Recent posts by djirtsdew on Kongregate

Topic: Tyrant / Automatic deck optimization

Originally posted by jt4703:

I have another feature request. I’d like the ability to optimize a deck and then blacklist the cards and amounts in the optimized deck so recursive runs of optimizer doesn’t use the cards from that deck. This would make it possible to build the best deck for mission/quest/raid and keep that deck built and use different cards to aim for another mission/quest/raid. I’d also like the ability to save a blacklist so I can load it easily.

What you want is already possible.
You can create multiple card filters, say one with all cards you want to use. You create your first deck.
Than you create a second filter, with all the cards from the first deck. Copy-paste them from your original filter, subtract the number of times a card is used from the number of times it was in the orig filter.
Call the new filter “blacklist.txt” or something.

Now if you use tyrant_optimize you use both filters e.g. tyrant_optimize your_deck_hash “Mission 123” -o=filter_file.txt -o=blacklist.txt climb 10000

It will first load the first filter, then overwrite the number of times you have a card with the numbers in the blacklist. So putting a (0) behind a card in the blacklist will mean that the optimizer will not try to replace another card by that card anymore.

So this blacklist file in this case is a relatively short file, with at most 11 lines after the first optimization. If you want to do this a number of times in a row, it might get longer, and you need to keep subtracting all cards you add in multiple decks to get the right blacklist…

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

Oh, regarding the problem I encountered. It seems to have auto-solved itself, already a few days ago.
I’m still using the same version of Chrome, so nothing should have changed, but clearly something did change.

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

Originally posted by spkatsi:

Originally posted by djirtsdew:

I’m unable to submit any more simulations.

ErrorCode: 1
Error: Invalid accessToken

(4) Retrying in 5 minutes… (Or you can refresh this page manually.)

As far as I can see there’s nothing wrong with my accessToken.

Possibly you clicked on a link with an older version of sim? If so open new window and edit the url to &version=v1.171 or just try entering from http://haileon.com/SimTyrantSubmit

I had already tried those, just tried them again, and it’s still not working…

But I just tried something else, and it is working in Internet Explorer, instead of Google Chrome Version 26.0.1410.64 m. I’m wondering why this could be browser related…

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

I’m unable to submit any more simulations.

ErrorCode: 1
Error: Invalid accessToken

(4) Retrying in 5 minutes… (Or you can refresh this page manually.)

As far as I can see there’s nothing wrong with my accessToken.

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Originally posted by Dingesman:

Xeno walker. 23h left

http://www.kongregate.com/games/synapticon/tyrant?kv_joinraid=9688619

Added on the fansite:

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

Originally posted by Moraku:

Originally posted by djirtsdew:

I’m getting identical problems in the beta and non-beta versions of the simulator. Has the old version been changed too?

In Firefox: It does the first few simulations, then stops, and after a few seconds I get the following popup from the browser:

A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.
Script: http://www.haileon.com/SimTyrantJS?deck1=QVDA+nHVIZgj&mission=267&sims=100000&autostart=1:4232

In Chrome: It does the first few simulations, then stops, and continues using the CPU without anything noticable happening. If I said I wanted to use more cores, it uses them (according to the CPU usage in the task manager).

oh, i thought i was just fixing some debug stuff… ok, undid that thing with immobilize. should work again now.

It’s working again now.
I did some quick tests on a quad-core laptop
(QVDA+nHVIZgj vs. Mission 183, as sss1 posted on the previous page, but with only 10k sims):

Firefox 19.0.2:
single-core (old version): 20.527 seconds (487.2 simulations per second)
dual-core: 15.192 seconds (658.2 simulations per second)
quad-core: 12.450 seconds (803.2 simulations per second)

Google Chrome 25.0.1364.172 m:
single-core (old version): 7.598 seconds (1316.1 simulations per second)
dual-core: 5.126 seconds (1950.8 simulations per second)
quad-core: 4.946 seconds (2021.8 simulations per second)

It seems like the first second nothing is happening in Google Chrome, after that it is ultra-fast compared to Firefox. Dual core it says around 2700-2800 simulations/second while it is running. I’m not sure what’s causing this initial delay, but it is a shame to only do 10k simulations if there is a full second offset in the times.
So 100k simulations:

single-core (old version): 68.681 seconds (1456.0 simulations per second)
dual-core: 36.309 seconds (2754.1 simulations per second)
quad-core: 30.020 seconds (3331.1 simulations per second)

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

I’m getting identical problems in the beta and non-beta versions of the simulator. Has the old version been changed too?

In Firefox: It does the first few simulations, then stops, and after a few seconds I get the following popup from the browser:

A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script will complete.
Script: http://www.haileon.com/SimTyrantJS?deck1=QVDA+nHVIZgj&mission=267&sims=100000&autostart=1:4232

In Chrome: It does the first few simulations, then stops, and continues using the CPU without anything noticable happening. If I said I wanted to use more cores, it uses them (according to the CPU usage in the task manager).

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Mortanux’s Oluth:

Raindancej’s Oluth:

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Topic: Tyrant / [To Devs]Event messup.

We should at the very least get the time to use our points…

Topic: Tyrant / SimTyrant - The simulator that runs from your browser!

JavaScript error:
ReferenceError: faction is not defined
on line 3304
for http://haileon.com/SimTyrantJS?deck1=P5CPNgBoAoC6CPvnCP&ordered=1&quest=14&sims=10000
Browser CodeName: Mozilla
Browser Name: Netscape
Browser Version: 5.0 (Windows)
Cookies Enabled: true
Platform: Win32
User-agent header: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0
SimTyrant version: v1.124
Deck hash: P5CPNgBoAoC6CPvnCP
Ordered: Yes
Quest ID: 14

It seems related to Hubart’s “repair 1” ability.

Topic: Tyrant / End of the world???

Than Tyrant wouldn’t be a CCG anymore but an “everyone’s got all cards” game.

Topic: Legacy of a Thousand Suns / Cerebral Destroyer 11/16

Originally posted by clark86:

Originally posted by RPEtiger:

The spread on the WR this round is far too uneven. While rookie friendly, many of the later leaps are far too large.
I would suggest to stair it
1, 100k, 250k, 500k, 1m,
2m, 3m, 4m, 6m, 8m,
10m, 15m, 20m, 25m, 35m,
50m, 75m, 100m, 150m, 200m,
300m, 400m, 500m, 650m, 800m,
1b, 1.5b, 2.5b, 5b, 10b

that’s alot of stairs lol..

Same number as in the description above…

But I guess the huge gap between 2b and 10b in the current system brings some extra excitement to the players who might get to 10b. If they get there they get a huge extra reward. If the steps are spread out more evenly, so should the rewards be. Which means that some of the excitement gets lost.