Recent posts by finkidz5 on Kongregate

Subscribe to Recent posts by finkidz5 on Kongregate

avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How would Plug 'n' Play sexual organs redefine the concept of gay and straight?

… for some reason my post isn’t showing up (probably a problem with my computer) so I can’t edit my post, but I’d like to add that it won’t change much. Of course there are going to be more changeovers, with this new and improved, easier-to-use technology.

EDIT: I dunno what happened, but what I said was, I don’t things will change (much). It’s utterly repulsive to most to change genders, even putting sterility aside. Is it considered gay? Well, how does society view a gender change now? That would remain the same.

I had a nice post written out, I don’t feel like rewriting it now. Maybe tomorrow, but I’m off to bed now.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How would Plug 'n' Play sexual organs redefine the concept of gay and straight?

I don’t think anything would change. Even today, the idea of a gender change is utterly repulsive to most, even taking sterility out of the picture. As for ‘straight’ versus ‘gay’, when someone today changes genders and partners with the opposite sex (i.e. the gender they changed from), are they considered gay by today’s standards? As far as I know they are (feel free to correct me on this).

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How do you tell a girl that you like her?

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

Here’s a good one.

I just laughed so hard. Thank you for making my day. :D

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How do you tell a girl that you like her?

Invite her to a setting that would allow you to be together alone. (For example, the beach, the park, etc. The cinema is not such a great idea the first time, because you aren’t really talking.) Don’t expect anything to happen, it’ll just tighten your friendship. It helps that you guys are friends already, and both are of the same social group. It’s possible that she has shown indications of liking you, but you just haven’t picked them up. For instance, if you jog, ask her to go with you. Ask her to study for a test together. It should get to the point that you won’t need to say anything, because it’s a given that you feel that way and she feels the same way about you. If she seems unterested, do not push harder.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How do you tell a girl that you like her?

What are her feelings towards you? Are there any indications that she feels that way towards you? What is your relationship with her? What is your status among your peers (how popular are you)?

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / You are not here right now.

Originally posted by denamo:

Yeah, maybe you are right. What about it? It’s not like knowing this changes anything, or makes you more intelligent than other people.

.. way to sum up almost every single thread in SD.
But yeah, while it’s great food for thought, DR pretty much said it correctly. In both posts.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Criminal?

Vika, if the infector doesn’t know, this whole discussion goes out the window. My point was if the victim is unaware that their partner has a disease, and the partner isn’t sharing that information (or lies about it, aimed at axlk), then obviously this isn’t such a good match up, and they are simply together for the physical pleasure aspect of a relationship. As I said:

“…if someone isn’t going to be straight enough with you that they won’t even provide this information, then maybe this isn’t the type of character you should be bedding with.”

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / You are not here right now.

Related.

While this was a fictional story I read a few months ago, it essentially addresses the points you make. Quite a good read, if I may add.

On the planet ‘Placet’, at certain times during the day, light slows down to the speed of sound. Since you got this far already, I’ll let you think and try to figure out what that would do to your perception of the world. ;)

Also- I don’t feel as this is a fair title for the thread; none of this would apply if you were, say, blind, so I think it’s fair to say that you are here right now, you just don’t perceive it to be that way.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Criminal?

If one is in a situation where it is impossible to confirm his partner as healthy, then maybe one should be more careful not to hop into bed with the first yuckaputz who shows a little leg. Sorry if that comes across as a bit obnoxious, but I can’t imagine that anyone with true feelings towards another would ever infect them on purpose. It’s certainly possible, however, that my teenage naivety comes into play here, but I truly believe that if someone isn’t going to be straight enough with you that they won’t even provide this information, then maybe this isn’t the type of character you should be bedding with.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Criminal?

Originally posted by fma1:

If you know that you have an STD and your partner doesn’t know and you spread it to them, yes, you should be prosecuted.

I disagree. STDs are spread through very intimate actions, and, as such, I would say that it is the ‘receiving’ party’s (that is, the one being infected) responsibility to be very sure the person they are sleeping with is disease-free. While I don’t say the ‘infector’ is right in doing this (from a moral standpoint), I don’t see how one can be prosecuted by the law for doing this act that is totally consensual by both involved.

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

YUP

Obviously though, others disagree. :P

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / PETA's "unorthodox" campaigns

One might say this is very interesting, but can you please elaborate on what exactly is to be discussed?

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / What's your religion?

Jewish. Though I constantly read philosophical/scientific works to challenge my faith. As for the whole evolution thing, it’s possible to say that evolution fits with religion, even the Bible itself, since, from a religious perpective, creation has always been described in a very vague/mysterious fashion.

Originally posted by vikaTae:

If evolution is a religion, then it is one which all humans, other animals, plants and insects subscribe to. You joined it before you were born, and don’t have a choice of leaving it.


It is as much a religion as ‘eating food when you are hungry’ is a religion.

… and this pretty much sums it up. Thanks for the laugh. :P

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / You are God.

Originally posted by Indy111:

If they don’t, I’ll help them evolve.

How so?

Originally posted by JohnRulz:

Some considerations need to be taken into account here: Did I exist before this moment? Did I create these people and this island? Is this universe predetermined, or ruled by free will? Can I alter the past? As a god, am I omniscient and perfect?

I fail to see the practical difference, for the sake of the question.

Originally posted by LtB8816:

Because God is capitalized in the title. Did I ever say that? No, I did not. But, when Capitalized, God refers almost always to the Judeo-Christian or the Muslim God. If the OP meant another god, he would have most likely specified by saying Buddah or Thor or whatever. Make sense?

Interestingly enough, I happen to be Jewish, and the book was written in reference to the Jewish God, but it doesn’t matter for the sake of this discussion. Besides, no matter what faith, you essentially attribute the same features/abilities to God. As for the ‘G’ as opposed to ‘g’, I didn’t mean anything by it. I just thought grammatically it’d be more correct to capitalize it.

And in your previous post, what do you mean by ‘the author needs to do some research’? This model wasn’t to say you are God as in THE God, or a god at all for that matter. It was just meant in a way that you are in a position to play the role of God. I feel as if you missed the whole point of this thread.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / You are God.

The Problem:

You are given an island where several tribes live.

By nature and culture, these tribes are exploitative and belligerent. This results in much suffering on the island, caused by war poverty and prejudice.

They have been living this way for centuries without any sign of improvement.

Your Assignment:

To try to improve this society.

To teach its members to live together in harmony and reduce suffering to a minimum or eliminate it entirely.

To create a healthy society.

Your Resources:

You have all the resources that a highly advanced technology can offer.

You have the entire island under surveillance and can see what is happening in any place at any time.

You have such devices as cloud-seeding equipment and can plant underground explosives. Within reason, you can control weather, flooding, volcanoes and earthquakes, and produce any “natural” phenomenon on cue.

You also have devices that can be used to implant ideas through subliminal suggestion. You can implant ideas to entire populations or to certain select leaders.

However, you must take into account the sever limitations of subliminal suggestion. If you try to implant any ideas that go against the basic nature of the populace, they will be totally rejected and your efforts will be in vain.

One alternative would be to implant ideas that somehow would make use of the acknowledged bad nature of these people.

Your Restrictions:

Under no circumstances are the natives of this island to be aware of your presence.

This supersedes all other considerations.

The cultural shock caused by your revealing yourself would disrupt the entire fabric of the island culture. It would cause much suffering and more than offset any good that you could possibly accomplish.

The natives would be reduced to a state of almost vegetable-like dependence from which they would be unlikely to recover. If they did recover, they might rebel so violently as to eliminate any positive values they might have originally had.

Therefore, the restrictions that you not reveal yourself must be followed without exception under any circumstances.

But aside from this restriction, you have a free hand to proceed as humanely or as ruthlessly as you see fit.

In short, you have the opportunity to play God.

What would you do?

(Note: I did not write this. It is a direct quote from a philosophy book I was reading (it was addressing the question as to why, if God exists, does He ignore suffering. This thread is not here to address that question), and I am just curious to see what you guys come up with. Also- I considered putting this in the FG forum, but I decided it’s not so much a ‘game’ as it is just a place for you to respond as to what course of action you would take in this situation. I had it in OT, but that didn’t work out, so here we are.)

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / The Departing Thread

Guys, it’s been a wild ride. I am leaving tomorrow, so I want to say goodbye. I left a long message on my profile, as well as some shout-outs to many of you, so check it out. Take care, and thanks for the great times! I’ll be back eventually. :D

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / DC vs Marvel

Originally posted by chesshawk:
Originally posted by onlineidiot1994:
Originally posted by chesshawk:

Who reads comics these days?

Anyone who went to this?

That encompasses more than just comics, and comics are definitely dying.

It’s not considered cool anymore to read and collect comics; it’s seen as nerdy.
I’m pretty sure that comic book sales are going down.

As such, the value of old comics go up. Marvel has been killing many of their heroes through the Civil War/Ultimatum story arcs.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / DC vs Marvel

Marvel. No question.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / since vegard is not active, who is current king of ot?

Kissing ass to… Vegard? That doesn’t even make any sense. Besides, I was stating my true thoughts on the matter.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / since vegard is not active, who is current king of ot?

Originally posted by Nightpatrol:

Is it wrong of me if a tiny of bit me is disappointed he didn’t kill himself? i mean nothing personal, but i think it would be cool if a forum could fuck someone up that bad.

Uh… no, it wouldn’t really be cool at all.
In all honesty, when Vegard ‘killed’ himself, I felt like a piece of shit for a while even though I had nothing to do with it…. >___>

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / You need to crap real badly

Related

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Who is your favorite actor/actress?

Jack Nicholson.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / cummy_jerk

1) …Really?
2) No.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Playing the odds.

Originally posted by banana332:
Originally posted by finkidz5:
Originally posted by Jeimuzu185:

Buying 2/3 makes plus 50%?
You sir cannot do maths.

Well, it’s a 50 percent chance of winning with one ticket. 50 percent is defined as ‘for every two tickets, one will win’. So if you buy two, then you are statistically going to win. Get it? :P

One ticket isn’t 50% if there’s 1,000 tickets total.

argues
Yes it is, it’s either a winning ticket, or it’s not. 50/50
Disprove this logic, dare ya.

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Playing the odds.

Originally posted by Jeimuzu185:

Buying 2/3 makes plus 50%?
You sir cannot do maths.

Well, it’s a 50 percent chance of winning with one ticket. 50 percent is defined as ‘for every two tickets, one will win’. So if you buy two, then you are statistically going to win. Get it? :P

 
avatar for finkidz5 finkidz5 2796 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / StaringCheese is my alt

Originally posted by StaringCheese:

TL;DR you lying sack of shit, I’m not your alt.

….well.

/thread