Recent posts by Yuipon on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by doomteen17:

the flood idia smells of bs as if it was real wec would find fish and over sea life foshols on every bloody montin. and probly in your own back yard ect

Please tell me that either A) your hands suffer from uncontrollable spasm syndrome or B) your primary language is something other than English.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by MyTie:

Oh look, another “Christianity is wrong because” thread. I was feeling a little neglected, not having my beliefs shat on all day.

Originally posted by WiiHugger:

Last post then I need to go to bed.
I haven’t read the entire thread, but if you are saying it is false due to no evidence of the ark, then I say that the wood probably rotted away long ago.

I recall reading an article that mentioned that they may have found Noah’s Arc. What remained of it fit the dimensions in the Bible, and they found evidence of many species in it including hairs, droppings, etc. If you care to look at it, just search for it. Of course, it may be a hoax, or even false hope. I don’t know what to think of it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by beauval:


Of course, I’m a Christian, but I’m having my doubts. I’m desperately clinging to anything that I can to hold on to this faith, because I like some of its ideas.

You sound a lot like me forty years ago. Liking some of Christianity’s ideas, and some of them are, to be fair, pretty cool, does not mean that you have to embrace the whole religion, nor does it mean that you have to believe in God at all. Perhaps it’s time to let go and move on, as I did.

Unfortunately, the idea I find most appealing is the “afterlife” one, which of course is not easy to embrace if I don’t believe in it. I can’t think of better way of saying this… let me see. So, I like many of the ideas that Christianity provides us with, but amongst those is Heaven, and afterlife. If my favorite concept that Christianity had to offer was “do unto others as you would have them do to you,” then I would have no problem removing Christianity from my life. I could continue to live out that idea, regardless of wether or not it was associated with Christianity. What I’m saying is that you can be kind with out having to be part of a religion. But thats not the only idea I like. I like the idea of Heaven. And as fate would have it, I can’t go to Heaven unless A) Christianity is more fact than faith and B) I believe in this faith. I still don’t know if you followed, but thats as well put as I can manage.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / is killing yourself cowardly

Originally posted by Retneug:

Killing yourself can sometimes be extremely brave depending on the context.

For example, on a recent good show called “Arrow”, the main character’s father kills himself and another man on a lifeboat because there isn’t enough food left for all three of them. Thus he gives his son, the only other passenger and the one most likely to survive, the best chance at life that he possibly can.

And there’s always throwing yourself on a grenade to protect your buddies.

But yeah, if you just kill yourself for personal reasons I’d say you’re cowardly in most cases. Notable exceptions are victims of severe trauma of all kinds, such as extreme violence or sexual abuse, and people who are looking forward to a slow/excruciating death otherwise.

I could not agree with you more. But what is your opinion on people who are being bullied? I personally think that suicide in the case of a victim of a bully is still cowardly, as cruel as it sounds. I think suicide is a very permanent solution to an often temporary problem. But what is the suicide of the victim the bully’s fault? If so, then is the bully or the victim cowardly? If not, then how could the victim have stopped their inevitable suicide?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by tenco1:

Welcome to SD, you must be new here.

I didn’t know SD existed until like 3 hours ago.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by TheKnifeGrinder:
Originally posted by ktrout42:

Did Jesus fake his own death only to “reappear” several years later and gain notoriety and fame? Was he a street magician, much like David Blaine? Or did he really turn wine into water and come back from the dead? Please discuss, I’m interested in what you all think.

Christian religion per se ain’t a bad thing, it predicates love,compassion,peace.. the fanatics like you are the problem.

Just wondering, how was the author of the post a fanatic? I don’t know if he commented, but as for the question, it seemed pretty unbiased.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by tenco1:
Originally posted by Yuipon:

I don’t understand how that is “the Bible answer.”Where in the Bible does it say “God made the universe look older than it is?”

Because it… Isn’t.

It’s really just head-in-the-ground fanatics trying to justify all the evidence that the universe is billions of years old doesn’t actually contradict the Bible. In doing so, though, they make God into a decieving douche-nugget.

I didn’t think it said anything about that in the Bible. I was looking for a more grounded response to the light-year idea. That being said, you don’t need to trash-talk the head figure of a major religion. I think if atheists and Christians could quit calling each other unintellectual narrow-minded assholes, we could get farther in this discussion. For a topic that started off with some good ideas, it quickly evolved into name calling and finger pointing, and that is just sad.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Originally posted by dd790:
Originally posted by Yuipon:

Don’t be discouraged by the length of this reply, if you care to find an answer, then read this.
Light, stars, and basic mathematics seem to disprove the Bible.
A light year is not a time, but rather a distance. It is representative of how long light travels in a year. One light-year therefore equals about 5.88 trillion miles (9.46 trillion kilometers). This means that if a new star was created 11.76 trillion miles away from Earth, over the course of a year, the light will only have traveled 1/2 the distance to Earth. Using this fixed time of travel that light follows, astronomers have calculated that the Earth is no less than hundreds of millions of years old, which is contrary to the 6,000 year idea presented by the Bible and Jesus’ lineage.
It stands to reason that the Creator of the Universe may have, whilst unravelling the universe, unravelled light in such a distance that it would seem the light took millions of billions of years to reach us, but I am starting to doubt Christianity, even though I am Christian.
If you care to further your knowledge on the topic of light-year time calculation, just search something along the lines of “light year stars disprove bible”.

God made the universe to look older than it is, but didn’t do this to deceive us

Makes no sense, I know, but that is the Bible answer to your post.

I don’t understand how that is “the Bible answer.” Where in the Bible does it say “God made the universe look older than it is?” Of course, I’m a Christian, but I’m having my doubts. I’m desperately clinging to anything that I can to hold on to this faith, because I like some of its ideas. And here is where I stand with this whole thing; I will hear you or anyone else out on almost everything, but I don’t want bullshit (not to say your reply to me was bullshit, just lacking support). I want stuff backed by logic or reason. Wether that logic is based on the assumption that the Bible is fact, or wether it was based on the assumption the Bible is all lies, I don’t care.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Did Jesus fake his own death?

Don’t be discouraged by the length of this reply, if you care to find an answer, then read this.
Light, stars, and basic mathematics seem to disprove the Bible.
A light year is not a time, but rather a distance. It is representative of how long light travels in a year. One light-year therefore equals about 5.88 trillion miles (9.46 trillion kilometers). This means that if a new star was created 11.76 trillion miles away from Earth, over the course of a year, the light will only have traveled 1/2 the distance to Earth. Using this fixed time of travel that light follows, astronomers have calculated that the Earth is no less than hundreds of millions of years old, which is contrary to the 6,000 year idea presented by the Bible and Jesus’ lineage.
It stands to reason that the Creator of the Universe may have, whilst unravelling the universe, unravelled light in such a distance that it would seem the light took millions of billions of years to reach us, but I am starting to doubt Christianity, even though I am Christian.
If you care to further your knowledge on the topic of light-year time calculation, just search something along the lines of “light year stars disprove bible”.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Post your best/favorite strategy!! -Posted by Yuipon

(Times on action bar) [Times upgraded] This one is best until about half way through Zone ‘Hew’: *•Free Will(x2)[4/4] •Corruption(x1)[1/1] •Epiphany(x1)[4/4] •Electric Storm(x1)[4/4] •Psychopath Form(x1)[1/1] •Insecurity(x1)[3/3]•Traumatize(x1)[2/2]

This is how it should work:
0) Epiphany does not get removed when you use Corruption
1) Cast insecurity
2) Use Epiphany
3) Cast Corruption until Epiphany runs out
4) Corruption’s and Free Will keep you away from death!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Post your best/favorite strategy!! -Posted by Yuipon

(Times on action bar) [Times upgraded] OK its not the greatest but its what I do: bold Class>>>{Psychological} {Combat Action Bar}>>> •Nightmare(x1)[4/4] •Shock Coma(x1)[2/3] •Retrograde(x1)[2/2] •Epiphany(x1)[4/4] •Free Will(x1)[4/4] •Shock Therapy(x2)[3/3] •Electrical Storm(x1)[4/4] bold

So, heres how this should go:
0) Choose 1 target.
1) Use Nightmare
2) Use Shock Coma
3) Use Retrograde
4) Wait until Retrograde runs out by attacking a different target/skipping your turn
5) Use Epiphany
6) Use your other skills to survive and fight!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Why Sonny 2 was an abomination, and why Sonny 3 should not be made

Originally posted by Theoria:
“Sonny 1 was a great game with a original perspective: Being hunted by a zombie because of ignorance. It stuck to the roots of flash gaming by keeping it simple.

Sonny 2 was an utter failure, attempting to fix it’s numberous plotholes and adding in a storyline that is cryptic at best. Out of all the horrible dialogue, what do we learn? There’s a conspiracy to make money. Sonny 2 completely went against the original in that it was made in the prospect that more complicated = better. A muddled soundtrack, overblown graphic updates (waste of time), horrible and disorganized dialogue, very disorganized skill systems made this game an ABSOLUTE MESS to play.

If Jakrin continues, he may very well go against the principles that made Sonny 1 so great and create new monstrosities. As much as I love sonny (And I do like Jakrin, Sonny, and somewhat have a liking for Sonny 2) I can’t bear to see wasted effort. More likely than not Sonny 3 WILL probably be even more confused and build upon the flaws of sonny 2.

Not to mention, adding new classes, skills, graphics, music will take ages (several years) and will be for naught, because it’s all wrong. And honestly, multiplayer & co-op are some really unreasonable requests (to name a few) that have been suggested which might take inexistent budgets and months to create.

Feel free to trash my opinion or add your own. Keep in mind I’m not saying Sonny 2 is not a BAD GAME, I’m saying it was an abomination in the way that it unnecessarily veered from it’s original success, and if this continues, Sonny 3 will be a game that falls flat on it’s ass for trying too hard."
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOOOO,… let me get this straight… Sonny2 was worse than Sonny1 because the graphics were better? and he improved most everything from Sonny1 and put it all in Sonny2… yet… Sonny2 was worse? Ok well if you agree with Theoria and understand what he means, please tell me. Im curious on how Sonny2 (which is Sonny1 with better classes and graphics and pretty much everything better) is WORSE than Sonny1. The only thing I agree with Theoria about these games is Sonny1 was great.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Why Sonny 2 was an abomination, and why Sonny 3 should not be made

ye connor, i agree about that 1/5 rating… WTF does he rate other games? .00000000000012/5?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Why Sonny 2 was an abomination, and why Sonny 3 should not be made

NEW QUESTION!!! Why the crap does anyone care if there is money involved? Its a great game and someone is getting money!!! Its a “win-win situation”.

 

Topic: Sonny 2 / Why Sonny 2 was an abomination, and why Sonny 3 should not be made

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Sonny 2 / Post your best/favorite strategy!! -Posted by Yuipon

OK guys :D post ur greatest strategy! Make sure to name what class though!