Recent posts by Aenarion on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Off-Topic] Superheroes & Villains contest: Choose your favorite characters now!

I kinda hate superman.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Goal] 1500 tournament rating

It takes a lot of discipline to stop with great but not that great draws^^

As CapdriveR said you could just play 5%+ decks, if you have some gold to waste by not even attempting with worse draws. I think 1500 is very doable ;) GL.

As for the phobos deck it’s pretty slow I guess even with the wall you can still lose to the occasional syco or stuff. Not having Corilane is also a big deal I guess xD.

I’d just play Phobos, Purity, Enclave and such since they are less draw dependant…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Collaborator Nominations for the Players' Pack

Awesome they’re actually considering it! I’d have love to contribute but even if I had made it to the team somehow I really don’t have time. I see many great name in the nominations so it looks like we’d be in good hands anyway :)

As a side note, PvP is great for a game’s longevity, but PvP here needs some serious work as well as PvE at this point.

As for sealed experience, imho, a sealed veteran can be great at card creation and a standard veteran could still suck at it because he might have just been netdecking. There were periods of time you really didn’t need much deckbuilding skill or understanding of the format to do well in standard. Don’t overestimate its importance for these nominations, especially recent standards.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / OoD Crushes Ghost Walking

There’s a general lack of activity right now tbh, even top factions are “casual” somehow…no comparison with the degree of commitment that was required in the past imho ;)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / OoD Crushes Ghost Walking

Originally posted by MSUSpartan3096:

Nice scores..glad folks are having fun…I wonder if the “casual” OoD members have the stomach for what it takes to be a long-term successful faction (#1-#2). Hopefully far more “drama” will come out of this little rivalry.

I guess that goes for any faction at those spots, including current ones…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Is Kogoth that good?

It isn’t meant for grims imho, it’s an extra IM. Any deck who plays IM will be happy to have a second one.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Is Kogoth that good?

A second Iron Maiden is great in some decks. Ofc it does take the legendary slot but it’s also pretty fast and with some offensive potential (i.e. good vs fear unlike HoC), I really like the card.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / OoD Crushes Ghost Walking

Originally posted by supermooo:

H Epic battle guys on BOTH sides. I have never personally been part of a war like this and it was awe-inspiring!

Yeah big close wars are really something! Gratz guys :)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Who do you like better MSUSpartan3096 or OOHnirav

Kenei you don’t count ;)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / 2nd Upgraded Pack Deck Construction Thread

Shieru shut up. Please.

I’m curious about HB too.

Hijacker could potentially activate way more than twice if you can heal/protect him, but it’s not easy as the on-attacked skills require him to be on the right side of the field usually. Maybe Hijacker => Twincannon, depends on who’s gonna attack him.

Sunspear also could find a place in imp decks, maybe 1 copy.

Kogoth is what I’m looking forward to tho :D

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Spoiler] New Upgrade Pack 2

I would remove Kapak*, looks like a slap to p2p people.

Kogoth* is very interesting, I think something like that could shake the meta a bit. It’s obviously NOT a powercreep of IM (vets calling it that, cmon you’ve been playing long enough to be able to understand that), it could bring Strike All back a bit, and it’s also a step towards QS.

Hijacker is very interesting, looks like it can really wreak havoc especially with some support.

Raptor at last, glad I only bought one with WB…

But overall the upgrades are meh, poor card choice imho. They should have focused more on old sets I think, maybe we’ll see that in pack 3 but I doubt it at this point.

Also Nexor… please, please don’t make him so crappy. He’s unplayable. With that shy protect 1 and no siege he doesn’t even begin to compare to Kleave.

Makes much more sense to me.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Community Contest] Create your own card - Season 4 - part B - WINNER: Deimos

Originally posted by Loop_Stratos:


For finals, i will vote metis anyway.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [dev] new pack for september

lol FAIL.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

It’s convenient to bring it all down to a “no u” contest when you’ve been on the wrong side for so long I guess…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

I have to agree with light. After all our lives can all just be a dream of some sleeping giant, how can we be sure of anything, let alone some data gathered over a few weeks/months, on the internet?

Even more so when such data proves GW cheating, it HAS TO BE false!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

So you chose to be blind. Noted :) Have a good one.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

Originally posted by lightmoon:

Same nonsense is basically same accusations being thrown at each other. The proof doesn’t prove anything. Us not showing anything and you showing something doesn’t put the same shitstorm we’re throwing at each other any different.

Proofs usually prove stuff. It’s different because we can actually back up what we’re saying while you’re just throwing shit, as you said. Whatever.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

Don’t play games light. I never complained you don’t have proof about surging, I asked you to show it since you claimed you had it. Were you lying?

I couldn’t care less about what Hexagons says, he seems not to have any clue about when I joined either, see who “talks out his ass”, lol.

As for “same nonsense”. No. We gave you proof of your members sharing/botting. There’s a link. Show me proof of BW doing the same.

If you can’t, just shut up. And maybe try to fix your “honest and legit” faction.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

@light: I wasn’t the one to bring it up. Someone said GW won because of their surging superiority, and I merely replied it wasn’t true in my experience. You claimed you had proof of the contrary and then backpedaled.

And it’s not “the same nonsense”. We linked our data. You won’t do the same. Don’t put us on the same level.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

Originally posted by lightmoon:

Like I said earlier, I am not obligated nor am I willing to show such data. Please be gone and stop harassing me for it.

Then stop accusing other people, if you’re not even willing to back it up with your so-called proof. I’m sorry light but this is too much.

I’m also still waiting on linx for the surging-superiority proof, /w’d him yesterday but he ignored me. So much for your data…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

light, you should’ve stopped way earlier, now it’s too late. You have evidence of your members botting/sharing or w/e is in those graphs. Now since you claim you have the same evidence of for BW, you too should

or wear the shoe, ’cause it fits pretty damn well.

As for Sigha, there’s a link a page or two ago, try that.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

Originally posted by BadMisterFrosty:
Originally posted by Aenarion:

Last thing, what in the world is wrong with having spies?

As you can see lightmoon provided clear cut proof that multiple members of BW’s inner core controlled alt “spy” accounts. What is disconcerting is that it is not just GW that BW has placed accounts with multi user access, but have done so in other factions such as Grizzly Bairs and OoD (of course that doesn’t matter now since you merged with them). Of course, BW members will continue to spam the thread with meme’s and gifs to bump up post’s like Lightmoon’s exposing BW for the ToS violating faction they have been for years.

You can’t be serious, what is wrong with placing alts in other factions. First off, if the faction you have placed the alt in is a faction you war with, then that is alt interaction which is strictly prohibited by the ToS. Furthermore, BW allows many members to have access to the account, which is essentially account sharing. So more ToS violation on top of ToS Violation.

First of, I say there’s nothing wrong with spies, not with alt-spies. As for account interaction, yes it’s against ToS. However if you use your alt to gain an advantage in a war you’ll likely be instantly exposed in the faction you’re spying on anyway.

Lastly, BW allowing many members to access such hypothetical account is only your theory, let’s not confuse fact/fiction.

@light: “baseless accusation”, heard this one before…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

lol Light no, there’s no unfair disadvantage with spies. It’s a fair disadvantage. Now if the spy is also an alt of someone in your rival faction, that might and might not be a different matter, I haven’t given it a thought yet tbh.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

Originally posted by BadMisterFrosty:
Originally posted by Aenarion:

First you claim you have data about how you’ve had better surge rate in every war, literally… when asked to provide such data, backpedaling to “we won more wars during weak times than you”.

Now since as far as I remember you had more activity overall except the period right after naduod left maybe, sometimes even during your supposed “weak” time, it’s not really as simple as you make it. You guys never really proved to be superior surgers (although very good ofc), the main reason you beat us was definitely superior activity ;) The problem is that admitting it would kill all the acc-sharing accusations towards BW, and we can’t let that happen can we?

Losing a war does NOT illustrate a faction is no account sharing. It just means the members who cycle through dead accounts or other members accounts were either not on during that war OR didn’t have enough time to cycle through all the accounts. Using Dead account which have no kong activity for 8+ months OR are from players that quit and told people they quit who can confirm this is a tactic BW has employed and is strictly prohibited by the ToS.

As lightmoon has stated, GW out surged BW despite having lower activity for a period of time before BW stopped attacking GW. The length of this time seems to be the only thing in question here.

Also as I previous stated, accounts such a sushji, domico69, Alien_nation, BusterKeaton, OrgreSean are confirmed BW alt accounts that more than one BW member has excess too, specifically the BW inner core. This has been confirmed multiple times, including by ex BW members. Coincidentally, this tactic is also against the ToS. These accounts have all tried to apply to GW, in some cases multiple times. They were rejected and went back to BW. In the case domico69 and sushji, they were discovered to be spies and subsequently kicked from GW. I only name these accounts because the community should know incase they see one apply to their faction in the future.

I would consider the period when both factions were still strong. So I wouldn’t count BW after we stopped attacking and GW right after naduod and some others left. In the rest we definitely weren’t surging worse than GW. In fact I recall GW having more fighters than we did, if anything.

As for alts accessible for more than one BW member, proof plz, becase all these sharing accusations are meaningless otherwise. And again, don’t be so sure GW is 100% sharing-proof either ;)

Last thing, what in the world is wrong with having spies?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Drama] Proof of BW Win Trading

You were being farmed right after naduod left. There’s no contradiction in what I said. You went back on top afterwards when our activity dropped and and the same time yours increased. You did not have better overall surging, at least not until a month or two ago when we blatantly stopped trying against you.