Recent posts by maboroshi83 on Kongregate

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Sunder Description and Preview

Sunder is death to all fear decks and maybe HOC, Mobile Command or Test of Mettle. But it does very little against current meta with Rigs, wallstall or Mantis.

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Flashpoint Expansion Announcement!

Topic: Tyrant / [Powercreeped] Bye Soulsteel Mount, Hi World-(Game)-breaker

Originally posted by purei:

Originally posted by maboroshi83:

it’s crappy now with on kill

it’s always been ‘on kill’.

Yeah I know, was just saying people got excited over a typo and lots of qq. As for the card, it’s not that great.

Topic: Tyrant / [Powercreeped] Bye Soulsteel Mount, Hi World-(Game)-breaker

it’s crappy now with on kill

Topic: Tyrant / [Suggestion] Ladder Seasons

Originally posted by darkfang77:

+1 but too much effort clearly for devs.

this

if dev considering this, it would be great but this will take a lots to pull it off

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Regarding Faction Levels

It’s not just about cards, heck give us level 20 factions anything to aim for anything at all would be enough. It’s true that right now top factions competing each other for ranking but little reward is not that hard to make.

- new cards ( introduced everytime one faction reach that level so that card will not be outdated like widowmaker); you can just open card creating contest like before and I’m sure you will get some balanced and amazing card

- Alt art cards

- Energy Refill, gold, permanent stamina booster

- Title

Seriously, anything would do

Topic: Tyrant / [Recruitment] [Level 18] Evocati, Elite Roman soldiers

up and go

Topic: Tyrant / [Praefectus Evocatorum] The Evocati Is Recruiting! Get Tokens With Us!

Bumpity bump

Topic: Tyrant / My 2 cents about what this game was/is/or is going to become

make every single cards in game unique, problem solved. No more sabre spam, rig spam, EQG spam, zarak spam, MW spam, Monarch spam, TI spam, sycophant spam and it will actually make deck building fun. Remember the days when clasic strike deck shone, all cards there are mission rewards and unique.

Topic: Tyrant / Congrats to the First 100CR Faction

Congrats Rakk, shao and co

It’s well derserved

Topic: Tyrant / Wierd rares I own

I love Marine, he’s just so random.

Topic: Tyrant / Thank you Devs (and Hoschisack)

Originally posted by inorix:

Originally posted by SeanDougherty86:

Originally posted by inorix:

Originally posted by Philosopher:

Thank you Devs, for listening to Hoschisack and others, and giving players a choice between conquest or faction wars.

There is no such choice. With tokens guaranteed without doing anything at all other than being in a high level faction, those high level factions have no reason to conquest at all.

Exactly

Now people will do it because they enjoy it. Not because they have to do it or fall behind on the meta.

Tokens are the only way that free players can keep close to the success that WB players have. Conquest was forcing factions to participate otherwise they would fall further and further behind.

“to enjoy” it sounds nice but in reality, a lot less players will be willing to invest in the vast higher activity requirements of conquest when they can just join a high level faction and twiddle their thumbs.

Even crazy ppl like those in WB who don’t care about tokens will have no reason to conquest as all the juicy competition will be skipping conquest altogether.

+1 this

Everyone kept saying " for fun this, for fun that"; risk versus reward, it would be a illogical to try to dominate in conquest. If this change goes live, expect conquest map becomes barren waste land. WB is crazy but they’re not stupid beyond logic.

Topic: Tyrant / Best overall commander April 2013, vote results

Originally posted by stormcommando:

Originally posted by hunterhogan:

New list is
Atlas*
Dracorex
Halcyon the Corrupt
Lord Halcyon
Moya
Xaedan*
Yurich*

If you voted in the first survey, your votes do NOT carry over to this survey, so vote again. It’s only one question. Results are displayed after you vote.

Draco is gone. No one uses him anymore.

Quest/ missions/ raids and of course GS deck

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Conquest Update and Map Reset Next Week!

This will kill conquest, might not be right off but it will be a slow death.

Topic: Tyrant / Is Moya Overrated?

Originally posted by codemaster3000:

Originally posted by catepillar:

Originally posted by codemaster3000:

Originally posted by cslaci:

With proper cardpool moya is by far the best commander of the current meta. Both def and surge. For surge it has at least alternatives, but even there not outclassed.

what kind of decks are made with moya? i think the most dangerous ones i’ve seen are ravenous beasts/twincannon buoys among other power raider cards, but they’re beatable with the right draw and no troll regening

rainbow decks do well… also fear decks aren’t really harmed by having her. And she can be misleading. Think you are going against a slow roll/wall stall, and BAM FEAR!

Wallstalls like having commanders that can take hits.

Basically, you can play her with just about everything.

my experience with moya has been this: when i’m using her for a wallstall, she doesn’t have siege so i pretty much always lose to another wallstall deck with a siege 1 commander. when i’m using ti, she survives for longer, but i’d rather have the heal 2 from morgan to keep things alive to drop that vial and seal the deal. in raider slow roll decks, i’ve lost 90% of the time to any form of augmented strike (basically a sabre in the first 3 drops equals a loss). i played around with dfa/vortex for a bit, and it does help, but the pierce 3 from sabres, which blows through pyro rig’s armor is just killer. however, raider slow roll does very well against every other type of deck so maybe i’ll just settle with it for now, and accept the losses to sabres

by far the best commander if one has cardpool to build good deck around it.

- upgraded destruction + cyclops and WWF could take care of wallstall unless u have very bad draw
- Raider slowroll deck, be more flexible with cards combination. You don’t need mono raiders, use Aegis, Mending Sanctum, Monarch, charged purge. Just need one Pyro Rig goes active.

Moya is also an auto win against TI, GS and Concussive Guards; with Atlas it’s 50/50 if evade or jam activated. It also nullify those annoying HOC summon crush.

Topic: Tyrant / Add Wall to Mortar Bunker, Remove Wall From Asylum

you’re out of your element df

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Do not share accounts

Originally posted by Provokes:

Originally posted by maboroshi83:

- Provokes idea: increase stam cap for everyone but put a stam cap for a faction. Good idea but stam cap for a faction can be counter productive since bunch of people will sit around with nothing to do.

As much I like the increased stamina cap idea, my idea is not for an increase stam cap but for the establishment of a collective stamina pool for every faction. This pool of stamina can be upgraded if a certain number of faction components are purchased. The limit to how many times a faction member can use this stamina pool to participate in PVP is directly related to that member’s loyalty.

This will allow the more active and senior members to “share” the stamina of players who are inactive.

My bad, edited my post

- BeerBaron idea: stam cap remains the same, everyone online can participate in faction wars and gain LP, XP and gold normally. Only 25% or 50% top netscore count toward the final result. The best so far imo, also raise healthy competition within a faction.

- Provokes idea: introduce collective stam pool for a faction, can be upgraded by faction components. Member participation ( stam pool drain) depends on their LP. Good idea but can be unfair to new active, hungry players or when one of long term players is MIA.

- Synap idea: increase stam cap but limit stam can be spent on one war.

And a bunch of unrealistic ideas. I like BeerBaron idea the most although with conquest sharing the same stamina bar, thing can be complicated for faction stam management ( again it’s our end, not your end so I suppose whichever faction manage more efficiently win)

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Do not share accounts

Originally posted by synapticon:

Originally posted by BeerBaron:

Trying to catch sharers etc will not solve the problem they will pop up like weeds. You need to treat the root cause which is sharing gives an edge remove the edge and they will wilt and die. Already suggested a solution twice and will be damned to suggest it again so it will be ignored.

I admit I haven’t seen your suggestion on this, but your REASONING is absolutely spot-on and we truly believe a stamina cap solves (or at least mitigates) the given problem. I wish I could see everything on this forum – I truly do – but it’s huge and mostly full of hilarious MS paint drawings that distract me.

I will sum it up for you

- BeerBaron idea: stam cap remains the same, everyone online can participate in faction wars and gain LP, XP and gold normally. Only 25% or 50% top netscore count toward the final result. The best so far imo, also raise healthy competition within a faction.

- Provokes idea: increase stam cap for everyone but put a stam cap for a faction. Good idea but stam cap for a faction can be counter productive since bunch of people will sit around with nothing to do.

- Your idea: increase stam cap but limit stam can be spent on one war.

And a bunch of unrealistic ideas. I like BeerBaron idea the most although with conquest sharing the same stamina bar, thing can be complicated for faction stam management ( again it’s our end, not your end so I suppose whichever faction manage more efficiently win)

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Do not share accounts

Originally posted by synapticon:

Originally posted by maboroshi83:

Originally posted by synapticon:

Originally posted by SeanDougherty86:

Originally posted by synapticon:

The only reason (as far as I understand) that players do not want a much higher stamina cap is due to Faction Wars. What if we drastically increased the stamina cap (e.g. 300 to 600) but limited the amount of stamina you could spend in a faction war to, say, 250?

I think that would make it too complicated for the layman user.

Why are people so opposed to increase stamina cap? It would be a level playing field for all

What if war length was increased to 8 hours instead of 6?

I’d like to hear an answer to this question too – why? Especially if we prevent ‘feeders’ by reducing stamina to 0 when a new player joins a faction.

Sean suggestions contradict themselves.

- Buying stam upgrade will not level playing field
- Increase stam cap means one active pool can be make or break in a single war/ conquest invasion, hence encourage more account sharing which in turn, will not level playing field.

-Nobody is talking about stam upgrades, so you’re wrong.
-Yes it can make or break a SINGLE war or invasion, but not multiple ones. This does not encourage account sharing at all because the cap is shared over time. You’re wrong.

- I was replying to Sean post 28 minutes ago when he suggested to buy stam upgrade with WB or gold, my bad I quoted the wrong one.

- You are right in conquest since FP gain/loss are the same but in faction wars it’s different since FP gain/loss depends on ranking hence each war has different priorities.

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Do not share accounts

Originally posted by synapticon:

Originally posted by SeanDougherty86:

Originally posted by synapticon:

The only reason (as far as I understand) that players do not want a much higher stamina cap is due to Faction Wars. What if we drastically increased the stamina cap (e.g. 300 to 600) but limited the amount of stamina you could spend in a faction war to, say, 250?

I think that would make it too complicated for the layman user.

Why are people so opposed to increase stamina cap? It would be a level playing field for all

What if war length was increased to 8 hours instead of 6?

I’d like to hear an answer to this question too – why? Especially if we prevent ‘feeders’ by reducing stamina to 0 when a new player joins a faction.

Sean suggestions contradict themselves.

- Buying stam upgrade will not level playing field
- Increase stam cap means one active pool can be make or break in a single war/ conquest invasion, hence encourage more account sharing which in turn, will not level playing field.

Topic: Tyrant / [Dev] Do not share accounts

Originally posted by hunterhogan:

Without waiting for Synapse to tell us why they don’t like account sharing, I’ll throw an idea out there.

In Heroes of Kung Fu, your dojo (faction house, if you will) was only open for six hours per day. Your faction could only be attacked while the faction was open. The faction leadership could change the hours that they dojo was open. This allowed the leadership to plan for defense.

This idea would not be plug-and-play with Tyrant, however. I think it could be viable for Faction Wars, but I don’t see how it could work with Conquest. So, as long as FW and CQ are linked, I don’t know that it would work.

6 hours = 1 war, 2 factions could trade wars all day and save stam for CQ.

Topic: Tyrant / [TO DEVS]:My faction BAD BEAT was destroyed by someone else! Are you gonna do something about it?

Originally posted by uizito:

Originally posted by maboroshi83:

Originally posted by uizito:

STOP TELLING THINGS YOU DON’T KNOW!!

I HAVE NEVER SHARED MY ACCOUNT WITH ANYONE, SOMEONE GOT ACCESS TO IT!

couple of options:

- You were drunk and told your bro your password
- You were sleep walking and disbanded yourself
- A ninja cat hacked your account then proceed to disband using leet skill on 6 fingers ( 6 toes ?)
- You were hypnotized by evil WB through layers of subliminal decipher message
- You shared your account*s* and ashamed to admit to public to save face

I would go with option 3

Serious though I will be greatly disappointed if devs restore BB

Disappointing is that post of yours if you think this is funny.
If devs dont do something about this, Tyrant no more for me and some friends.

And whose fault is that?

Maybe own it up to your faction members and admit you play a part in ruining their Tyrant experience.

Topic: Tyrant / [TO DEVS]:My faction BAD BEAT was destroyed by someone else! Are you gonna do something about it?

Originally posted by uizito:

STOP TELLING THINGS YOU DON’T KNOW!!

I HAVE NEVER SHARED MY ACCOUNT WITH ANYONE, SOMEONE GOT ACCESS TO IT!

couple of options:

- You were drunk and told your bro your password
- You were sleep walking and disbanded yourself
- A ninja cat hacked your account then proceed to disband using leet skill on 6 fingers ( 6 toes ?)
- You were hypnotized by evil WB through layers of subliminal decipher message
- You shared your account*s* and ashamed to admit to public to save face

I would go with option 3

Serious though I will be greatly disappointed if devs restore BB

Topic: Tyrant / [Petition] Nerf TI/Drones

Originally posted by BeerBaron:

The scarier deck by far is gs and flare of courage. That combo wants to be flanked and unless you are lucky removing all gs off the board is a very hard thing to do. The fact that it completely counters ti fear is a bonus. The odd wallstall gives it an issue same with atlas* odin* rainbows if no evades proc but that’s a rarity.

With dracorex, that deck is tough cookie. Not a single pure 6 damage 2 wait card, Odin himself will cry if strike gets invaded, reason to include upgraded slayer in deck though.

Topic: Tyrant / BAD BEAT Catfaced

This makes all those posts uitizo defending Fishes even more hilarious