Recent posts by karmakoolkid on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Challenges of Online Communication

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

This doesn’t include the bad results of meeting going on&on&on&on because the “little people” want to find a place in the sun by interjecting the most inane questions possible.
0¿~

Those people are more than welcome to ask the most inane questions possible. It might be tedious, but it’s the only way we can flush failings out of the system prior to full implementation. I will note however, that it’s only useful when the meeting is for a project we all have control on shaping; they’re pointless when none of us have any actual control over the minutae of the project.

Nah, they are welcome to realize that as “little cogs” in the overall machinery that they really likely don’t have anything significant to add…..esp. when it is just a rewording of what has already been said. See above in bold.

This is not to say that the “little ppl” can’t have really great ideas.
But, in the real world, if we “entertain” every one of them at meetings….
that is all that will EVER get accomplished…..MEETINGS.
Ya know, kinda like how govt. works.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Challenges of Online Communication

The only dumb question is the one that didn’t get asked and bad crap results?
This doesn’t include the bad results of meetings going on&on&on&on because the “little people” want to find a place in the sun by interjecting the most inane questions possible.
0¿~

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Vulgarity

Nicely put, IOD.
Ya covered nearly all of the nuances of cussing.
I would add that one might “explore” the use of alternative words;
words that convey the same thought;
but are so sophisticated that when being applied to/about someone;
that person is almost proud to be it.

Asshole = anal sphincter
Fucker = copula crazy
Prick = thorn-do
Shit = fecal
Go fuck yourself = charity begins at home
Eat shit & die = maketh thy last supper a hearty bowel full
Shut up = thouest cease-the-din (emphasized as: seize the day)
You are a piece of shit = you’re a lovely shade of FUBAR

Synonyms, the spice rack of communication.

And, dude…..I sooooo luv the “troll larvae” quip.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

Originally posted by Zachary_Greene:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Why not get rid of maid service at a hotel/motel?
The ppl who stay there for a day or two and make their own bed and clean their own toilet…..or NOT.

Why not?
Can you not have hotels that are, obviously, state-run, that have different qualities?
A cheap one with maid service costs .2 income, one without with only decent quality is .1, a fancy one is .3 without, .45 with…I see no reason to force maid service on someone who doesn’t want it, and can do just as good of a job.
Assuming you teach how to make a bead properly in schools, the individuals should be able to make the bed for the next fella.

If ya can say/think that, I can say there certainly is a lot you don’t know about ppl.
What one person considers clean for them self can be filthy as hell for the next person’s evaluation.
And, what a person will consider clean by the standards set forth can be quite a bit off from the intent of the rule.
People are people….very different among the lot of ‘em.
That is mostly why most attempts at communism don’t work.
That is why many of the 60’s communes I visited didn’t work out.

“The greatest wave of communal living in American history crested in the tumultuous 1960s era including the early 1970s. To the fascination and amusement of more decorous citizens, hundreds of thousands of mostly young dreamers set out to build a new culture apart from the established society that they believed was on a slippery slope to oblivion.”

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by thijser:
The only way I can see myself interacting w/ a pedo is in a therapy situation for him/them if there were to somehow be some benefit for me being there.

So if one of your friends told you he is a pedophile then you would inmidetly seice all contact? I hope you can see this makes it less likely that any of them will ever tell you, what do you prefer if you know exactly who is a pedofile or having no idea? Somewhere between 5% and 0.5% of all males is a pedofile which means that you will almost certainly know a number of them. I know I would prefer to know who is and who isnt’ a pedofile and then judge who to trust and who not to trust as I get to better know them.

Yes, I certainly could have been a lot clearer on that position. I was talking in a most general scenario.

But, specifically, were it a friend of mine, I would already know. Such is MY definition of what a friend is. AND YES, he would be in therapy, w/ me included in certain parts, so I would know as close as possible the exact status of his “condition”, not only for being around my kids, but for his activities that might have significant influence on our friendship. I don’t take friendship lightly.

Call it wanting to know if a gal has herpes BEFORE you have sex w/ her. I want to know if some guy that I’ve “allowed” to be around my kids isn’t “getting off” by being around them.
.

Stop at the level that it is harmfull to the child. Simple line as long as the kid doesn’t know anything and won’t realize anything later then no damage is done no matter intent (and if the intent is not there at all then no problem).
That has the potential to be soooooo wrong on several levels.
.
.
And, Kasic, if this is what you are getting from me: “It seems to me that you’re very clearly applying double standards, and also assuming that all men are potential rapists waiting for an opportunity.” … I won’t bother to show you just how idiotically wrong that is.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by Kasic:
I don’t care at all what the demeanor of a pedo, “pedo-lite” or otherwise, is, they are going to be knowingly around a child of mine….esp. alone. Have you not heard of pedo priests, Boy Scout leaders, Sunday school teachers, etc.?

I’m going to have to agree with Zachary on this point. Why would a pedophile be any more inclined to rape than another person? Simply having a sexual attraction doesn’t make people rapists at the first (or ever) opportunity. That shouldn’t differ between any preferences. I could just as easily say that I don’t care at all what the demeanor of a straight, “straight-lite” or otherwise, is, they are going to knowingly be around a woman (let’s be honest, you’re probably only talking about men here) alone. Have you not heard of cops, friends, college students, etc?

On the surface, Kasic, I’m in complete agreement w/ you & Zachary. In no way am I saying that because a person is a pedo that they are “automatically” a child rapist. That should be obvious. And, it should be just as obvious that I’m talking about prepubescent kids. I also abhor the “assumption-by-ignorance” stance that a Gay is automatically a pedo.

However, even if a gun had the same large number of chambers for bullets and the same (much?) smaller number of ANONYMOUS pedophiles who would rape, etc. were randomly placed in those chambers, I certainly wouldn’t put that gun to my child’s head and pull the trigger.
What? Does a known pedo have a certificate that says: I’m a pedo but a CERTIFIED non-raping one; but I don’t necessarily see it as rape if the child gives consent?

Remember, I’ve placed in my argument the position that I don’t know the “degree” of activation this pedophile has that is knowingly going to be around my child. But, that said, I’m not at all comfortable w/ “offering up” my child as some form of therapy for some pedo working his way through “controlling” his penchant for lust-0-children.

Kasic, I personally have no problem being around Gays in extremely intimate situations…showering, etc. They can lust for my body all they want. I’m an adult. I am fully (not as a child) in charge of my actions. Promise of a candy bar isn’t going to sway me. I can easily talk w/ Gays who express a sexual interest in sex w/ me. I will do the same for SOME women…kool women….women who are able to understand that interest should be confused w/ intent. And, believe it or not, most of them consider it a compliment….just as I do from most Gays’ interest.

What I’m not interested in is some pedo telling me he would like to see my kid naked.
And, w/o his talking much deeper than just “hey, I’m a pedo”, I won’t know the extent of his “interest”, and therefore, am going to be very uncomfortable about what is/MIGHT be going on in his head.

The only way I can see myself interacting w/ a pedo is in a therapy situation for him/them if there were to somehow be some benefit for me being there.

Kasic, would YOU allow a pedo friend to bounce your 3 y.o. on his lap or play “horsey” w/ your 5 y.o.? At what level of physical contact would ya begin to have concerns?

And, yes…I’ve heard of cops, friends, college students, etc. No need to drop belittling sarcasm on me. Not necessary to make your point. Hell, ya’re beginning to sound like ME.
LOL

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

That said, vika, do you think such a society would “encourage” a much stricter “control” of its population?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Zachary, I could have saved myself a lot of time/effort reading the above had I merely read the transgender thread first:

Originally posted by Zachary_Greene:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

How can ya be so sensible on this issue and be so ______ on the child porn one?
-BTW, that’s rhetorical.-


Because CP is a much touchier issue for people, as is pedo-stuff in general, so it’s more likely for you to agree with me on this, than other issues, even though both are not really exactly what the majority believes about said issues.
I mean, is there not a movement for one, and not the other?


I don’t, and never will take into account the what the majority say when the few say otherwise.

I think I’m beginning to want to make a call to NASA in Houston
.
I don’t care that according to most people pedos are evil child rapists who have no hearts because I have spoken to many online, and am friends with quite a few, and they say and show the complete opposite of that.
And there we have it.
I don’t KNOWINGLY know ANY pedos; let alone call them my friend, or even seek them online.
WHAT? There is some site called: #I’m a pedo, but I’m actually a really nice guy?

Actually, there is.
But, it’s not there in an effort to help promote “feely-good” about pedophilia. It is there for a different kind of help.

I don’t care at all what the demeanor of a pedo, “pedo-lite” or otherwise, is, they aren’t going to be knowingly around a child of mine….esp. alone. Have you not heard of pedo priests, Boy Scout leaders, Sunday school teachers, etc.? I would have to TRUST/understand a guy w/ my own life in very touchy situations in order to have the trust needed to allow them to be around my child

(snipped – stick to the argument, rather than the poster please)

I DO strongly believe there is a certain level, esp. the harsh legal penalties, of stigma surrounding the non-rape area of pedophilia that should be greatly less than it is. What the current attitudes about pedophilia does adds/creates for this stigma is prevent those who have this form of sexual-gratification for children from seeking help for what I see as simply having some odd brain “wiring”.

I won’t call it mental illness merely because it is something “different” that the brain tells pedos to do. I don’t see Gays as having mental illness; just a different brain wiring. Being Gay doesn’t involve sexual activity that involves children….CHILDREN. Are you able to understand CHILDREN?

I guess the (broader than economics) concept of supply & demand is something you aren’t able to apply to child porn, either. If there isn’t a demand for it, the supply won’t be there either.

This would include the simple supplying of “selfie-porn” sent to others. If the receiver isn’t interested to the point of informing the supplier that s/he is emphatically “not interested” right on up the scale to saying s/he will report them, the supply will likely dry up in that simple venue, too.

So, tell me, how is the demand for child porn going to be met if the supply doesn’t exist?
Believe me, any pedos that go to nudist resorts are soon ferreted out.
It takes a very sly pedo to fool us.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

Why not get rid of maid service at a hotel/motel?
The ppl who stay there for a day or two can make their own bed and clean their own toilet…..or NOT.
The toilet can just get so bad that the room will have to been offered at such a huge discount in exchange for someone willing to clean it & the room because no one is willing to use the room because of how filthy it is

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

BUT, as this link shows, that “auto 10 year sentence” might be a bit of a stretch. Any decent lawyer, using all of the loopholes the illegal access to computers offer, will show complete lack of intent. “Possession”…YES. Intent to possess….not likely.

It’s like how kids joyriding in a “stolen” car can’t be prosecuted for stealing it unless INTENT to keep it in their possession or sell it can be proven. Otherwise, it is merely depriving of property for a duration. Yeah, I know….crazy. And, the law has to prove that the kids even knew the vehicle was stolen: Yo officer, my bro told me to take this car and go get some smokes.

CHILDREN porn is rather obvious.
Young girls is another.
Some 18 y.o.’s can look like 12.
The law will have to prove that those pics are of ppl underage.

The best defense is to not have a computer or smart phone.
Just use a stone tablet & chisel, learn how to send smoke signals, Morse Code via tom-tom.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Good for your out.
NOW, I want Zachary to explain how there is going to be any wide-spread POSSESSION of ANY porn, including his non discretionary child porn, if there is NO making & distribution of it? I do realize there are going to be those who will break the law. Is that how an ARBITRARY control of it is going to be handled?

Then, why not make the possession of it illegal also?
Ya know, like it NOW is?
Cut off the demand, the supply dries up.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

vika, that’s not the point.
Zachary says it IS OKAY to have/possess child porn.
I’m wanting to know how he is going to manage that when he is TOTALLY against it being made & distributed.

There is a conflict in his positions….in his ideology.
What part of the cow/milk analogy is so hard to grasp.
I’m not talking about running in some goats.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

The person who takes the picture is then the one making & distributing child porn.
I, nor Zachary, excluded even the simplest, non-commercial producers.
“I do not support, and never would support the distribution of ANY porn, especially child porn, nor the production.”

The point I asked of Zachary: how are these ppl, whom he supports the right to have child porn of any age group, going to have that product which he supports them having but adamantly is against the manufacture/distribution of….in ANY way at all?

This is akin to saying ppl can have milk; but we are going to kill all of the cows.
Or maybe: let them eat cake?

It’s not really a trick question;
the trick will be in coming up w/ a good answer.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Transgender Individuals

How can ya be so sensible on this issue and be so ______ on the child porn one?
BTW, that’s rhetorical.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by Zachary_Greene:
, basically, ALL ages should be legal.

Legal to do what?
Give me some examples of what a 3 y.o. would be doing that is sexy?
Just be naked?
Engaging in sexual activity.
If porn is legal for ANY age, what is to keep someone from “going there”?
.

Saying that twelve is a cut off is just arbitrary as the current average of 15.8~ across the world.
Yes, you can argue that their parts are matured there, but to be quite honest, that really makes no difference whatsoever outside of having sex for babies, correct?
Then, if it makes no difference if the “parts” are there or not, what is the point of showing them?
Aha, got ya.
And, what the hell does an average age of the world population have to do w/ children being “sexually” naked?
.
Personally I don’t like pornography, and don’t use it, however, if you’re not going to impose a ban on ALL possession, you must not impose a ban on ANY of it without crossing the same arbitrary line.
Yes, that arbitrary line is called decency and barbarism……and, likely a host of others.
.
This being so, in my view, there’s no need to ban the possession of having “child pornography” of a 15year old, or a 7 year old, if you do not ban possession of porn of the average “teen” porn you see on the web, as well as “milf” porn.
The average teen is illegal here in the states. 18 y.o. isn’t the average. What does MILF have to do w/ child porn? Do you even know what MILF porn is?
.

I do not support, and never would support the distribution of ANY porn, especially child porn, nor the production. Gun down any ol’ bastard who even considers risking to hurt a child.

Here is where your point jumps the track of reality. If something can’t be “made” and passed around, how in hell is anyone going to have it? You do realize that even “homemade” child porn specifically for the viewing of the maker(s) is still considered “production”?
.

While I’d fight alongside people who have child porn in their possession, I would not someone distributing it or making it.
Tell me again, how do these ppl have child porn in their possession?
.
Also, before you accuse me of having child porn, think, if your friend seems like he may have child porn, but seems to love children like a good parent, and because of their attraction their porn is illegal, are you going to not only throw them in the oven, but also support the people who want to do so?
Seriously, do YOU not understand that ppl of similar thinking de facto do support each others thinking?

And, do YOU not see an issue w/ a person liking child porn and having children at their disposal?
.

The biggest issue I have supporting the average persons arguments is not only it being arbitrary as everything else, but the fact that from what people have told me, and what I can think of, a person who possesses it or has, or even has viewed it, would be petrified of their life.
The biggest issue I have supporting the average person’s arguments is not only drunk driving being arbitrary as everything else, but the fact that from what ppl have told me who have had someone killed/maimed by a drunk driver, and what I can think of, a person who drives drunk or has driven drunk, would be petrified for likely having an accident that would kill/main someone, and spend a very long time in prison.

Get the picture, NOW?
.

I just don’t think that’s right, regardless of who they are, especially when it’s just because of “my feelings.”
And, YOU are entitled to have that “feeling”.
Fortunately, YOUR feelings on the matter don’t much at all align w/ a very high percentage of 1st world societies’ feelings
MY feelings on it are similar to that drunk driving thing.
Of course, it could be because I had a nephew killed by a drunk driver.

So, tell me, how are YOU going to ensure that those who produce/distribute “children-of-porn” are going to be gunned down should any ’ol bastard who even considers risking to hurt a child? YOU do know who well America’s war on drugs is doing?
.

The real-real reason I don’t support it is because in most countries, because of the blind hatred most people have to pedos, they will jail anyone they suspect regardless of laws. Because of this, I could, you could, and almost anyone could be charged with child pornography because prosecutors can claim that image you saved of a child, or saw while browsing the net, was sexual to you, therefore can be classified as child pornography. Their case is even easier if the child is partially naked or topless, which isn’t really that uncommon if you have baby pictures from your childhood, or from your family, or you simply saw an innocent picture on facebook of someones newborn, or someone linked you to a “legal” nudist site.
Why put the most cogent part of your point in small print?
Why are you taking about the arbitrariness of degrees of nakedness/topless?
.
Basically, fuck the police state.
I keep my computer and electronics fully encrypted and have memorized the password because I NEVER want to be charged with some bullshit just because someone wants to silence me or they dislike me for something I did, be it in real life, online, through a game, through a school, or through the government.
Not even once.
.
To wrap up, basically, I’m paranoid, fuck the government, and I dare you to poke a single hole in my argument.
The classics.
Yes, YOU are.
And, I’d be very careful about who/where ya spout your ideology on child porn because someone might “poke a hole” in your argument AND YOU, too.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:
Originally posted by Aleazor:

There are a lot of people who would like to justify pornography as a liberated woman’s independent choice, but as we all very well know, these girls are seduced by the money, drugs, and empty promises of scumbags who want to exploit them. No matter how we dress it up, there is nothing classy about being a whore. The laws are in place to keep girls from prostituting themselves before they are old enough to fully realize the serious ins and outs of the industry.

http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2005/11/suicide_girls_e

Suicide Girls’ exodus

by Jess McCabe // 23 November 2005, 09:32

Ya got anything a little more recent?
Sure, things a decade ago weren’t rosy.
But, there’s newer issues wrought from those old ones that require attention.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / The age to appear in porn is 18, but the average world age of consent is 16

Aleazor, would you then see a much greater need for monitoring the industry; esp. in this area?
Linda Lovelace of Deep Throat later expressed her experience as being the very points you mention.
“Linda Boreman’s allegations[edit]
In her first two biographies, Linda Boreman characterized having made the film as a liberating experience; in her third and fourth biographies, both of which were written after she had come out with her stories of sexual abuse, rape, and forced prostitution in the porn business, she charged that she had not consented to many of the depicted sexual acts and that she had been coerced to perform by her abusive then-husband Chuck Traynor, who received $1,250 for her acting. She also claimed that Traynor threatened to kill her, brandishing handguns and rifles to control her.”

You bring up “being a whore” as being “nothing classy”. Are you against prostitution of any sort? Of course, were it to be legal & well regulated, what age would then be appropriate for such work?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Communism Vs. Capitalism

But, a “myth” that is well propagated by a very large amount of ppl just the same.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

Originally posted by thijser:

By the way vikaTae I thought about how you could improve the wrist detection system: in the Nederlands they are currently running tests using camera’s that detect aggressiveness in voices, these camera’s turn on when someone is being aggressive close to these camera’s.

LOL, I can see doggy shock collars that control barking for ppl.
Elevated, angry, aggressive language AND….ZAP, tased.
But, maybe not such a bad idea in some cases.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Corporal Punishment

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by Kasic:
It would have been a far simpler solution if they were allowed to grab the kid’s arm and wrestle the lighter out of the kid’s possession without ending their own career in the process.

That’s far different than corporal punishment.

Not really. It still comes under the header of staff may never cause physical damage to a kid ever. No matter the justification they think they have in the spur of the moment.

Then that form of guidelines for staff over children is a few sandwiches short of a good picnic, too. That certainly shouldn’t be considered relevant to the discussion of corporal PUNISHMENT. There was no punishment involved. the physicality was a matter of IMMEDIATE safety.

don’s example of punctuating a corrective measure w/ a SIMPLE, non-“lethal” swat on the behind is very akin to what I’ve stated as being well within the realm of reasonable. Something that has to be considered there is the psychology involved.

For the swat to have any real impact importance to the child, it has to be associated by the child as an event of some level of negativity. If there isn’t really any pain, where is the negativity? I’m NOT saying there has to be great pain; just something more than what the child would perceive as dirt being brushed from their clothes.

The lesson learned, if there actually is going to be even a hint of one learned, is going to come from the rarity of the action imparted by the parent; and more importantly, the perceived, by the child, demeanor of the parent as they give that swat.

That body language (& intonation of the voice) is something that is easily learned by the very young. If it isn’t taught well, what can one expect of a child’s behavior? Likely just a life that is fraught w/ all hell breaking loose at any given, unsuspecting moment.

A child at an early age develops a capability to know the differences of approval & disapproval by their parents of their actions.. THAT is what should be focused on, the swat is merely the rim shot.

The swat should cause the child see that the situation was very serious & to think about & remember the incident that led up to the swat; not focus on the horrors of a “beating” as the prime preventive for incorrect behavior.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Mcdonalds Employee (Advice Please)

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Corporal Punishment

Originally posted by RollerCROWster:

hitting kids is good because it builds character!!

i think ppl should it kids more bkuz then they will have more character

parents should grind their kids character value to lvl 100

Oddly enough, CROW, ya really aren’t all that far off.
At least this is the opinions I often hear from my the generation above me.
There certainly wasn’t this psychological fuzzy-feel-good attitude back in their day.
No, the “spare-rod-spoil-the-child” was the norm.
There were many stories of: dad would tell me to go cut a willow branch and if I didn’t bring back one he approved of, he would whip me w/ that one and send me back to get a better one and whip me w/ that one, too.

Perhaps I’m saying that there is a very strong precedence for the child “SPANKING” crowd?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun issues updates

If we apply to guns the same efforts we have to a lot of things, I have no doubt that we will be able to come up w/ some ways to have much greater safety involving usage of guns….eps. pistols.

Until then, for the safety of children, the trigger locks and combination lock boxes will have to do.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Corporal Punishment

Originally posted by petesahooligan:
And, YOU don’t do the same thing?

So much for trying to add anything substantive to the conversation with Karma in the room. Karma, could you try at least sometimes to not be such a dipshit? I was actually agreeing with you. If you weren’t so hyper-sensitive to every perceived insult to your fragile ego, you may have noticed that.

LOL, I so luv how those who insult aren’t able to realize it is they who are usually the instigators and far worse at doing what they accuse others of being/doing. I certainly don’t (rarely?) use the language pete uses. I mange to clothe my bile in “soft words” like vika does. Otherwise, it likely will be deleted….DUH. Then there is Jan, LOL.

pete, if you so desire to take the high road by agreeing w/ me, WHY THE FUCK precede it w/ some dumbass clarifying statement that such agreement is an anomaly? “Although I maintain my personal dislike for KarmaKoolKid’s hyperbolic assault on ideas he doesn’t agree with, I fully support his position in this matter.”
.

Originally posted by petesahooligan:

I’m happy to yield this awesome forum to Karma. Have fun, y’all.

Drama queen much?
.
Speaking of drama queens:
Originally posted by Jantonaitis:
Ah it’s not so bad. His writing style and mammoth post-rants make it easy to just tune out his tantrums.
What a pot-stirrer this child beater luvs to be. LOL
It’s odd how he so often touts the lack of merit for reading my posts; yet does enough to believe he can make meritorious assessments. What is even more odd is how obsessive he is about me.

Oooops, I must stop this carrying heated bitches from thread to thread because Jan vehemently disagrees w/ me about how to live my life and isn’t at all ashamed to make a complete ass of himself in doing so. LOLOLOLOLOL
.

Originally posted by Kasic:

Yes, Karma will carry things from thread to thread and forever beat you over the head about them if you ever try to disagree/criticize him.

A weeebit hyperbolic there, aren’t we? I wonder why. You certainly are much smarter than that.

As you state it, it lends an easy assumption that such is my constant modus operandi: “…if you EVER TRY to disagree/criticize him.”

I’m not like some dipshits who will keep a library of things they are “offended” by so they can use them later. Why did YOU not jump in and chastise Jan when he said he does? Why do you not similarly chastise him when he makes above comments. I don’t record things I find a bit off the bubble from being a saint. But, I’m able to know that your halo is a bit singed, Kasic, when it comes to such behavior that you’ve branded me with.

Hell, I can say the same about you. This is at least the second time you’ve carried from one thread to another this critique to beat me over the head with. Ergo, I can also say: “carry things from thread to thread….”. You and I sharply disagreed over Feminism. Do I carry any resentment from thread to thread w/ YOU? Why would I be such an ass to someone that I’m somewhere in the thigh 90 percentile in agreement with on issues?

If you wanted to “console” poor impugned pete, you always have the option of doing so in a shout or PM. All you are doing here is what vika does: piggy-back your insult on someone else’s. What, is there some kind of “safety in numbers” for giving validity to opinions?

Just a clarification here, posters actually do manage to disagree/criticize me. And, much the very same as I’ve seen YOU do, Kasic, I will hotly defend my point; especially when it is against bigoted, prejudiced, unjust actions against innocent ppl. Ppl who manifest such behavior as thinking it is okay to BEAT children and wives most definitely will taste my scorn.