# Recent posts by omark96 on Kongregate

 1514 posts Hey, at least he’s got a suiting name ;P hahaha 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... You are free to take it as whatever you want to. However, if you honestly believe that you “won” the argument then you’re horribly wrong. There was nothing to be won and nothing to be lost. But yeah, I stepped out of that argument since I knew we were going nowhere with it and that continuing further would still not get us anywhere. I won’t respond to you anymore here on the forum regarding the question that was being discussed and sure, if you want to be the pigeon that struts around like it won (lit reference), then feel free to do so, I won’t stop you. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Waraxe, I only have one thing to say about what you just said and that is: No one needs biased opinions so maybe you should shut up. :) 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / S2D Guild? Sorry to necro this thread, but I can’t be the only on to have noticed this: In fact, Kingk has even been contacted about it and the only response from him was that it should go away as the off. fame expires. However, I would like to say that about a month is a little long wait time for the bosses to expire lol. The fame hasn’t even moved a single point since the disbanding. Oh well, pretty funny glitch that does nothing haha ^^ 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / Black Market? You guys don’t seem to realize that it costs money to make an update(Except for maybe ans). This game is F2P which means you don’t have to invest money unless you want to. I strongly doubt that any of you guys who have responded to this thread have invested any major money into this game to enable it to stay alive. Ofc I might be wrong, but as I said, I find it rather unlikely. If you guys had been the least interested in the survival of this game then you should have invested money in it. But hey look on the bright side, this game should die quite soon, so you won’t have to worry for all too long. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... You need to understand that we aren’t discussing a general case. We’re not discussing something that could happen. Sure, before lf2ian’s post then it might have been about mystic abuses in general, but as soon as he mentioned HaD it all started to be about a specific case. My question was all about HaD and I wondered how it was an abuse by Nitroidman to just build a mystic all by himself. In fact, you make it very clear that we’re talking about the specific case of HaD. You base all your arguments on unfounded assumptions. You assume he had the intention to abuse something, which you can see isn’t true when you have all the facts. I’m gonna do an attempt at making a similar example that you made, so let’s assume this happens: Person A talks to person B about A’s friend C. A says that C was out drinking last night to which B responds “He shouldn’t drive home drunk!”. A responds “Well, he didn’t, he walked home, which wasn’t illegal the last time I checked”. B reacts to this with “Well, if he had driven home then it would have been illegal and he shouldn’t do that!”. It really is that. All people saw was a 1 man mystic which suddenly disappeared. They immediately assumed it was an attempt to abuse something and you continued it all by your attempt to add a possible event that could’ve happened in that specific case, but in reality didn’t happen. However, let’s assume we were talking about a general case and not about the specific case of HaD then what do we get? Well… Your first post becomes invalid ‘cause if we’re discussing general cases then how can I be biased? Or is one of the assumptions that I’m related to every other person/guild in the whole game? No, but seriously, just let the whole thing go. The discussion was about whether or not HaD abused the MW which from what I know didn’t happen. No one else has posted anything that points at it either. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Maybe you don’t understand what I wrote in my original post. What I asked was “How is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself?”. The reason I could ask that question is ‘cause I know that nit wasn’t played by someone else aka being an alt. If you know that fact then you can look at things differently. All you’ll see is people arguing about a perfectly fine mystic. And also, that’s why I also precised my statement somewhat. Or at least so I thought. So no, I’m not trying to fit my statement into a vacuum, I’m only trying to get you all to realize that every 1 man mystic isn’t built by alts. Neither does it instantly mean that the person who built the mystic will jump over to another guild to kill it themselves. So yeah, all I want to know is how people could be so sure it was an abuse and call him out as a cheater without any proof whatsoever. Also, if you take some time to read my 2nd post then you’ll soon see that I haven’t said it’s ok with alts bringing up mystics. Here I’ll do the favor for you “Then what rules have I broken? What have I abused? […] It’s when you use an alt(s) to build a mystic on the last spot almost securing that your own guild will be the one dealing the most damage”. It might be poorly worded, but it still states that I consider mystics built by alts as abusing the rules. So, if you have the facts that he isn’t an alt, he didn’t jump over to any other guild and he didn’t build it as the last mystic to secure that some other guild could have it almost all alone, do you still consider it being an abuse? 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... And you seem to miss my point. I’m trying to say that no person is unbiased and therefor is every opinion just as much worth. You told me to shut up if I’m in any way related and I’m just curious, if you’re inactive then why would you take your time to respond to my post? It would seem to me like you chose that for some specific reason, that you wanted to “attack” me. Hmm… Oh well, maybe that kind of bias isn’t the same. Also, I made a mistake in my previous post… That mistake was to not include what RaptorKris said. It actually brings an important point to all of this. Originally posted by RaptorKris:HaD was up near the top so everyone had time to set them… I hardly believe all the guilds in DW would have their diplos locked during almost the whole day. So, there’s no way this could’ve secured his own guild a free mystic which no one else could hit. Now, if it had been the last mystic then it might have been true, but yeah… That wasn’t the case. It didn’t create any advantages for anyone and no one lost something on it. It was just a mystic like every damn other mystic. So, once again I’ll ask you, how is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself? (And counting on that you would jump over to your own guild without exploiting something doesn’t qualify since that’s a different case. The one I’m talking about is simply where you build a mystic and stay in your guild through the war). 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Waraxe, no matter how unbiased you seem to think you are there’s one thing you have to understand and that is that you aren’t. To be unbiased you need refrain from involving your own thoughts and emotions. You have to look objectively at things, you have to see it for what it is and not what it could be. As soon as you start to involve opinions then you become biased. However, let’s look at what happened. Lf2ian made a comment about HaD doing something similar to what has been described earlier in the thread. This he’s actually doing very unbiased. He only describes the situation out of what he could see, namely a guild with 1 member that suddenly disappear. Nothing wrong with that. Then we get to DS’ post and it’s here it all starts. Do you notice how DS calls nitroidman (The one who was the GM of HaD) weird. He’s putting his own thoughts and values into it all. As you can see he doesn’t seem to have positive thoughts about Nit, which could indicate that he might have personal agendas about all of this. He even takes it so far that he’s expressing his frustration about it all with “OH GOD WHY?!”. And now it’s time for a comeback for Lf2ian. Now he’s making clear what his thoughts about this matter is and that is that Nit intended to abuse the mystics. So, now he’s biased too along with DS. They both seem to have their own opinions about what happened. To me it seems like Lf2ian no longer is after the “truth”, but rather hanging out Nit as a cheater and abuser. And you see, it’s not until now I enter the image. My post was not unbiased and I haven’t claimed that either. However, what you’ve got quoted is something I would call “fairly unbiased”. That question is biased in the context, but taken out of the context it’s completely unbiased. It doesn’t have any value in itself. However, what is completely biased in that post is what you didn’t include in your quote. It’s the “And since when the hell is HaD any of your business?”-part (Not completely sure what I wrote, but it was something like that). Moving on we get to Lf2ian’s post (Yes, I jumped over Kris, simply ‘cause his post wasn’t part of the argue). There he’s making sure to let us all know what kind off abuse that Nit might have been doing and also why he thinks so. Btw, have you noticed how no proof whatsoever have been posted so far? And there we get to you and your post. This is actually quite an interesting phenomena. When you’re telling me that my posts are unrelevant and that I should shut up ‘cause I’m biased then you’re actually putting some kind off value on my post and make yourself biased. You see, if you really were unbiased then you would look at my post and see what I had written and be completely neutral to it. So, using your own logic you’ve rendered your own post invalid. Furthermore, you’re actually even more biased than you want to appear as. You’re in CD and HaD and CD has a history, not an all too flattering history if you ask me. Whether you care about the game now or not doesn’t actually matter, if you once formed an opinion you can’t go back to being neutral. You can change from being positive to negative and from negative to more negative only to go to less negative, but you can’t go to completely neutral. And to finish this post, you all based your opinions on what you could see from the outside. I on the other hand talk to nit every now and then, I know that he wasn’t being played as an alt. I know what his intentions with joining HaD again was. I know him as a person and the guild as more than just a guild. You guys on the other hand just saw yet another single man guild which disappeared and assumed it was just like all the other guilds. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... I didn’t remove it. A mod must have. And to be honest, I didn’t even notice that it was removed. I guess someone got offended by the fact that not everything concerns them. And if you wanna know what I was referring to then it was DS’s post: Originally posted by DeathStryke:HaD… which guild was disbanded by that weird GM a few months ago. Maybe he wanted to reunite his guild. OH GOD WHY?! And as you could see in the quoted post by Waraxe it got removed before I replied back. By then I had even forgotten what I wrote in my original post. In that post he told me to stfu, but in the quoted part there’s no mention of HaD. So yeah… Originally posted by waraxe:Originally posted by omark96:How is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself? If you jump over to your guild and kill it thereby securing yourself an uncontested mystic. I know you were on good terms with HaD so maybe stfu if you’re in any way related. Nobody needs biased opinions. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Maybe I wouldn’t have answered, maybe I would have, no one knows the answer to that question. There’s no way we will every know what would have happened if HaD wasn’t mentioned. However, the only thing I asked was “How is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself?”. Does my question mention HaD? Nope and therefore it’s a general question that could be asked in whatever the case might have been. There’s no post by kingk that states that it’s against the rules to build a mystic all by yourself. So I was curios to know how it could be an abuse since you so clearly were convinced that it was. And I’m not the one to post things that clearly goes against what I’ve said earlier… So… Lf2ian, would you please explain that? 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / THIS WILL SAVE US May I just ask this: Overthrown by whom and why? If he actually would get the whole ownership of the game and the servers then he’s completely free to ban whoever he wants whenever he wants. “We reserve the right to terminate your access to the game at any time without prior notice.” Oh and a funny little sidenote is that if you “carefully” read the ToS then you’ll soon notice that you do not own your own character or anything it has ;P “We reserve all rights to our services and games. Any content acquired from your use of our services and games, including and not limited to any characters or content you created and any virtual item or currency, are sole properties of Playmage LLC. We reserve the rights to change the nature and the term of service or cancel the service at any time.” 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Lf2ian, please, explain yourself. Originally posted by lf2ian:I think he wanna abuse the MW, a guild with one player means we can directly hit the boss without any defender. Moreover, every time you spend 2e, every time you get 4e amount of coins. THAT IS AN ABUSE. 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... Originally posted by lf2ian:We are just talking about something related to this topic. It’s fine if a small guild builds it up, but HaD just disbanded itself (or got merged) right after the war. There is just a possibility that he did this for his alt or he is an alt. I’m not going to complain because I could also benefit from it. EDIT: Please make a footnote if it’s an edited post. You know what I say. Originally posted by waraxe:Originally posted by omark96:How is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself? If you jump over to your guild and kill it thereby securing yourself an uncontested mystic. I know you were on good terms with HaD so maybe stfu if you’re in any way related. Nobody needs biased opinions. The thing is, no one has confirmed that he moved over to another guild to hit the mystic himself. And honestly if I build a whole mystic at the Guardian spot or anything else and then move over to another guild to hit my own guild… Then what rules have I broken? What have I abused? Sure, if you guild jumped using some kinda loop hole then it might be considered an abuse, but nah, not even then. It’s when you use an alt(s) to build a mystic on the last spot almost securing that your own guild will be the one dealing the most damage. You could argue about the fact that HaD’s now gone, but that’s not against any rules or have I been misinformed? Oh and as for the biased opinions, you all seem to be biased enough already, so yeah… 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / ... How is it an abuse to build a mystic all by yourself? 1514 posts I haven’t photoshopped anything. The only image manipulating program I’ve used is Paint and that was to crop and save the image. :) This is the truth and anyone saying anything else is lying. :))) Oh and btw, I’ve pretty much stopped care what people here think about me. Besides, I’m getting pretty close to 1500 posts, that sure would be a nice ending number. 1514 posts Hah! I’m better than ya’ll! 1514 posts Topic: Dream World / hire me Don’t hire this guy. He’s a serious looter and whiner. Plus you shouldn’t make these kinda threads, they tend to get looked. ;P Oh and: kwll has LEFT the guild. 0 days 12 hrs 57 mins ago kwll Fawk you all! 0 days 12 hrs 58 mins ago 1514 posts Aad, for being someone who says that no one is perfect you sure have high thoughts about yourself. So, yeah, cool down and stop trying to make yourself look smart or something like that… But hmm… How do you convince a mad man that he’s mad when according to his logic you’re the one who’s mad. 1514 posts Originally posted by RaptorKris:Originally posted by Tumalu:Originally posted by Vusa:Originally posted by omark96:Originally posted by RaptorKris:Originally posted by omark96:Btw, I just noticed another thing. According to Aad then is 2-18=16. I’m starting to doubt either his math knowledge ;P Or wait, nvm… Maybe it’s just his English that is failing him again… Either way he has to admit that he really needs to learn some shit… I agree, I’m just confused on what age has to do with being smart. Not everyone who is older is smart…people learn at different paces or struggle on subjects. And let’s not forget about the fact that you learn different things at different ages depending on what country you are from. And math is such a subject where there really isn’t any correct order of learning. Well, starting with 1+1=2 makes more sense than $(log-i)/(i) = log x$ I want in on this quote pyramid. Another pyramid? :P. There is a difference between day to day maths. (working out money and change etc) and that equation crap…But I do not walk into a shop and before buying something get out a notepad and work out all my purchases as equations. Either give the cashier a £5 or £10 note or put your card into one of those machines and it does it all for you :P While you are correct on that one Vusa then please answer this: What makes most sense, learning that $\sum_{k=1}^{5}k = 1+2+3+4+5$ Which equals 15. Or that $x^{2}+6x+9=16$ Gives x the values 7 and -1. That’s what I meant that there’s no correct order of learning. In some places you learn certain things before you learn other things. It’s all a matter of the school systems’ preferences. And a little note to that is that most people in Sweden learn my 2nd example before learning the first one. Oh and for those that wondered, I just didn’t wanna ruin the pyramid building :) 1514 posts Originally posted by RaptorKris:Originally posted by omark96:Btw, I just noticed another thing. According to Aad then is 2-18=16. I’m starting to doubt either his math knowledge ;P Or wait, nvm… Maybe it’s just his English that is failing him again… Either way he has to admit that he really needs to learn some shit… I agree, I’m just confused on what age has to do with being smart. Not everyone who is older is smart…people learn at different paces or struggle on subjects. And let’s not forget about the fact that you learn different things at different ages depending on what country you are from. And math is such a subject where there really isn’t any correct order of learning. 1514 posts Btw, I just noticed another thing. According to Aad then is 2-18=16. I’m starting to doubt his math knowledge ;P Or wait, nvm… Maybe it’s just his English that is failing him again… Either way he has to admit that he really needs to learn some shit… 1514 posts Originally posted by Tumalu:Hey RaptorKris, Guess what? Your an idiot. Oh and raptor don’t forget that your stupid too ;P 1514 posts Originally posted by Entaroadun:Originally posted by Davo1219:Originally posted by kroner20:Originally posted by Tumalu:Originally posted by omark96:Originally posted by Tumalu:Originally posted by waraxe:Originally posted by Aaditya:Originally posted by The_Average_Nerd:Originally posted by Aaditya:Originally posted by RaptorKris:Aaditya, why did you not solve omarks equation thingy majig? Originally posted by omark96: Amendment #1 says Freedom of speech as one of its aspects. So, you can’t make my talk Anshul or Rappy. :p Also, maybe I just don’t feel like solving it, lol. I know it of course. And no, Anshul, I ain’t no chicken sh*t to be scared of it. I’m not little though. . Omark and Raptor and me are so close to the same age. You should focus on your English and not your Math skills. I don’t need some random guy telling me about my English. Don’t say I need to improve my English as typing here isn’t compared to my actual English class in school. If I am able to recall correctly, a year ago or so, you were probably one of the most immature people I have meant online. I doubt much has changed seeing your responses to people. You could easily end it by refraining from responding yet you persist. I want in on this quote pyramid. For fawks sake! I’m putting an end to this and give you the answer… It’s 5. Ok, 5. FIIIIIIIVE….. I would have guessed 42. I don’t know how to solve this, I have not learned it yet. It’s not that hard to say it :) Nobody builds a pyramid without a few bricks. Moar Pyramid. Ok, guys, so this is how it works: $\dpi{100} \fn_cm \sqrt[x+2]{\sum_{R=1}^{25} 5^x}=\sqrt[x+2]{5^x+5^x...+5^x} = \sqrt[x+2]{25*5^x}=\sqrt[x+2]{5^2*5^x} = \sqrt[x+2]{5^{x+2}}=5$ 1514 posts Originally posted by Tumalu:Originally posted by waraxe:Originally posted by Aaditya:Originally posted by The_Average_Nerd:Originally posted by Aaditya:Originally posted by RaptorKris:Aaditya, why did you not solve omarks equation thingy majig? Originally posted by omark96: Amendment #1 says Freedom of speech as one of its aspects. So, you can’t make my talk Anshul or Rappy. :p Also, maybe I just don’t feel like solving it, lol. I know it of course. And no, Anshul, I ain’t no chicken sh*t to be scared of it. I’m not little though. . Omark and Raptor and me are so close to the same age. You should focus on your English and not your Math skills. I don’t need some random guy telling me about my English. Don’t say I need to improve my English as typing here isn’t compared to my actual English class in school. If I am able to recall correctly, a year ago or so, you were probably one of the most immature people I have meant online. I doubt much has changed seeing your responses to people. You could easily end it by refraining from responding yet you persist. I want in on this quote pyramid. For fawks sake! I’m putting an end to this and give you the answer… It’s 5. Ok, 5. FIIIIIIIVE…..