Recent posts by Senakus on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Another Crash of the .Com Now Inevitable

Yeah, Google stock is totally doing terribly.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Regarding SWTOR

I think you misunderstood “serious” in “serious discussion”.

Go outside and play.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Let's talk About vaults here.

Probably osmium because it’s dense and it’s fumes can kill my enemies.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Two Black Holes

Originally posted by Epsilon_Omega:

If they are close in mass, then I would imagine the intrum would be a gravity well of which each other black hole would absorb one another, the intrum would literally stretch reality and cause another force to form in place.

Enough said;
Two wrongs make three.

When two objects collide it typically has to do with momentum(mv) And because of the sheer gravitional forces produced by the black holes, the collision would be inelastic, resulting in the masses adding.
In astronomy it is widely believed that black holes collide all the time, because of their attraction to other massive objects


Indeed. It is the same with fat people. They get married all the time because of their attraction to other massive objects.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Quote Discussion, Current quote: “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.”

Good thing Hitler acted, else he would have bred pestilence.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Shooting death of Trayvon Martin

Originally posted by tenco1:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

You know, after discussing this with a few people I know, there was something about the “Stand Your Ground,” and this whole confrontation that one person mentioned the possibility of both sides feeling threatened? Which would mean that Martin was threatened by the person following him, and Zimmerman was threatened by what he though Martin might be doing. Then the self-defense law would start to conflict, since was Zimmerman murdering Martin because Martin felt threatened and did whatever he did in self-defense, or was he just shooting in self-defense because Martin was just attacking him?

It really becomes a chicken and the egg situation.

No. Zimmerman won, so Trayvon didn’t really act self-defensively enough.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / What defines "right" and "wrong"?

Really, morality is instinctual?

Never knew, thanks for enlightening me.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / New Cancer Treatment?

Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

Of course you all know how much our government loves its taxpayers.

Originally posted by Senakus:

How long did you spend researching external motivations of the film, such as sponsors and political leanings?

Public opinion is part of my research.

In what way?

Wait, you’re telling me to research into something I care nothing about? No. Go get yourself educated and get some researching skills.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / New Cancer Treatment?

How long did you spend researching external motivations of the film, such as sponsors and political leanings?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / New Cancer Treatment?

Originally posted by WwarMmachine:

I know it’s possible it’s wrong, but I guess I’m just wondering, what if it’s real?

I think you can figure that one out.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Shooting death of Trayvon Martin

Originally posted by tenco1:
Originally posted by Senakus:

I don’t understand how it has racial overtones. Because the kid was black?

Now that sounds racist.

Well if you read about what happened and think for a second, you might be able to see why there might be racial overtones.

What did it say? Summarize. Did Zimmerman say “I did it because his people are from africa and I hate africa”?

Because it definitely has racial overtones then.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Homeschool and Social Development

Homeschool is good because they teach gaddang evolution in public schools these days! No creationism!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Shooting death of Trayvon Martin

I don’t understand how it has racial overtones. Because the kid was black?

Now that sounds racist.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Why do you

Originally posted by NaturalReject:

Why do you feel that your thread would be better if you cut off the topic so noone knows what the hell you want to talk about before going into your thread?

Alas, I don’t feel it would be better.

I would have had to cut it off midway through the sentence either way (due to the full sentence of my question being too long). I would rather imply no meaning in the topic rather than imply something which it is not.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Why do you

feel the need to post on the internet about your religious beliefs and others religious beliefs?

There has been a lot of debate on this forum about religion. In these debates I have noticed there are a lot of atheists (and theists) on Kongregate. My question is to you atheists (and theists): What led you to post about it on the internet, Why are you posting about it now and your thoughts on the future without posts about religion. If you do not post about religion, post your views on posting about religion with respect to your own belief system about netiquette.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Marijuana Legalization

Originally posted by Cdavid2950:

Ok. What got me thinking was this article;

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/the-latest-drug-of-choice-for-teens-nutmeg-yes-nutmeg/article1822253/

I didn't read the article, but that sounds mad sensational bro.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / The Box

Is this the same as the son/daughter dilemma?

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gays, Yay or Nay?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gays, Yay or Nay?

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Senakus:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Indy111:

I just wanted to share my opinion is all.

Well, YOU DID ASK: ""…it is kind of true, right?’’
I assumed ya wanted to discuss it.
My bad.
Opinion ONLY noted and accepted.
Then thrown in the trash where all such things end up in SD.

There is no reason to believe he didn’t want to discuss it. However, you went straight for the ad hominem. That is not discussing it.

Do YOU even know what an ad hominem is?
My comment went DIRECTLY to the merit of his post….NOT TO OR ABOUT HIM.
AND, in SD, just shitting out some lame-ass “opinion” ain’t gonna even carry ya to the road let alone take ya very far down it.

Omega Doom did much more of a direct comment as to his PERSONAL abilities: ""the indoctrination done to you is perhaps just as bad as what i was just discussing with Reject. i sure hope you’ll come to your senses some day."" AND, even that was done more in sympathy than insult.

PLUS, there is “no discussing it” when one party cares not to participate….only state opinion and cease.

You called him a troll (or stupid). That’s an attack against the opponent.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gays, Yay or Nay?

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Indy111:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Indy111:
Originally posted by EPR89:
Originally posted by Indy111:

I always always taught as growing up that gay’s were pretty much Anti-Christian and evil people. I usually stayed out of it but I mean, it is kind of true, right?

Not sure if troll…

I’m serious, not trying to offend anyone or troll but think about it. Gays are unnatural are rather obsolete compared to “normal” people.

Okay. Even though I’m old and have a vast amount of information on this issue,,,I keep an open mind and see “wot-ya-gotz” as to what “proof” ya have to back up your opinion. Also, I take it ya didn’t take the time to read the 21 previous pages of this thread where a whoooole lot of information in contrast to YOUR opinion has been presented.

I just wanted to share my opinion is all.

Well, YOU DID ASK: ""…it is kind of true, right?’’
I assumed ya wanted to discuss it.
My bad.
Opinion ONLY noted and accepted.
Then thrown in the trash where all such things end up in SD.

There is no reason to believe he didn’t want to discuss it. However, you went straight for the ad hominem. That is not discussing it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Do we have free will?

Originally posted by developous:
Originally posted by Senakus:

So how can someone know they have free will

By one’s beliefs. The greater the conviction, the freeer that person thinks, but beware the eletist, for he is forced into believing he must do what he is doing.

ah gotcha

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Do we have free will?

So how can someone know they have free will

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Why do people seem to hate atheists so much?

Go with Christ, brah.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / When Will The USA Move On From 9/11?

At least the terrorists didn’t use atomic bombs, unlike a couple of other terrorist attacks which have.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Religion Is Escapisim From The Fear Of Death

Originally posted by MooseDishes:
Originally posted by Zombiekilla2:
Originally posted by DaCoolBoi:

I find it quite unbelievable that there are people claiming human beings have been around for only 6000 years, Modern man has existed for 40,000 years but only socially evolving for 5000 years and to all those people who say 40,000 years ago humanity were just cells, That’s a load of bullshit too, The only time we were cells was in 1 Billion years ago and the Earth is 8 billion years old and the universe is roughly calculated to be in the trillions and now in a page about my atheism we are asking a 12 year old if he’s actually 12, This is how low religious people will sink to divert topic so they don’t have to listen to questions they don’t have the answer to.

universe is around 13b years old, earth is around 4.5 yrs old and i dun give a shit bout cells

EARTH IS 4.6 BYO

U MAD

He must have gotten his information from a source 100 million years old.