Recent posts by Fronebular on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Fronebular:

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

you did good, i’m full now.

You get fed vicariously? Kinda pathetic dude…

LOL….ya don’t know even the half of it.
He’ll eat your brain….if you leave your mind open.

That’s just sad… To think that he’s so needy for attention he’s able to drain the life out of other peoples’ conversations to sustain him.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Redskins: deraugatory or salutary?

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by RollerCROWster:

its up to white people to protect those brown people!!!!!

Well, maybe…..at the very least, stop shitting on them. That would be nice.
Ya know, like we did….-will do-….aw fuck, have managed to make it extreeeeeemely “unpopular” to be racist towards Blacks.

Like you care about what the “non-whites” feel, you racist.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Why do we get the most fun trolls when I’m either asleep or at work? Especially when they’re trying to troll my posts, you would think they’d have the common decency to wait till I’m around to do it…

I didn’t wait because obviously your opinion is worthless in the eyes of these misogynists! Like a woman could possibly have something to contribute here.

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

you did good, i’m full now.

You get fed vicariously? Kinda pathetic dude…

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by Helltank:
I believe if those kinds of pictures did not get those girls attention from guys, they wouldn’t take them

…and that’s where you strayed from evidence into opinion.

So it’s not okay to generalize ALL women…. specific group of women?

Point out where the fuck this happened.

she was totally condoning…. sluts

Now you’re just making shit up.

it’s clear how much you hate women! … disgusting.

….. and now you’ve crossed the line into outright trolling.

So you mean to tell me that this doesn’t have misogyny? Really?

Vika never said it was wrong to make generalizations.

By consenting to defend this point, one agrees that generalizations are okay.

That we all wish to “post selfies on social media just to have the opposite sex come slobbering all over them telling them how good looking they are

This generalization is okay to make.

Find a group of geeky or gamer girls, and you will find many individuals who have similar interests to you

This generalization is okay to make.

Both generalization place women into a stereotypical role that is not representative of each individual woman while also placing them in a negative light.

This view point has been defended by multiple SDers

SD is sexist.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / GRAPHICDESIGNC is the gayest person in OT

Commence the sex feast party!

Bring my whip! No one’s leaving until they’ve screamed uncle in 69 languages!

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by Kasic:
And now you’re assuming the I’m using sarcasm when I’m clearly not! I’m taking a persecutive tone because it’s clear how much you all hate women.To think you would even try to justify this misogyny is disgusting.

I admit, I laughed.

At what? The fact that you think all women are sluts? Deplorable!

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by Kasic:
Oh I totally get it now, because she was totally condoning generalizing all women as drunken sluts who take selfies.

You use sarcasm which indicates you think Vika does not condone generalizing all women as drunken sluts who take selfies. As that is what her posts explicitly say and that is the correct interpretation of them, what are you having an issue with again? Disagreeing with generalizing 50% of the human race based on their sex which is irrelevant to other factors is not mutually exclusive with generalizing a group defined by having that attribute. All red apples are fruit, but not all fruit are apples.

And now you’re assuming the I’m using sarcasm when I’m clearly not! I’m taking a persecutive tone because it’s clear how much you all hate women.To think you would even try to justify this misogyny is disgusting.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / OT = Most Active Forums on Kongregate?

More active than SD anyways. Those poor sods are so desperate for activity they’ll bite just about anything.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by Kasic:
So it’s not okay to generalize ALL women, but it is okay to generalize a specific group of women?

Two issues here. Firstly, Vika never said it was wrong to make generalizations. Secondly, a generalization about a sub-set that shares a common interest or trait can necessarily be generalized to have that interest or trait. That is self defined. What Vika called out was the generalization of women as a whole, not the generalization about any group at all.

Try comprehending other’s words before assuming they said something they didn’t and making a fool of yourself.

Oh I totally get it now, because she was totally condoning generalizing all women as drunken sluts who take selfies.

So I guess you guys just hate women.

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

don’t let these guys keep you down. your tears will provide ample sustenance for me during my next hibernation cycle. please, continue your baseless denunciations!

Even sporadic posting habits will make you a regular here in SD! Remember, this place is dead.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Just had an ephiphany about the american justice system

Originally posted by CrowbarOfJustice:
Originally posted by Immortal7777:

More like. I think he might do it so we will lock them up so they don’t.

yeah :(

it infuriates me that people actually think this way
They don’t understand that just because someone can be guilty doesn’t mean they are, and when you put the wrong guy in jail the actual criminal gets away scott free to victimise even more people. And in the end they could end up hurting more people than they save.

Jury nullification is a bitch, but it’s also a grand ol’ American tradition that must be kept!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by tenco1:
Originally posted by Fronebular:

Well well, aren’t you the kind of special person that’s able to contradict themselves in the same paragraph without anyone else catching it. What a talent!

Except it isn’t contradicting.

So, nya.

So it’s not okay to generalize ALL women, but it is okay to generalize a specific group of women?

Good to see where your morals are!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

I’m sure you all think the solution is to keep guns away from black people.

Just be sure to call them minorities while you keep them suppressed.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Why do non "white" humans cause more crime then "white" Humans? (USA)

Oh noes! They used the terms “white” and “non-white” instead of “Caucasian” and “minorities”!

Gods help us how can we maintain out PC relations with them niggas if we can’t even label people correctly?!

Also, the thread could have been ended in as few words as, “It’s not race, it’s SES,” but that would have been boring I guess.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Are you nuts? She's gorgeous!

Originally posted by vikaTae:

It’s just you.

You are making sweeping generalisations that all women are the same. Claiming we all have the same interests and same outlook on life. That we all wish to “post selfies on social media just to have the opposite sex come slobbering all over them telling them how good looking they are”.

Find a group of geeky or gamer girls, and you will find many individuals who have similar interests to you. Start poking around the introverts and you’ll I suspect, be very surprised at what you find. It is purely because you are seeking out the shallow kind of person that you are having this kind of issue.

Well well, aren’t you the kind of special person that’s able to contradict themselves in the same paragraph without anyone else catching it. What a talent!

Damn, I spent three seconds looking at SD bickering and already they have me doing it too. What a sadistic infection!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Behind shy guy's mask?

They’re all self-conscious burn victims! Why else do you think they’re covered head to toe in a thick robe that blocks all sunlight and contaminants?

So, when you remove the mask you would see an adorable burn victim like this:

hanako photo: hanako char_hanako.jpg

My deductive reasoning is incredible.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / This has bothered me for some time now...

Bad habit.

Well, do try remedy it. That’s general thread 101 stiff.

Also, if you’re only replying to a small portion of a post (such as this case) then it’s usually neater to quote only the portion that you’re replying to. Don’t worry though everyone will have you up to posting speed in no time.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / This has bothered me for some time now...

It boils down to a selective memory bias. We’re prone to think more fondly of times in the past because we remember the good times and forget the bad.

Like the time that you left something alone for years, remembered how much you thought you loved it, and then returned to it only to be disappointed. That’s why you hear geezers go on and on about the good ol’ days.

Also, please stop quoting the OP Ganthro. You’re singling yourself out more than need be.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / What kind of forum is this?

Yes, give that which is intended to have no direction a path to take.

If you make out a goal other than time wasting you’re doing it wrong. That’s the only objective with any Off Topic forum and this one is not particularly special in any way.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / TerribleToaster's Homework Help Hot Line

Originally posted by GRAPHICDESIGNC:

Word problems are a bitch! Ya think ya know what they’re asking and BAM! Brick wall with spikes and organs.

My problem with word problems is that they are fucking retarded and never provide enough information.

I say when it comes to those guys read em thrice. Half the problem of a word problem is interpreting said problem correctly.

Unless you’re doing SAT stuff, then you read half the question and make and educated guess.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / The Girl I Love Gets Touched By Other Guys Than Me

What’s that? The supreme gentleman is having girl problems?

Now where did I hear that before?…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / TerribleToaster's Homework Help Hot Line

Originally posted by GRAPHICDESIGNC:
Originally posted by FULLMEASUREZAM:

If there are three bags of coins. One with two gold ones, one with a gold and a silver coin, and one with two silvers. If you pull a gold coin out of the bag, what is the probability that the next coin will also be gold?

Okay well based on the wording I’m under the assumption that each bag has 2 coins. So for your first bag you have a 100% probability, the second bag you have a 50% probability, and the last bag it’s a 0% probability because there are no gold coins in that bag. To average these bags (to get the mean) you simply add them all together, so 150%, then you divide it by 3 (how many percentages you’re averaging), and that will come to 50%. So the answer should be 50%

Word problems are a bitch! Ya think ya know what they’re asking and BAM! Brick wall with spikes and organs.