insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] Consortium call
mfronek – One of the more respected players among the top factions. Objective thinking.
?? – Another respected player among top factions (from an opposing top tier faction)
Baulde – on Fansite the #1 ranked tournament player. Having someone who understands and utilizes tyrants cardbase would be ideal for a consortium
hunterhogan – Good deck builder, awesome text walls. Not afraid to have conflicting opinions
pip – No explanation needed
Moraku – simulator, deck building, objective thinking
?? – A heavy FB tyrant player
Last but not least, and I’m not trolling:
0hio – I say his name because having a player who has a knack for finding exploits would be good for all of tyrant IF and its a big IF, he joined the consortium for quality assurance purposes. I know, it’s like making a deal with the devil., and the cons may outweigh the pros.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] Universal Shard proposal
Love the universal shard. I understand your point on making a cap, but 20 is too low. I suggest making it 25 or 35. Sometimes i prefer buying 2 or more packs at a time instead of crafting a pack as soon as it becomes available. Having the last digit in the cap be a 5 allows the players to obtain the amount needed for multiple packs without losing any shards for hitting the cap.
i.e. I have 19 shards and do the daily quest and obtain 1 shard because the cap was 20, when i should have recieved 3 shards, etc..
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] 11/16/2012 Upcoming Update
Yay for no longer having to switch BoD’s and Acropolis’s among decks.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Devs] Conquest Alliancing
Originally posted by Philosopher:
Originally posted by kevinexmx:
<blockquoteI am not complaining about the war happening, i am complaining how we dont have a chance to fight back. If the alliance bulldozers through all enemies like that, it WILL be stagnant.
You have a chance to fight back, and you are fighting back. The reason you are in danger is because you were aggressive and got yourself in a poor strategic situation.
My faction has been sitting on 31 tiles. I have no interest in more tiles, even now. I expect to have 31 tiles at the end of the war. I just did this to help allies when asked.
You guys were conquering 45+ tiles and were allied with an aggressive faction. The more aggressive you are, the more careful you need to be about not tangling with factions that have allies. I have nothing against aggression, but it is a riskier strategy. It’s not surprising that eventually aggression put you in danger of losing a war.
Perfectly stated. Before the war broke, between Evo and Mongers, they had combined 63 tiles. Enough for both factions to claim max tokens. Instead of balancing tiles among themselves, they attacked an alliance, and from my understanding was warned not to create an unbalance. Instead of doing that, Evo became aggressive and continued attacking, seemingly to poke the bear afterwards getting mauled.
Now i read the Original Post as a big thread about whining, when THEY (Evocati/Warmongers) WERE THE ONES THAT STARTED THIS. They got aggressive and kept collecting more tiles than was needed.
Disclaimer, if this isn’t 100% accurate in the intentions, well that’s war propaganda for you
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Poll] Will DEV give us 25WB for server downtime?
Actually because of all the people whose raids failed because of the outage, everyone should be given 5 beacons as a minimum.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Post Active Raid Links Here
 
The above image automatically updates every 4 minutes. How to add your own raid-tracking image!
Xeno Walker #17808
Join this raid (get link)
See raid details on fansite
See suggested decks
Still a good raid to join… It was created minutes prior to tyrant going down for several hours.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Crafting/Arena Update now live.
Originally posted by DaWayne33:
Originally posted by cfjem:
What happened to this?
- We will consider adding cross-feature drops at a lower drop rate. For example, Raid tokens can drop from missions, but not quite as frequently, so you aren’t forced to play features you don’t want to
Seriously? This was one of two of the changes you listed in the other thread that, if not implemented horribly, would have been a significant improvement. Without it, you haven’t fixed the main issue many long-time players voiced: that you are forcing players to redo parts of the game that they do not enjoy after having already completed them.
That is meant for a future update after players have had a chance to play the current system. It is something we are considering but not yet a guarantee.
Well thanks for the game while it lasted. After finishing all 16 raids at max honor, I refuse to go back to doing the raids. I’ve already left my top 10 faction and wont be coming back. At least you enjoyed my warbonding while it lasted.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
Looks like i stumped the noobs. This game would be fun if everyone played by the rules….
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
@ skolu Violates general rule #10…come again.
10) Cards may not appear twice on the same page unless there is no other possible counter.
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
Counter To Delphan:
Rule 86 – Card must have no defensive skills or combat modifiers
Is possible to be defeated… w/o using aquabat or Unstable Dynamo
Not ALL counters have been played
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
Rule 86 – Card must have no defensive skills, and no combat modifiers
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
Originally posted by Shadowhopeful:
Originally posted by insta1234:
@shadowhopeful nice,…sorry your not creative enough to beat it with using only two cards, as it can be done…
Not breaking any rules, am I?
>.>
Not now :)
|
|
|
|
insta1234
53 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Advanced counter cards game (squabble edition)
@shadowhopeful nice,…sorry your not creative enough to beat it with using only two cards, as it can be done…
|
