Recent posts by wargamer1000 on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The Bible as a historical document

Originally posted by niceman555:

It would make no sense if facts were opinions. What you are saying is that “Bill Gates is the owner of Microsoft” is an opinion. Please explain that.

This kind of thinking: ’It’s an opinion, because the true owner of microsoft are the people who work there….’

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / AX:You are now the dictator of a small European country

Of Small European Country…
I’d sit tight, and open trading partnerships in Asia. Although this would entirely depend
on my geographic location. Well, I’d prefer to be located either near Eurasia or to lay beside the Atlantic ocean.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Technical Support / How To Restore Lost Saved Files for Flash/Browser Games

Very nice, I thank you both.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Technical Support / How To Restore Lost Saved Files for Flash/Browser Games

Lately, I just lost my saved file for a game. And I hate having to do it all over again from the start.

So how does one recover lost saved files for games?
Please explain.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Legendary creatures

Are ‘zombies’ part of this?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Solar Panels, Pay off

Originally posted by vikaTae:

You would have to set it up as an experiment, wargamer. A possible concern would be polution from the smoke. If it equals the same intensity as a coal powerplant for the same MW, then it’s not really viable. Chemical preservatives in the wood, and additives to paper consumed, would be a problem there, when doing it in bulk.

You may also have a problem in keeping the panels clean with sizable amounts of smoke. Soot on the panels will rapidly drop their efficiency.

Otherwise the idea is sound.

EDIT: And you delete the post, right before I reply. Typical.

LOL, right before.
So fire mimics the sun?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How will the world end?

Originally posted by vikaTae:

It was Hobo and yourself who were proposing we launch them into space to ‘get rid of them’.

It’s an insane idea, and a total waste of resources.

Until we meet alien invaders, there is no need.
But what I was saying was just we ‘can’ launch nukes to space.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How will the world end?

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Not without putting them on something a whole lot larger than a missile. You’d have to put each warhead, or at most a half-dozen warheads in a capsule atop an Atlas V rocket, and be damn sure of your calculations. We don’t have enough Atlas rockets for our planetary arsenal, and even if we did, firing them out into space, is a recipe for disaster.

If you’re going to do that, wouldn’t it be easier just to disassemble the things whilst you are gathering them, and repurpose the materials?

Right now, there is no use for launching nukes into space.
Designing a space ship which could deliver nukes aren’t so hard. Equally as hard as launching satellites. Yet must be done with more caution.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How will the world end?

A balistic missile does not have sufficient thrust to do that. It doesn’t even have enough thrust to achieve Earth orbit, let alone escape our gravity well. They were never designed with that capability in mind.

Using a ballistic missile? No. Of course it doesn’t, So far. But my point is, we can still launch nukes to other planets without hurting ourselves.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How will the world end?

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Same problem, Hobo. An intercontinental balistic does not have enough thrust to escape this planet’s gravity well. No matter where out there you aim it, it will always return to this planet.

Know how space ships work? Since knowing that it doesn’t have the fuel to keep going on to its destination, it simply ejects it cargo, presumably the satellite. And since space has no intertia, the projectile you launch will keep going on (with the help of small thrusters). Hows else did they send those satellites that far out in our solar system?

Now, instead of satellites, use nuclear warheads.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / How will the world end?

Originally posted by tenco1:

In a few billion years when the Sun goes kablooey.

Yes, this is how the world would die. The naturally good way.

For the other theories;
A nuclear war? Very Unlikely chances. Nations are rather getting more united.
Pollution? As you said, we’d make more & better technologies, which could mean that we’d have had already found alternative ways to deal with trash and wastes.
Man-made terror? Humans have the knowledge and perhaps experience, we’d know well on what to do to avoid/prevent such.

It wouldn’t kill if humans might turn back to cavemen, but at least the specie survives.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / What would you do if you heard a nuke alert

Originally posted by Azolf:

I could use a change of scenery.

I like the way you think.

 
Flag Post

Topic: General Gaming / Scariest Games on Kongregate

No one finds 1916-Der Unbekannte krieg scary?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Are you hairy?

Originally posted by Snap902:

What do you mean by “hairy”?

Hair. Hair all over you.
Those millions of black strands on your head.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Legend of Korra

*Bump

Originally posted by AlextheGreat13:

I had no idea what this “Legend of Korra” thing was, so I did a Google image search and found this:

So I can only conclude that whatever this is, it’s obviously a RIPOFF of Portal 2.

portal 2? What?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The future of the Roman Catholic Church

I worry not if other religions overtake Roman Catholicism.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Legend of Korra

So, hows it for you?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Possibility of another WorldWar

Sure, there are tensions, economic crisis, rebellion, civil unrest etc.
But are they enough to cause another catastrophic international war?
Well, not really immediately right now, but if you were to predict, judging by current situations and issues, will there be a chance of it happening?
Of course there’s the UN, but can they hold-off all kinds of uncertainty?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Free Market / Planned Economy

What is the difference between the two? What exactly are these?
But the most important question would be; which is better?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Sinking the Unsinkable: Destroyers

Originally posted by FlabbyWoofWoof:

Isn’t that the role of submarines?

You referring to torpedoes? Bleh. An even easier target than a missile since its slower.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Sinking the Unsinkable: Destroyers

Originally posted by FlabbyWoofWoof:
Originally posted by wargamer1000:


Question is; how to sink it?

Holes.

Yes, holes. Better yet, is to blow the whole thing up.
But its impossible, because it will just shoot down all incoming projectiles anyway.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Sinking the Unsinkable: Destroyers

The modern-day destroyers, as we know, are very sophisticated,complex and invulnerable!

We do know that due to its defense systems and its detection systems which are beyond comprehension, Nothing can hit it.

Question is; how to sink it?

What possible tactics can you do? What weaponry do you need?

 
Flag Post

Topic: General Gaming / Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances

For those who have tried this game, I would like to know your opinions about this game.

It is a browser game by EA released last march and is a ‘play4free’
I’ve seen several criticism about this game, but I would like to hear from you.

Try the game! If you like.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism/Socialism

The difference between communism and socialism;

Socialism is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the economy works. Democracy is liberal. More people (preferably everyone) have some say in how the government works. “Democracy,” said Marx, “is the road to socialism.” He was wrong about how economics and politics interact, but he did see their similar underpinnings.

Communism is conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just the Party Secretary) have any say in how the economy works. Republicans are conservative. Fewer and fewer people (preferably just people controlling the Party figurehead) have any say in how the government works. The conservatives in the US are in the same position as the communists in the 30s, and for the same reason: Their revolutions failed spectacularly but they refuse to admit what went wrong.

A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are “socialist” in the same way that Republicans are “compassionate conservatives”. That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing.

Socialism is the idea that the working class, the class that produces the profits, the wealth, the cars, houses, planes, steel, should take over and run things collectively, democratically, for the benefit of the majority (who also “just happen” to be workers too).

Communism is the idea that society should not have classes – exploiters and exploited, oppressors and oppressed, and so on. "

In a way, communism is an extreme form of socialism.
A Comparison between the two

Have your say.
Im just most concerned about china

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate Multiplayer Games / [Battalion: Arena] Thop Wars: Combat, the game inspired on Battalion Arena being made by Thop Team!

Originally posted by Thopson1m:
Originally posted by tingmarco4:

i wanted to join beta. because i miss battalion arena and battalion level editor

Remembering that you just need to create an account on Thop Team Official Forum to join the community, post comment there with your suggestions and also to keep informed about how New! Battalion Arena development is! ^^

Yep, link isn’t working.