Recent posts by going2killu on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / What Kongregate Needs

I agree. If that’s asking too much, then alternatively, if the site even stored a bit more detailed data about our progress in certain games, we wouldn’t have to start from scratch on certain games every time we lost our cookies.

 
Flag Post

Topic: General Gaming / Mission in Space: The Lost Colony strategy guide.

I sent taylor and farro to the top, and the rest down. Just rush like hell with farro and taylor, and make sure you have sentinel for farro.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Impossible badges 2011

So, I was just browsing around, seeing if I could find any good explanation for the ridiculous lack of impossible badges over the past two years, and, essentially, I can’t… There’s NO WAY impossible badges are as incredibly difficult to come by as the rate at which they are made would suggest.

Seriously, I was just looking at the impossible badges, and Tower of Greed’s impossible badge is the 6th most recent impossible badge on the whole site… I mean, holy crap, I can barely even remember that badge anymore… that was about 2 years ago!

I used to enjoy this site because it offered a good challenge in the form of impossible badges, but anymore, the only games with impossible badges left for me to get are either shooters (which I suck at) or annoying in general… What happened to this site? :/

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Long-Distance Relationship

It feels as though your right eye is gazing into my very soul.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Ivory Tower

Thank you.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Ivory Tower

Mods are never in the room while I am, so I can’t complain to them.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Ivory Tower

Severe lack of mods in Ivory Tower is frustrating at times. Any thoughts?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is there any point in voting for third party candidates with no chance of winning?

Originally posted by Procyonpi:
Originally posted by Spaghedeity:
Our current system has lots of flaws

So then… WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO PERPETUATE THESE FLAWS BY REPEATING THE RHETORIC THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE OF THE BIGGEST?

I’m not trying to perpetuate the flaws, I’m saying that voting for a third party candidate with no chance of winning won’t fix them. I’m not saying “third parties are stupid.” I’m saying “given the way our system is currently structured, a vote for a third party is effectively a vote for nobody in almost all races.” I would fully support implementation of IRV.

So, what you mean to say is, “our system does not allow for third party candidates to compete with other more major candidates, and therefore we should keep it that way”

Good call. :/

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is there any point in voting for third party candidates with no chance of winning?

Well, it’s too bad DarkBaron’s method of voting has nearly no impact on the whole. Politicians advertise in the way they do because it yields the most votes, or at least that is the thought behind the advertisements. If a few people want to vote against them out of spite for having annoying advertisements, then so be it. I doubt they care, and if they do, they shouldn’t. For every vote lost out of spite, they probably gain at least 100 anyways. People are easy to convince.

Additionally, DarkBaron’s method of voting is better than that of those voters who are too dumb to realize when they are being drilled with propagandist nonsense through stupid advertisements.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Your political affiliation

The question does not ask if you want your government to topple enemy regimes. Regardless of your position on that issue, you must take everything in the question into account to make an accurate judgement. If you do not believe that toppling enemy regimes to spread democracy would make the world a safer place, then you click disagree… It is pretty simple.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Your political affiliation

Most of those questions had pretty obvious answers, I’d say.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

Spaghedeity would probably like you to think so. Whether you actually do is your own decision.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

Enlighten us, Darkruler. Please.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

I am shocked by the degree to which some of you people do not understand this. Let me break it down. There has only been one time that an admin has posted a comment on the forums after 4 years of forum inactivity. That is right. ONE TIME. EVER. Thus, there is only one user who can rightfully claim to be the op for the thread on which said comment took place. That user is Spaghedeity. If you do not understand this, then perhaps you should go back and count all of your misreadings throughout this thread.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

jvoorhis joined October 19th of 2006. That’s nearly four years. Nice try though. And sellyme, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Go read more books.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

Wow, some people… This thread was not designed to be a competition. If it had been, Spaghedeity would win, because no one else has been the op for an admin’s first post in four years.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / FILLER 2 AGAIN???

After spending some time scrounging through the forums (because I have been up all night, and have nothing better to do), I have found what 2032 was probably referring to here.

Somehow, 2032 considers his side-comment better than Spaghedeity’s post, which has actually produced some discussion.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Lesser Users, Eat Your Hearts Out!

Claps in applause

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Fellatio for Breast Cancer?

[link removed]

Any thoughts?

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Senate Republicans block repeal of 'Don't ask don't tell'. The shameful discrimination continues.

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Senate Republicans block repeal of 'Don't ask don't tell'. The shameful discrimination continues.

Brits >.>

No consulted expert anywhere in the world concluded that lifting the ban on openly gay service caused an overall decline in the military.

Obviously, that statement is false when you replace “consulted expert” with “expert.”

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Senate Republicans block repeal of 'Don't ask don't tell'. The shameful discrimination continues.

That’s a REALLY high percentage! Jeez!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Senate Republicans block repeal of 'Don't ask don't tell'. The shameful discrimination continues.

I can’t be arsed

here

If you wanted something more reputable, either find it yourself or get over it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Senate Republicans block repeal of 'Don't ask don't tell'. The shameful discrimination continues.

The title doesn’t discriminate against anyone. It mentions that Republicans blocked a measure, and states that discrimination continues. Please don’t make things up.

“The shameful discrimination continues”

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Does the Moon Really Exist?

I am undecided on this issue. I mean, people say all the time that it’s probably a big spotlight or something, but I just can’t make up my mind. What do you all think? Does it exist or what?