Recent posts by stalliga888 on Kongregate

Topic: Time World / PM dont you dare!

Yeh i do have CC38 on my 3rd planet and i have a level 37CC on my 2nd and i still don’t want buildings to be increased in level cap!

Topic: Time World / Heroes and Villains

I would generally be on your side waraxe as your a Mu, however this forum is about villains and heroes. You have not stated who is a villain or hero yet and have turned the forum into an argument. Please make reference to the forum topic. Thanks.

Topic: Time World / Heroes and Villains

Ah i remember those days. Death to Loki and his galaxy’s as my galaxy message lol. How times change :P

Topic: Time World / PM dont you dare!

No i agree with LordShoe unless you golded you shouldn’t have level 40 CC yet and the heck do you have level 40 buildings all round. Allow the lesser players to catch up a little the gap is becoming so huge between new and old players. It is demoralizing for new players, thinking they will never reach the top. Buildings and techs should be capped at some point.

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Originally posted by playmage:

The flash client has been patched so private chat should be defaulted again (refresh may be required for those already in the game).

This has helped. Placement was rather annoying before. :)

Topic: Time World / What sort of game is this.

(-53) Dating (93 games)
(-953) Dinosaur (108 games)

Well it sure as hell ain’t a Dinosaur game. It’s 11x more of a dating game than a dinosaur game lol.

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Are we going to get a graphics update for higher level buildings like we originally were???

Topic: Time World / Heroes and Villains

Ok so there are people in the game we really like and dislike. Name the hero and villain in TW from your perspective. :)

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

PLAYMAGE PLEASE READ THIS AND CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL. I KNOW IT WILL TAKE TIME RE PROGRAMMING THE BUILD SYSTEM ALGORITHM BUT THIS WORKS BETTER.

Thanks :) (Caps was used to gain attention)

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Originally posted by claytonde:

Pirates and summoner need a speed up button. PM you keep saying no to this but it is needed. When doing insane summoner it takes 30-45mins for one game at times. And often the game is won, but you have to wait for 30 odd movements on the board equaling 2 mins of pointless animation x say 10 more rounds = 20 mins player time wasted. Rough estimate but I play a lot seems about right. Same for pirates – we all know what is going to happen when we play our card, why not give the experience players chance to do it faster?

+1. I have had players asking me if i’m going to make insane summoners and i’ve told them i do not do them anymore. I’ve also told players that have invited me to insane summoners not to invite me anymore. It’s a complete waste of time. Hard staudt takes 40-50 minutes to do 5 whereas summoner takes up to and sometimes over 2 and half hours. Is completely ridiculous.

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

Originally posted by waraxe:

Originally posted by boredpoo:

Originally posted by stalliga888:

I believe the person who first attained the rank should be placed 1st and the person who achieved it 2nd be placed 2nd etc. Also the build rank should take into consideration the combined levels of all buildings rather than those that are highest. This would be a true representation of a persons build level. Simply adding the levels would do. Or 10 points for a level 1 building 20 for a level 2 building etc and add the point score. I think this would be a more valid way of quantifying a players build rank.

And do you propose that your new calculation of point score add to a player’s Power like the current point score does?

I think this is an interesting point because the logic of having it scale with the highest building is because that’s going to benefit you and excess hurts. A level 20 lab is useless if you have a level 35 lab in the sense of helping out with power (and assuming techs>20) but if it were to add power, that could bring stronger opponents to your planets.

The argument abut lower level labs is understandable. However i am sure there a lot of players including myself do not have all tech’s at level 20. This building should still be included into a persons build rank. The idea that lower level buildings become worthless is nonsense. Level 20 ore mines still provide ore the same as level 30 ore mines do. I agree no to the same extent but they still prove to be of worth as with all buildings. The time and resources has been spent to raise that building to that level. So why should it no be included in the build rank? …. (Good question)… (I’m glad i asked). The answer is it should be! A lower level building should not accrue the same score as it’s higher level counterpart but still be given a much larger value than it currently delivers. An accurate and just system is explained in my previous post. Please support it.

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

Originally posted by boredpoo:

Originally posted by stalliga888:

I believe the person who first attained the rank should be placed 1st and the person who achieved it 2nd be placed 2nd etc. Also the build rank should take into consideration the combined levels of all buildings rather than those that are highest. This would be a true representation of a persons build level. Simply adding the levels would do. Or 10 points for a level 1 building 20 for a level 2 building etc and add the point score. I think this would be a more valid way of quantifying a players build rank.

And do you propose that your new calculation of point score add to a player’s Power like the current point score does?

No i do not think build score should be combined with a players power. Building rank has very little to do with power. Technology has been separated and combined with power as technology has a direct impact on the players power. However is the level of the Ore mine or Control Center really a representation of a persons power? These buildings have no effect on the outcome of a battle. One may argue that the emplacement does have a significant effect yet a players emplacement level may range from level 1 – 40. Therefore a build score simply for emplacements would also not be representative of a players power on an individual planet. Build rank should be excluded from a players power.

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

I believe the person who first attained the rank should be placed 1st and the person who achieved it 2nd be placed 2nd etc. Also the build rank should take into consideration the combined levels of all buildings rather than those that are highest. This would be a true representation of a persons build level. Simply adding the levels would do. Or 10 points for a level 1 building 20 for a level 2 building etc and add the point score. I think this would be a more valid way of quantifying a players build rank.

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Originally posted by nvillian:

Originally posted by stalliga888:

Why do players that have played this game for a period of months slate the game. Your clearly not gunna stop playing…

Why do players that have played this game for a period of months slate the game(?) You’re clearly not going to stop playing…

FIXED!

I assumed your first sentence was asking a question but for the life of me I couldn’t find a question mark!

Your second sentence suggests ownership of a ‘clearly’ with your usage of “Your clearly”. Since I do not believe there is such an object, that can have ownership over it, called a ‘clearly’ I have to assume you meant “You’re” or “You are”.

“Gunna” isn’t a word even by Ebonics standards/definitions. That’s just horrible.

Didn’t realise a TimeWorld forum thread had to be written in English prose. _
Secondly the first line wasn’t a question in the conventional sense, it was rhetorical….

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Why do players that have played this game for a period of months slate the game. Your clearly not gunna stop playing…

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

Pfft your not even 1st

Topic: Time World / Chat

Originally posted by Atomslaya:

Originally posted by anshulratchet:

Im more interested in how the hell u got 32m energy being in g8…;)

Through generous donations by other players visiting and leaving behind valuable debris :D

Too true >:)

Topic: Time World / Building Rankings

If there are several players at the same ranking in build rank what decides who comes 1st? E.g Rank 30 – 37 all have the same build score of 2,990,000. What decides these rankings when score is the same?

Topic: Time World / Chat

I’m all about building. Would have had more but spent it converting it to creds :P

Topic: Time World / Chat

“http://tinypic.com/r/dpgzdw/6” “http://tinypic.com/r/dqtafc/6”

As you can see there is a galaxy and all chat bug here where the messages typed show blank. This is however not apparent on all chat.

Topic: Time World / Bugs and Glitches

OK i have finally understood this glitch. A while ago now i reported that the game had taken my AP after a raid. (E.g i had 4AP then attacked a player and was left with 1). The game had not stolen my AP. I noticed what actually happens today after closely monitoring my AP. I had 1 AP, after the timer had reached 0 my AP counter recorded that i had 3AP. I then did a PvP attack and was left with 0. Sometimes it seems that the game gives a false amount of AP. This is frustrating especially when you do no know what count your AP was previously on as it seems to magically take 1 for no reason. For anyone else that has had this problem. The game doesn’t take your AP it sometimes gives a false representation of what you actually have making you perceive that it has. :)

Topic: Time World / Out of the frying pan and in to the fire

Originally posted by Vinghiskhan:

How about giving new players some more help and more advantages when they start playing. How about all level 20 buildings on the first planet when they start, more than just one blue hero to begin with. They could start in a massive galaxy, kind of like the phantom galaxy, where all new players are put into for the first week or so that they play. This will enable them to make friends early in the game, and might encourage them to stay. Also, this massive galaxy will have a feature that they cannot be attacked, and that res collect gives 50% more resources. No pillar hitting from this galaxy, and they will get kicked after a week.

Kinda like the 2nd part of this post.. but level 20 buildings won’t allow them to upgrade anything. Secondly the big galaxy for new players is a good idea, however is based on the fact that there will be a multitude of players joining the game. Only this way will social interaction be able to happen. There may only be 4-5 people a week that join the game. It should be 2 weeks or more IMO. Good idea though.

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Originally posted by stalliga888:

Thanks Playmage. Instead of giving me 20 yellow crystals for insane summoner that nobody needs/wants i now get 30. Anybody that is doing insane WoH does not need yellow crystals, scrap these as a prize. This is not a prize it is an insult. Give me a boobyprize instead like 1 credit. That would actually have more worth.

SUPPORT THIS POST!

Topic: Time World / Feedback and Suggestions

Thanks Playmage. Instead of giving me 20 yellow crystals for insane summoner that nobody needs/wants i now get 30. Anybody that is doing insane WoH does not need yellow crystals, scrap these as a prize. This is not a prize it is an insult. Give me a boobyprize instead like 1 credit. That would actually have more worth.

Topic: Time World / Welcome To Time World! Now F*** off!

Nvillian you always rant about the game saying it’s far below standard and poor quality, yet you still play it…..