.

Godwin’s law. That is all.

Great verbal gymnastics you got there.

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

Oh, and coconuts are dangerous. Especially assault coconuts. They look scary.