Recent posts by Puppenmaedchen on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Pack calculations] Average Cost of Legendaries

Originally posted by purei:

http://tyrant.40in.net/kg/card.php?id=291 agrees with 3.25%

as a side note, this is > 12% chance to get at least one from 4 packs, so the 10% from buying in a tourney is worse if you’re angling for a legendary (but definitely better if you’re looking for a rare.)

how do you think its better? You stay at 3.25% as chances of independent events are not added up. So to me 1 chance of 10% sounds better then 4 chances at 3.25%

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [Event Planning] Want a deck suggestion?

I would also like to see if you had any improvement ideas. I just got the points to buy 1 cannon wall and went from your other ideas in the thread. Dunno if Fusion Silo instead of Bunker would improve it, or remove an anti-fear option and leave me too wide open for that. My fansite link

Thank you in advance!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [NEWS FLASH] Berzerkers disbanded/catfaced

Well I for one was in Berzerks and I am no alt of any WB-player whatsoever. I just woke up and saw wjat happened, so I didn’t have time to qq and I do not see a reason to do so. Either it will be resolved in a way that helps us or not – there is nothing I could influence by qq-ing so I am waiting for whats to come. If I can do anything useful then I will, but as I said – qq wont help.

PS: I’ve been in Berz for over 6 months now and was never asked to share my password with anyone, nor have I been confronted with any (at least to me) obvious acc sharing. So saying one should’ve known is not really helpful, especially with all the mudthrowing during the last months. 

Originally posted by Sabroso84:

I would feel much sorrier for them if they weren’t a faction full of alts from a top-faction.
-
Notice the lack of QQing from the members of the faction, they all have mains they can still play and won’t have any trouble finding slots in other factions for their alts.
-
I do feel sympathy for those who weren’t alts in Bz, so to the hand-full of you out there, my condolences go out to you.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / is it me or is moya really hard to get

Bought 2 packs, received 2 Moya.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Tyrants Club 2nd Annual Birthday Raffle

Originally posted by Agroagro:
Copy of planescape torment desliq,

That is the best price of all tbh :D

and congratulations to the winners :)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / [SPOILER] New Worldship cards! Pictures and Stats: No need to click links!

Well there is an 8 HP refresh, summon on attacked unit that on top augments all summoned units rally 1 and weaken 1. the step you don’t want to experience isn’t that huge anymore tbh.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Tyrants Club 2nd Annual Birthday Raffle

Happy Birthday TC!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

Originally posted by Scaler_:
Originally posted by Puppenmaedchen:

I couldn’t find a post on how to merge the updates, that’s what I was really asking, even if I probably phrased it wrong. Sorry ’bout that.

First post: “https://github.com/leftylink/tyrant_optimize/archive/leftylink-integration.zip – This is the source code distribution that contains all my changes. It is automatically updated at the same URL whenever I update the leftylink-integration branch.”

Really, just trust me that I actually can read and checked the thread and the links. Download the file you linked and check the date. That is the Dec. 03 release. Everything that was fixed/updated/implemented later (Dec. 19 release) is not in there – that is why I am asking how to get the updates merged. /sigh

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

Originally posted by Kyrossian:
Originally posted by Puppenmaedchen:

Which branch do I have to compile to have quests, effects, emulate and on kill effects available? I do not understand how this branching on github works and which files I need to recompile to get updated. I would really appreciate any help there.

The post catepillar posted still works as far as instructions go.

I couldn’t find a post on how to merge the updates, that’s what I was really asking, even if I probably phrased it wrong. Sorry ’bout that.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

Which branch do I have to compile to have quests, effects, emulate and on kill effects available? I do not understand how this branching on github works and which files I need to recompile to get updated. I would really appreciate any help there.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

Originally posted by catepillar:

My guess would be that ogre-spam isn’t defined as a deck. Try using QVH0+q instead of “ogre-spam”. Also climbing with 10 is near useless. For meaningful data, you need at least 10,000.

Well it doesn’t matter which Deck I use as the attack deck – it never finds the “Step X” decks that correspond with the quests as defending decks. Deck Hash instead of Deck Name does not fix the problem either. And I know that for meaningful data a climb of 10 is useless – as you can see a few posts above that I usually use higher numbers. It was just to see if any flags caused the problem. I’ll try debugging later on, just had a quick glimpse in the thread before heading off to work.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

I tried it with -q right after the decks, but it didn’t help. tyrant_optimize “ogre-spam” “Step 1” -q climb 10 – didn’t help either. And I recompiled a few times and ended up with no success as well. And I checked if I did the deck name thingy by mistake, but no deck with step in the name is listed in custom.txt.

I tried on Win XP32 and on Win Vista64 SP2

Guess I’ll stick to my old exe for the time being.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization - leftylink's thread

I downloaded the integration .zip-file today and recompiled it. The new .exe that was created does not recognize queststeps anymore. using the old .exe (I compiled on Dec 04) with the same bat-file it does optimize versus quests.

The error message is this:

The deck Step 1 was not found. Available decks:
[then it lists all Mission, Raid and Custom decks]

It is the same for all Steps.

The quest.xml is in the folder of the .exe.

Edit: just to make sure, this is the command line that I use:

tyrant_optimize “timesurgeopak” “Step 1” -o -r -q -t 1 climb 100000 > TimeSurgeOpak.txt (with correct version of the " of course)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization

Thank you lefty, after creating the directory and adding -lboost_chrono it worked perfectly. Now gonna try it out.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Automatic deck optimization

I tried to compile your newest branch with the toolchain aapje linked, but as I am not too much of a professional in that matter, I hit a roadblock of error messages that I do not understand:

If anyone could elaborate and help me out, I’d appreciate it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Xeno Dominaton Special Event: which extra cards to get?

not on turn 3? its aug on play right?

edit: ah I get it, you counted like tyrant, I counted only own turns.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Miscrits / Not working

Does not load for me either :(

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Evaluate Decks (game simulator)

Seems like the xml files were the problem. After updating them I get exactly your posted results. Thank you for helping me here patiently. Its appreciated!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Mimic in Haunt conquests

The description in the game is not correctly stating what it does game mechanic wise. The game mechanic is Summon X (BT Assault) on death.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Evaluate Decks (game simulator)

Originally posted by Pr3470r14n:
Originally posted by Puppenmaedchen:

@grrrmpf Seed does not really help:


D:\IterateDecks>iteratedecks-cli.exe —seed -n 100000 QVBmBqCtJeD5Dw+iC6EDAo SnL
CLfLHDhDnIMIPKBKyGrFag/g+
Games won: 100000 / 100000
Games lost: 0 / 100000
Games drawn: 0 / 100000
estimator=1.0000 confidence [0.9999;1.0001]Assertion failed!
Program: D:\IterateDecks\iteratedecks-cli.exe
File: CLI2/cliSimulate.cpp, Line 485
Expression: uBound <= 1
This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application’s support team for more information.
D:\IterateDecks>pause

Now what’s my machine doing different compared to your machines mindboggle

Which version of the program are you using?
Can you check whether this still happens in the latest version? (I can see from the error message that you are not using the latest version.)
What is your exact operating system? XP? Vista? Windows 7/8? Home? Professional?

I used the version: windows(mingw32) alpha 598a58fcd8ed65b0dc5923ca7bc8cf02da06e729 extracted onto a clean new extract of http://evaluatedecks.googlecode.com/files/EvaluateDecks_v30.zip under WinXP Professional Version 2002 SP3

and this is what I get with the new version:

D:\IterateDecks>iteratedecks-cli.exe —seed -n 100000 QVBmBqCtJeD5Dw+iC6EDAo SnL
CLfLHDhDnIMIPKBKyGrFag/g+
Games won: 100000 / 100000
Games lost: 0 / 100000
Games drawn: 0 / 100000
estimator=1.0000 Assertion failed:
upper == 1.0000602348904213 <= 1.0000000000000000 == 1 in file CLI2/cliSimulate.
cpp:357(void EvaluateDecks::CLI::twoSidedBounds(unsigned int, unsigned int, doub
le, double&, double&))
Stacktrace not available. Not supported on your platform?
Thats YOUR chance to do something for us: Implement it.

D:\IterateDecks>pause

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Evaluate Decks (game simulator)

@grrrmpf Seed does not really help:


D:\IterateDecks>iteratedecks-cli.exe —seed -n 100000 QVBmBqCtJeD5Dw+iC6EDAo SnL
CLfLHDhDnIMIPKBKyGrFag/g+
Games won: 100000 / 100000
Games lost: 0 / 100000
Games drawn: 0 / 100000
estimator=1.0000 confidence [0.9999;1.0001]Assertion failed!
Program: D:\IterateDecks\iteratedecks-cli.exe
File: CLI2/cliSimulate.cpp, Line 485
Expression: uBound <= 1
This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application’s support team for more information.
D:\IterateDecks>pause

Now what’s my machine doing different compared to your machines mindboggle

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Evaluate Decks (game simulator)

D:\IterateDecks>iteratedecks-cli.exe -n 100000 QVBmBqCtJeD5Dw+iC6EDAo SnLCLfLHDh
DnIMIPKBKyGrFag/g+
Games won: 100000 / 100000
Games lost: 0 / 100000
Games drawn: 0 / 100000
estimator=1.0000 confidence [0.9999;1.0001]Assertion failed!

Program: D:\IterateDecks\iteratedecks-cli.exe
File: CLI2/cliSimulate.cpp, Line 485

Expression: uBound <= 1

This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application’s support team for more information.

D:\IterateDecks>pause

I tried everything I could think of, but I am not sure what the issue is. Maybe you could help me with that? I use the latest version available.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / Post your Terminus pack results here!

Blessed Reckoner sigh

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / "Purple Flash" continues recruiting

I just reached lvl 30 today, started playing about 3 weeks ago, so I find it pretty competitive to keep up with the decks of no u guys in this war.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Tyrant: General Tyrant Discussion / "Purple Flash" continues recruiting

Hm, completely missed out on that one because of organizing moving to a new town in two weeks :(