Recent posts by Wredniak on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant Unleashed / Equalizer and Daemon save or use for SP?

Daemon seems really bad so I will probably get rid of it but what about Equalizer is it worth saving or should it be sacrificed for SP?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [To PVP Event Lucky Winners] Post your scores and rank and final winstreak

http://www.kongregate.com/forums/65-tyrant/topics/371520-the-event-is-ended

More replies there ;)

EDIT:

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / The event is ended

Originally posted by Nuzurame:

@Wredniak i would not be surprised if there are people with also 3 loses that ended outside of 50+

I would not be surprised if there were some people who lost only once but exactly in the middle of the event (35ish battle) that ended outside of the 50+.

I got win streak of 71 at one point at that is 20+ battles with 5x points. If you lost between 20-40 you did not get even one 5x battle. As many have said before it was luck based.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / The event is ended

Lost 3 times:
4th or 5th battle against Svet+Overseers+Necro Nest because DFA was the last card to draw.
77th battle against stupid imperial deck with STOVL Carrier (failed to win before 50th turn)
Last battle against RSR (“AI” started with mammoth, sprintpod and RO, i had sanctum, DFA and husk as opening hand).

I was lucky with when I lost. I faced only 2 empty decks and 6-7 whisper/cyrus + 0 drops. Most common seemed to be grimclaws.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / lol kreuzscwert so original to use my own reply against me and troll very hard becuse jelly.

Originally posted by darkfang77:
Originally posted by kreuzschwert:

There are not 10 persons with a 82 streak

okay, how about 11 people with 81, 80, 79… etc streak? Use brain before posting.

I’m 5th and I just lost my 71 win streak which was my second lose (I lost my 5th and 77th fight) and I am currently 5th. I’m pretty sure I won’t get to stay in top 10 but I guess that proves the tie is unlikely and the top will be determined by when you have lost giving differences in points. I will be really surprised if anyone in top 50 will have exactly the same number of points.

And in the event of an unlikely tie i would guess the older account would get higher place.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Win Streak

With improved matchmaking and no refills the event sounds good.
TBH I like idea of win streak, it is simple and easy to understand, what i don’t like is the implementation. I think changing it so it is +10% per win and let’s say -25%/-50% per losing would fix the problems it has atm.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [To Dev] Winstreak system is pure, unadulterated, bullshit.

Win streak was important when there were refills as it prevented someone wining one battle in 4 from getting to 1st place with just paying enough. Now that refills are gone (good thing). I think it is redundant. As many have said if someone lost let’s say 3 times but it was 3rd, 7th and last battle they will probably get better reward that someone who lost exactly at the middle or close to it. Which imo is strange and not fair. However the more loses the less important it is when it happened (unless it was let’s say 4-5 in row).

On the other hand it is not easy to find fair way to do this, if we decide based on number of wins then still someone with 65/2 can be better than 64/0 just because someone overslept or was at work and missed 3 battles. I guess +10/-50% for win/lose would be better option and then it really make event more exciting as kreuzschwert said. Going 500% → 0% is a little bit too “exciting” for me.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [TO DEVS] for the upcoming event in 23, you still miss a legendary card, please make it imperator vyer

Originally posted by Shadowhopeful:

We wouldn’t have this problem in the devs didn’t do events at all

I like events as well, just wish the old ones would come back so new players and those who missed them could get those cards. (175 WB for HoC is ridiculous IMO).

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant Unleashed / SOOO how do [I] Beat the event boss?

Originally posted by Keep6:
Originally posted by Wredniak:

I’m currently using
Vyander 4
Tartarus Scion 6
Apex 6
Anvil 5
Vigil 5
Pantheon Progeny 6
Xeno Mothership 6
Stealthy Niaq 4

I also have:
Alaric 3
Fighter Jet 1
Missile sillo 1
Pantheon Progeny 5
all commanders at 1 but Typhon and 60 SP
Any advice to beat this thing would be appreciated. I think I shouldn’t even bother with trying to beat it 50 times.

Wred! I didnt know you played Unleashed…! What faction are you in?

yup It helps put in perspective that original tyrant isn’t that bad or that cash focused.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Solstice War] Help with deck building

Originally posted by ElMoldovan:
Originally posted by Wredniak:

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/profile.php?b=cards&sid=7bf4844iYeI9

i’m interested what deck would be best I’m currently thinking something like this:

Insta lose to any fear

I didn’t say it was good lol, adding few CW would probably be good idea ^^"

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant Unleashed / SOOO how do [I] Beat the event boss?

I’m currently using
Vyander 4
Tartarus Scion 6
Apex 6
Anvil 5
Vigil 5
Pantheon Progeny 6
Xeno Mothership 6
Stealthy Niaq 4

I also have:
Alaric 3
Fighter Jet 1
Missile sillo 1
Pantheon Progeny 5
all commanders at 1 but Typhon and 60 SP
Any advice to beat this thing would be appreciated. I think I shouldn’t even bother with trying to beat it 50 times.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Solstice War] Help with deck building

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/profile.php?b=cards&sid=7bf4844iYeI9

i’m interested what deck would be best I’m currently thinking something like this:

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Tournament S6] WINNER: Death from Above*

Originally posted by Sweetnezzz:
Originally posted by yeasy:
Originally posted by lfiamoncini:
Originally posted by idkwhoiam1:
Originally posted by pinky855:
Originally posted by chinadude101:
Originally posted by Maharid:

Both cards are really useful but Flare will put a bit of spice in the ass of the enemy.

I just have this thing against Purity rares/legendaries that aren’t Odin.


Jam all, all those memories…
 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / Post Active Raid Links Here

Scythos #37,166
Join | Status | Suggested decks

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Fact] Games That Allow More Player-Player Interaction (i.e. trading) Do Better Than Those That Don't; Ergo, Devs Want Their Game To Fail

Originally posted by Darkninjalucian:


What is the point of trading anyways instead of a short term benefit and a long term benefit to corruption?

For “lucky” people like me who managed to get 6 omegas but no apex, for those who get 2x orworld and have no sanctum ect. Out of my experience this game likes to give you 3-4 copies of the same card more often than it gives you the card you want. So yes there would be use for such trading.

Do I believe it is going to be implemented? Not really.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Tournament S6] WINNER: Death from Above*

Originally posted by yeasy:
Originally posted by Maharid:

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant Unleashed / Would like to ask for some deck advice

My deck atm is:
Xeno mothership 6
Apex 6
Anvil 5
Niaq 4
Pathrazer 4
Ion Strykes 3×2
Vyander 3 as commander

I also have Scion 1.

1. My question is should i get Anvil to 6 before or after lvl scion and adding it to the deck?
2. What commander would work best with this deck? (I’m thinking Draco but really have no idea).
3. Should i stop using strykers? I feel they don’t really contribute that much and i and playing them last but then the deck would be really short.

I appreciate all advice you can give ^^

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Discussion] Buffs Vs Upgrades

Originally posted by Shadowhopeful:

Maha, lemme direct you back up to the points made. Anything PvE, you can create misc versions.
Anything sealed, buff the (un)commons to provide harder counters. Collective buffs would be better too, as then everything is bumped up around the same amount.

This would instantly render Reward and Promo upgrades utterly redundant. My other, more personal, gripe is that I cannot keep a copy of the Unique – If I upgrade Predator, I must WB a second copy if I want the original, and no way is anybody going to do that.
Pack cards are more debatable, but they can work if done properly.

You are suggesting that the whale rate changed somehow due to upgrades. I doubt this. I doubt it a lot.
And the majority of players still have a massive gold sink called Awakening. I got lucky and pulled a Zarak, but I have yet to get a single ROfficer or Eviscerator.

Also, you forget that initially, Legendary upgrades required 2 copies. It was changed by popular demand. With the Economy Update, it was reinstated, much to my annoyance (There was nowhere near the amount of complaining I expected, which probably told them that the majority was okay with this. I doubt that too.).
The only changes they have made served to make them slightly less of a gold sink, and more redundant. Why not go the full run and get rid of them?

Creating miscellaneous cards takes work, you need to find each copy of that card and make sure it was replaced, I can’t imagine devs bothering to do that relatively small amount of work. Now think how much more it would take to rebalance sealed. I can’t see devs buffing more that 4-5 rares and maybe 4 uncommons which further increase the importance of RNG because that few upgraded cards would either make huge difference or would not be relevant in the meta making buff redundant anyway.

The only way I see buffs working for sealed is if devs would get down and rework majority of cards (50% at least) that would take time of releasing new content. If you believe this is possible you are way more idealistic than I am. The amount of money devs would make from players buying WB packs for new expansion to get new cards cannot be realistically compared to reworking entire set as people who spent the most would already have those cards so no gain in that for devs. IMO that is too much work to do it right to justify it.

IMO inexpensive upgrades would be the way too go.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / Day sealed tournaments are not fun

The thing is IMO your solution would aggravate the problem not solve it. Now players know if they join and have crappy draw they can get some of their money back. Take that and you will notice less players in tourneys.

Now even with meh deck I may attempt one or two fights trying to get to 25% if you require me to do 5 fights and I see my deck is not top notch I will simply not bother with feeding points to top players and accept loosing my 10k fee without fighting a single fight. Because this is what that system will do it will not force people with bad decks to play 5 times, it will make people who might have played a little to test their luck don’t bother with it as they know they will have no chance at good place.

To sum up IMO it will make less people join tournaments and it will also make more people to be completely inactive after they join with bad deck which will reduce number of active players that can get to 1%, 5% and 10%. That “improved” would further promote randomness in tourneys as it would clearly benefit only people with lucky draws.

Originally posted by Qwandri:
Originally posted by Maharid:

The point is that with the current system even a player with a bad deck can have a possibility of a prize if he is lucky, it win 1-2 and maybe get to 50%, if 5 or more are needed the luck of the draw will simply wash away ALL players that don’t get a good deck so even more players will go away.


If a similar requirement is added i’d like to see all players that don’t meet the requirements removed from the tournament, all what they paid (wb or gold) removed from the prize and the final list conting only the players that meet the requirements with the 1-5-10-25-50% adjusted accordingly.


It sound like shit?


It is but is also more fair that simply “stealing” tournaments fee and positions from other players.


Did you know that if I don’t fight in a tournament, I will get top 50% every time? Ranking among people with no fights seems to be determined by the date you joined Kongregate, of all things.


Not really I joined when there wasn’t even 66 missions yet and I still did not end in 50% when i didn’t fight a single fight.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [BUG?]changes in rule of tournament ranking

Originally posted by MacenKrace:

cause tyrant screws u. don’t think u noticed this but only 20% of the player database wins tourneys and they keep winning them so u get ruled out automatically.

Want to win? WB up and play and see the system giving u unfair advantage such as matchmaking in tourneys and higher position even though u have the same score or even less battles.

From what i remember about tourneys if you have same score, more WON battles determine position, if those are same as well older account is placed higher.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [Bug?] Clone Project + Rally on Play = Rally the wrong guy?

Originally posted by chandl34:

I was under the impression split “On Play” cards aren’t supposed to use their “On Play” abilities at all. There was a dev post about this a while back.

The are not supposed to blitz, on play is fine i think.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [The Doctors are in, I think.] Need a deck for CotF? Come on in!

Originally posted by fatnotthin:

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/profile.php?b=cards&sid=1a84b1wFxAgF

Please help me only for cotf3

tks!


CotF3, 92,5% ordered.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [The Doctors are in, I think.] Need a deck for CotF? Come on in!

Originally posted by manaboy100:

manaboy100

Worse cardpool ever plz helpz


You have 2 DFA upgrade them asap
CotF1, 76,6% ordered. DFA* can be subbed by Brutasaur gives 72,8%
CotF2. 91% ordered (with DFA*)
CotF3, 86,5% ordered.

CotF3, 97,3% for when you have grimclaw

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [The Doctors are in, I think.] Need a deck for CotF? Come on in!

Originally posted by WittyP:

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/profile.php?cc=1&sid=081ab744NkI9 is my profile

help for CoTF 1 please, thanks


70,3% on CotF1 ordered
78,5% on CotF2 ordered Moya as commander
73,9% on CotF3 ordered Ayrkrane instead of Rifter, played before Apex

92% on CotF3 with one Grimclaw ordered.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant / [The Doctors are in, I think.] Need a deck for CotF? Come on in!

Originally posted by zigada:
Originally posted by Wredniak:
Originally posted by thenewampkit:

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/profile.php?cc=1&sid=7cd58b5sJJyF thanks.


CotF1 ordered 65,3%
CotF2 ordered 81,6%
CotF3 ordered 72% Sidoze or Duncan as commander, Monarch instead of Rifter


Ordered 91,2% for CotF3 with one Grimclaw

@Psycho it’s probably because of different starting decks, sometimes sim get stuck when changing one card decreases win rate despite you can get better one by changing 2 or more would be better. It just needs little push ;)

I’m using the second deck above for CotF3. Can I improve it at all with necro nest, nimbus, or hekaton? I’d love a 3 card deck if possible

Thank you!

Neither of those cards alone improves win rate, without your card pool it is hard to come up with 3 card deck.