Recent posts by Zachary_Greene on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / what happend to nPlay?

Game is ded
Why host?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / You get raided by the SWAT

Originally posted by Pokerpo:

id fuck my sister

You aren’t a beta white pony-child.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Health & Fitness

Originally posted by Pokerpo:
oh, then stay a while

Thanks m8, it worked.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Who is better, Hades or Satan?

I have to support lord Satan on this one, for he possesses my soul, as well as my heart.

 

Topic: Off-topic / Mme[Bunneh] is a [bunbun :>>>]

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Should we teach Genesis in science classes?

Or you can just dedicate a year or semester to religion and go into the important parts or books of each religion in history class or something, or in an elective class.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / SHOULD vaccines be required for schools?

If the school wishes to have it as such, yes, however, school shouldn’t be required.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
What one person considers clean for them self can be filthy as hell for the next person’s evaluation.>

This same issue applies with maids.
Once again, marks for sub-par cleaning, too many marks means you’re banned from non-maid hotels.

Regardless, as I said, there would be standard taught in schools to show everyone exactly what would be required.


Originally posted by vikaTae:
Belief that there must be is a common public misconception, nothing more.

Yes, however, people seem to feel happier and better when interacting with other humans, rather than robots.
While a robot can do almost if not every service job, people will usually prefer a person to do them.
Just as a robot can teach your children, or they can do so by their self, people will always, for now that is, feel more comfortable with a human and feel like they’re getting more from a human than a robot.
One day that may change, but it’s likely a very long time from now, as robots aren’t even in most peoples daily lives, or at least ones that interact with them actively.

If they don’t have the aplitude for teaching then they shouldn’t be made to do it. There are enough bad teachers as it is, without adding more.

Yes, but many of the lower-class workers of today could easily do that, but simply don’t have the degree, or don’t know how to get into the field, or are striving for some ridiculous job in sports.
There’s always going to be certain people who do worthless jobs, assuming we don’t purge people or have people not work at all, however, we should try to phase those jobs out as much as possible.


Really to counter-act the surplus in goods you should receive from no one profiting in your country, you will not need everyone to be working, but because work is almost needed at this point for humans to stay sane, you must provide work.
This works perfectly with what I have mentioned previously, I believe last time I posted in this thread, regarding people only working 1/3 to 1/2 their normal job times, and therefore having much more free-time, be it for family, for gaming, or for learning.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by Kasic:
While that would probably only apply to extremely young children, that right there is why there’s that whole idea of ability to consent. Way back near the start of this thread I explained to Helltank the whole power dichotomy thing.

From what I have heard and seen, pedos don’t want to, and don’t try to abuse such a dynamic.
If someone doesn’t abuse such a dynamic, what’s the issue with children even consenting to sex?
Obviously, that would be an extremely hard case to make be, seeing as I consider even saying anything positive about an activity to be coercive to some degree, which would void consent in such a situation(?), but would it not be possible?

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
isn’t “getting off” by being around them.

Typically people refer to “getting off” as a sexual thing, so assuming you do, once again, you seem to not believe pedos can in fact love, as they can also genuinely enjoy being around children.
Aside from sexually, which is ridiculous, it still suggests there is something wrong with a pedo being happy, feeling good about their self, or having fun with a child. What is wrong with “getting off” emotionally if everyone involved is just smiles?

That has the potential to be soooooo wrong on several levels.

Wrong morally, to you, yes.
Logically, no.

It’s the same reason why I am not myself extremely against physical contact, sexual or otherwise, with a child, despite not being for it, sexually that is.
The majority of the damage kids suffer from “sexual abuse” results from society to be quite honest.
All the social conditioning and feels people force on them eventually break them and make them feel dirty, used, abused, unloved, etc, when in reality they are none of those things, and never were, at least because of their incident or “abuser.”

I won’t bother to show you just how idiotically wrong that is.

But (s)he’s right, it’s a double standard you have.

Originally posted by vikaTae:
With that context in mind, I would recommend you be a little more careful and much more circumspect before you start accusing other forum users of being pedophiles.

I honestly don’t care unless someone starts slandering my name among my family or calls the police in on me, seeing as both of those is just a big hassle that I’ll have to deal with.
Yay, now I have to explain to my family, especially the ones with kids, how certain things are, and remind them how good I treat their kids, so even if was true, following my logic at least, you shouldn’t care nor worry.
Yay, now I have to not touch the internet for a few weeks while they try to find evidence on my computer, and they flip my house, probably destroying many things, just to find nothing and spread lies to my family.

In my opinion if you hate someone for being a pedo, your opinion doesn’t matter, so if he hated (or didn’t trust) me for defending them, and thereby apparently being one, so be it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by Kasic:
(let’s be honest, you’re probably only talking about men here)

Actually, I’m not, but I haven’t really said otherwise.
The statistics about the vast majority being men is a joke, while the slight majority may be men, at least biologically, it’s not in any regards a vast majority. It’s like saying the vast majority of Scots voted no.

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Does a known pedo have a certificate that says: I’m a pedo but a CERTIFIED non-raping one; but I don’t necessarily see it as rape if the child gives consent? However I still wouldn’t risk harming the child indirectly or otherwise even if they did, as it’s simply not worth it.

No, however you should easily be drawn to such a conclusion if you speak to the average pedo.

What you seem to not understand is that pedos also genuinely love their attraction as a romantic partner, however, they also find them cute and child-like, because, well, they are, so they also love them paternal-like, and because of this, from what I see, it would be basically impossible for one of them to rape a child as long as they aren’t literally insane.
This combined with the general characteristics and ideology of most pedos, I honestly can come to the conclusion that they’re speaking the truth, and that I can trust them completely with my child, be it with me, with other kids, by their self in public, by their self in my house or his house, or alone giving my child a bath or a quick diaper change.
You seem to think the majority of what pedos feel is sexual as well, as well as that they don’t feel parental to children, but everything I have learned and see suggests otherwise.

But, that said, I’m not at all comfortable w/ “offering up” my child as some form of therapy for some pedo working his way through “controlling” his penchant for lust-0-children.

So what you’re saying, is that you ARE NOT “in complete agreement w/ you & Zachary,” correct?
You still seem to fall back that they’re either all rapists, potential rapists, or are generally dangerous.

Are you constantly working on controlling your “lust,” are you constantly needing to control yourself?
Because if so, you need help, not them.
Did you need to control yourself when you were FIRST around someone you love alone, or otherwise, or did you understand your situation and how it wasn’t exactly how you wanted it, and because of that, it made it not only distant and non-desired, but also unreasonable?

I am fully (not as a child) in charge of my actions. Promise of a candy bar isn’t going to sway me.

Thank you for proving my suspicions, once again, and making yourself contradict yourself AGAIN.

am going to be very uncomfortable about what is/MIGHT be going on in his head.

See the above.
You’re simply discriminating for no reason other than some irrational hatred, just like people did to gays at one time.

The only way I can see myself interacting w/ a pedo is in a therapy situation for him/them if there were to somehow be some benefit for me being there.

Because your child would not enjoy having a friend in their life that cares about them, that plays with them, and that pays attention to them?
You’d probably be able to get a free babysitter that actually teaches and loves your child in exchange for what you call “therapy.”

Kasic, would YOU allow a pedo friend to bounce your 3 y.o. on his (or her) lap

Would you allow the gay fella in the shower grab you and rub his dick on your ass?
Would you NOT allow a friendly pedo to sit on the carpet and play games with your baby? Would you beat them with a rusty pipe if your child climbs up and sits on their lap or next to them while watching tv?

At what level of physical contact would ya begin to have concerns?

When (s)he crosses a line and does something sexual to a child.
(S)he can rub my daughters vulva while changing her, but (s)he cannot lick her, or masturbate her.
It’s the same situation as a male doctor and a female patient during a physical. You may find them beautiful, but not only do you not NEED to be sexual, you probably aren’t thinking about it, and are acting strictly professionally.

When I help babysit my cousins, often times, for example, the year and three months one, Lily, will try to crawl over me, or will sit on me, or I will carry her, and something may touch down there, and it’s nothing sexual to me.
Kids just do things sometimes, and if the poor pedo-friend I allowed around my daughter or son suddenly had him/her sit in their lap, that’s not their fault, and that’s probably not sexual to them.
People like you who throw out these accusations, even if someone would be a known pedo, is what terrifies a lot of men. They don’t want children to sit near them, or sit on them because they feel like people will judge them and think of dirty things.

You seem believe that physical contact of some kind means it is sexual or not, but really that’s just not the case.
What the person is thinking, feeling, and their intent is what makes something sexual.
This is part of why nudism isn’t about sexual things.


EDIT: Just realized I did mess up since I walked away for a bit.

(S)he can rub my daughters

I was meaning with a wipe, or something of such, y’know, for cleaning purposes, or something of such, just in case that wasn’t clear.
Although the whole no masturbating bit should have covered this anyhow.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
But, it’s not there in an effort to help promote “feely-good” about pedophilia. It is there for a different kind of help.

There’s sites for that actually, such as Girls-chat.
Personally, I am not fond of the little I know about Ethan myself, or his group VP, simply because of how the group (seems to) operate(s) and seems to try to harass and coerce ALL pedos to join their site/ideology.

While I don’t agree with Girlschat’s views completely, what I have seen is that they don’t go around brutalizing people who have a different view from them.
I just can’t back up a group, even if it has “good” views on paper, in general, if they will attack people who are pro-contact, but refuse contact, or people who deny contact being harmful, but are none the less anti-contact. If they aren’t planning on, and will never be doing anything to a child, and understand it would hurt the child, there’s no reason to try to change their opinion, especially when if you look at it, if you believe any contact (sexually) with the ones you find attractive is inherently bad and evil, would you not be more inclined, or simply indefinitely hate yourself, and think you are wrong and evil?
Basically, from what I have heard and seen, that group promotes self-hate, alongside their “good” views.
If not for the way they seem to act, I would probably if not prefer them.

Have you not heard of pedo priests, Boy Scout leaders, Sunday school teachers, etc.?

Yes, and I excuse many of them as not even being pedos because the way they treat the children and the power they’re in. It makes me doubt their desires, and if they even find children attractive in any way.
At least a couple of the ones I’m friends with, or know, work in elementary schools or in child-care though, and I have no problem with it because I don’t cling onto this irrational fear that pedos can’t control their self and are rape-machines. They enjoy being around children and caring for them, so would it not make sense to seek a job in such a field? It’s enjoyable, it pays your bills, and it makes you happy. What else is there to ask for?

And to what you said right after what I quoted, personally, I would trust these people with my life.
I see no reason why you wouldn’t.
You can’t even seem to trust them around them around others, and you claim not alone at all as of now, and if that’s not irrational discrimination, I don’t know what is. I’d go so far to trust them alone with my child naked, in the sense of a bath or a diaper changing. I can’t really think of any other situations where they would be, normally, but I see now reason not to.
If you see a naked woman are you going to do things to them that will likely hurt them in one way or another, as well as likely get you thrown in jail, and your life completely destroyed, as well as you being torn away from the person, the woman, you loved hanging around so much?

Seeking help

Exactly what help?
I’m sure you wouldn’t suggest the same help for a gay man or woman, would you?

I’ve never met someone who said that who actually had a reasonable argument regarding this, and believe people say this and try to convince pedos just because they know their life would be destroyed if they spoke about it publicly, or to a therapist who would then report them.

Being Gay doesn’t involve sexual activity that involves children….CHILDREN. Are you able to understand CHILDREN?

Being a pedo doesn’t “involve sexual activity that involves children…(yes)CHILDREN.”

Regardless, once again, emotional appeal.
I understand children, and the word, and who they are, and how they act and feel.

I guess the (broader than economics) concept of supply & demand is something you aren’t able to apply to child porn, either.
If there isn’t a demand for it, the supply won’t be there either.

You do realize how child pornography, and generally all pornography works, right?

If I make a cookie, and you buy it, or I give it to you, it is gone. I need to make some more.
If I take a picture of a beautiful tree and share it with you, or you buy it, can I not stop possess it, or give it away some more?

The supply for child pornography exists for more than a lifetime, and if no one ever makes any more, you can jerk off every day, multiple times, to CP and never see the same video or picture/set.

So, tell me, how is the demand for child porn going to be met if the supply doesn’t exist?

By the ample amount that already exists.
If you plant a plant, the supply of food from it should never run out, as it will continue reproducing and making more of it’s self, or continue growing.

Regardless, the way you speak of supply and demand suggests, like in capitalism, someone profits off it.
This is simply not true, as with all/most porn, you can find imageboards or porn sites with thousands of exactly what you’re looking for. Is motherless making loads off porn? Well, they are off ads, but the porn? No, they simply host it, and people contribute for free to share with their lads.

There isn’t any “child porn industry” like you, and most normies speak of, people just make things to share with their lads, or for their self later. No one is going to buy a video and risking jail, being scammed, being killed, or generally having their life destroyed in one way or another, especially when there are free choices.
If you wanted this dreamland to get rid of said industry, would not legalizing aid it? It would make people go from legally downloading and viewing to buying and risking all the things of before, wouldn’t it?

Honestly, where does your logic, if I could call it that, come from?

Believe me, any pedos that go to nudist resorts are soon ferreted out.
It takes a very sly pedo to fool us.

Since you’re speaking of nudist pictures, there’s no need for pedos to do that, nudists do.
Haven’t you heard of a site called purenudism, or ANY of the nudists sites online?
Hell, parents throw videos of babies and toddlers naked in the bath or various things on youtube all the time at that.
It’s as if you’ve never left Kongregate and seen people speak of things that aren’t politically correct or acceptable to the majority. People mention these sites and sources CONSTANTLY on places even as tame and popular as 4chan, more than daily.

Regarding it taking a sly pedo, it really shows how deluded you are.
I know pedos from my real life experiences too, that have told me, or have showed me explicitly through their actions. Many.
People like you seem to think pedos are these fat hairy old men who don’t know anything about the world, but they aren’t. They’re usually the opposite of that, from what I believe to be compensation.

I’d bet my life that you know at least one pedo, but you’re either too stupid to see it, or (s)he’s too good at hiding it.
The stereotype of pedos, that you obviously believe, is a lie, a complete lie at that.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Why not get rid of maid service at a hotel/motel?
The ppl who stay there for a day or two and make their own bed and clean their own toilet…..or NOT.

Why not?
Can you not have hotels that are, obviously, state-run, that have different qualities?
A cheap one with maid service costs .2 income, one without with only decent quality is .1, a fancy one is .3 without, .45 with…I see no reason to force maid service on someone who doesn’t want it, and can do just as good of a job.
Assuming you teach how to make a bead properly in schools, the individuals should be able to make the bed for the next fella.

Sure, you can claim people can abuse this system by doing a shit job, but if this happened, they would receive a mark on their record, would be explained why they were given it, and if they got more than a handful, especially in a row, they would be banned from no-maid service hotels.
Simple.

Regarding the toilet, you can say the same, or, really, you can easily have a bot to clean that for cheap, that is part of the toilet.
They exist.

Originally posted by vikaTae:
If the communistic society guarantees you a job as a basic human right, then you may not get a say what that job is. If your skills don’t reflect anything there is an opening for higher up the scale, then dishwasher is what you get.

Yes, however, in general you can always throw more people into the education sector, child care sector, research sectors, and production sector for selling abroad.
If you can’t do such a job, there’s still no need for a dishwasher.
However, a man or woman at the counter to take your order, or to check you out at the grocery store, some people enjoy that. I really don’t care for it personally, however, some people do. You can easily have automatic and non-automatic stores, or sections.

Can you honestly tell me with a straight face that a dishwasher wouldn’t have a better job-quality teaching for example, and that they would not induce a better situation for your country from their work?
A robot misses a genuine human touch, that is in fact beneficial in regards to child care, or education, and even in research simply because you do not have rational limitations, and irrational things can lead to rational things, that seem ridiculous initially. As does a grocery or food-order person.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / VOTE YES F/-\GS

God how I hope there’s another Ireland-tier uprising.
Fuck the UK.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / aperrently we're trying to secede

>tfw Texas will never secede
If America didn’t make it illegal and wouldn’t invade us, we’d fucking do it.
People usually don’t speak of being American here from what I see, but rather being a Texan.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Crying babies are hilarious.

>tfw a baby has never cried when with you
>tfw perfect

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / If you are a world-class sniper, would you prefer to shoot girls with long or short hairdos?

Originally posted by tHErofLwaffLe:

I like girls with long hair, so short haired girls.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

I’m wanting to know how he is going to manage that when he is TOTALLY against it being made & distributed.

There is a conflict in his positions….in his ideology.

Why is it wrong to believe it’s bad or harmful to have ____ in your possession while it is wrong to distribute it or create it?
If you have a dangerous animal in your possession, and it’s secure, you only risk harming yourself, such as if you viewed rape-CP, you would harm yourself regardless of your beliefs and desires.
But if you breed the animal, and as a result have to feed them a lot, is it not harming others? This is the same as when CP is made of a child. It elevates child-sex, which I believe to not be inherently harmful within it’s self, to another level, giving an even higher risk of it turning into a severely negative thing.
Now if you spread the animals you bred, or someone else did into the environment, you can hurt the environment near you if they’re incompatible. This is the same as hurting a child further as their image is distributed, and they feel more used and dirty, not to mention possibly hurting people who view it on purpose or on accident. Would you not have your day ruined by scrolling down this topic and seeing a little toddler girl being raped? I would.

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Then, why not make the possession of it illegal also?

Because it results right back into the situation vika pointed out to you, that you can be charged with a crime because someone else’s carelessness.
If the image thijser posted WAS in fact a 4year old’s pussy, you could potentially go to jail and be a registered sex offender for the rest of your life, and generally have your life ruined.
Is this fair?

Besides, possession harms no one aside from the one who possesses it.
The only reason to support it being illegal is so you can have another big-government scheme to snag people they don’t like and you dislike for beings pedos, or having “icky” views about them.

Originally posted by vikaTae:
The cut-off point for sex with a minor exists for the same reason; it’s nothing to do with how developed their genetalia are, and everything to do with an average midpoint for the point in the process when their brains are likely developed enough to truly understand the abstract ramifications of what they are doing – the ability to legally give informed consent.

While I disagree with why it’s there because of the blind hate I see in most of society, rather than genuine concern, but to me, after multiple years of observing and discussing things like this, while I agree kids think differently, and act differently, I still think that the stress people put on informed consent causes most of the harm to the children.
Not to say it’s right to have sex with kids even though they don’t understand, at least like adults do, especially not in general.
To wrap back up though, I agree with the rest that you said in general on this page at least, aside from what I specifically mentioned.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Legal to do what?

To be shown in porn, or rather, to have porn of such ages, all ages.
Be it a baby, a toddler, a child, a teenager, an adult, or an elder.

Give me some examples of what a 3 y.o. would be doing that is sexy?
Just be naked?
Engaging in sexual activity.

It’s irrelevant.
If they’re just naked in the tub, spread on the carpet, or engaged in some sort of sexual-sexual activity, it doesn’t matter, and it is not relevant to what I said.

If porn is legal for ANY age, what is to keep someone from “going there”?

By this you mean becoming a porn star?
Probably what I said, in this situation, it being illegal to produce.

Then, if it makes no difference if the “parts” are there or not, what is the point of showing them?
Aha, got ya!

You what?
Just because most people find developed “parts” attractive doesn’t mean others don’t.
That’s the best I can do, seeing as I really don’t even understand what you’re suggesting/saying.

And, what the hell does an average age of the world population have to do w/ children being “sexually” naked?

I was referring to the average AoC, and it isn’t.
I honestly don’t get where you’re getting these things from, or have they’re relevant, especially to the rest of the sentence. What’s your point?

Yes, that arbitrary line is called decency

Appeal to emotion/cultural values.

The average teen is illegal here in the states. 18 y.o. isn’t the average. What does MILF have to do w/ child porn? Do you even know what MILF porn is?

You what?
I was saying how there is no reason to ban one over the other, be it child porn, teenage porn, legal ‘teen’ porn, or milf porn.
I used quotations around “teen” for a reason, because what the industry says is teen is not, or is just barely teen.

If something can’t be “made” and passed around, how in hell is anyone going to have it?
Tell me again, how do these ppl have child porn in their possession?

By downloading it, viewing it, or being given it physically by some poor chump who is putting his ass on the line to share what he has.
If you give it to someone, you can be prosecuted, as goes posting it.
If you make it, you can be prosecuted.
If you view it, be it accidentally, or on purpose, and even download it, you can’t be prosecuted.
That’s what I am suggesting.
Simple.

Seriously, do YOU not understand that ppl of similar thinking de facto do support each others thinking?

Yes, however that does not mean an outsider cannot support the same line of thinking.
Witch hunter thinking is bad thinking.

And, do YOU not see an issue w/ a person liking child porn and having children at their disposal?

Although I think you missed a word, “porn,” a second time, no, regardless, either way, no.
This follows the same mentality that all men are rapists, and by giving them porn, they should not be trusted around women, or whatever they find attractive.

I can honestly say I would trust my own theoretical child with many pedos I am friends with, alone, and that’s because I don’t buy into the trash the media and public sells each other. It’s ridiculous, disgusting, and hypocritical.

Get the picture, NOW?

Yes, I understand you will never be able to comprehend anything that I say regarding this issue.
Drinking and driving is directly dangerous and careless.
Watching child porn, or even coming across it, is not dangerous for anyone, nor wreck-less or careless.

And, YOU are entitled to have that “feeling”.

No, because if I had this feeling people like you would be purged, and images I don’t like would be censored, and many easily accessible child-rape videos would be purged as well, but that’s basing things of feelings, not reality.

So, tell me,

That’s the most choppy sentence I have read in months.
I’m not going to.
I simply said I would not stand by and defend someone who does such things in general, and while you’d likely want to gun down them, the people who watch it, and me for defending them, I would likely not defend the ones who made it or distributed it.
There are some I would though, but I spoke in general.

Yes, I am saying I would defend someone who “raped/molested” a child and filmed it under certain conditions.
It’s just extremely rare.

Why are you taking about the arbitrariness of degrees of nakedness/topless?

I’m not, but people do.
A naked child, or a topless one at that, can be considered sexual in the eyes of the law just for existing.
Hell, even a child in a swimsuit or in regular clothes can be.

Welcome to the law of the west.

And, I’d be very careful about who/where ya spout your ideology on child porn because someone might “poke a hole” in your argument AND YOU, too.

Well, you didn’t, to me you just made a fool of yourself.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

Originally posted by Frostbringer:
And instead of keeping them on welfare, they get a job where they can’t do any harm. Like washing dishes.

Well yes, however, the vast majority of people working as such are not low enough to do such work.
Of course you may prefer shopping with people instead of robotic workers, so there may be a job for that, however, it’s not one that must be filled. Some people genuinely enjoy being a check-out lady/man at the grocery store, for whatever reason, and that’s fine and great, there’s really no reason not to give them such a job if they enjoy it.
However, in general, it’s an easily replaced position, and no one enjoys it, so why not get rid of it?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Transgender Individuals

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

How can ya be so sensible on this issue and be so ______ on the child porn one?
-BTW, that’s rhetorical.-

Because CP is a much touchier issue for people, as is pedo-stuff in general, so it’s more likely for you to agree with me on this, than other issues, even though both are not really exactly what the majority believes about said issues.
I mean, is there not a movement for one, and not the other?

I don’t, and never will take into account the what the majority say when the few say otherwise.
I don’t care that according to most people pedos are evil child rapists who have no hearts because I have spoken to many online, and am friends with quite a few, and they say and show the complete opposite of that.
This is the same reason why I don’t mind trans-people whatsoever, because I have spoken to, interacted with, and am friends with quite a few, and I understand that they aren’t mentally ill freaks like much of the west thinks.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Compliments <3

I once took a bite of a waffle and rofl’ed all the way to another table that had pancakes because it tasted so bad.
>iktfb

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Pancakes or Waffles

Originally posted by HappyYay:

french toast

>Eating eggs
Flagged.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Pancakes or Waffles

Pancakes if you know how to cook them, otherwise waffles.
Waffles are always boring, shitty, waffles.
Pancakes can be anything from rubber and burnt tires to delicious devious artery-clogging chocolate-goodness filled fluffy delight.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Mustard or Ketchup on hotdog

All three things you mentioned are fucking disgusting.
Can I just have the bun, or plate, or whatever you were serving with the three?

 

Topic: Off-topic / Compliments <3

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator