Recent posts by Hoschisack on Kongregate

Topic: Tyrant / [Recrutement] La guilde francophone 'The Best of The Noob' recrute !

@gabriel & jerome: nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! just kidding :P

was about time that we get a french speaking faction good luck to you :D

Topic: Tyrant / DRAGONS is recruiting

Originally posted by ManuelDevil:

Originally posted by crazyeye2011:

Originally posted by ManuelDevil:

posting a war screenshot is so 2011.

you may post one yourself when you score more than 2800 points against top7 factions^^!

so i had to screen every war? boring
(during that war i was sleeping)

No during that war you were rescuing princess peach or eating a pizza.

on topic: join dragons :]

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Flashpoint Expansion Announcement!

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Regarding Faction Levels

Originally posted by OOHnirav:

Originally posted by Hoschisack:

Personally I dont care too much about faction level rewards (if they are as bad as the current ones). I know a lot of players need some sort of goal to work towards thats why this change is probably really bad. I can see quite some players leave topfactions because of having no such goal (even if the goal are just crappy cards).

Also the whine of cq players is pathetic. I always said that cq players should get a way to obtain the faction level reward cards aswell. This “you broke my toy so I want to break your toy aswell” way of thinking is childish and sad. Specially if you consider the fact that the cq players toy was broken from the start.

Why do we always have to remove rewards instead of makeing sure players of each part of the game can receive rewards from both parts of the game?

I’m not sure where to start here. Should I mention that no one suggested breaking faction wars? Or that one of the people who never actually conquested seems to think he can properly determine how broken it is? Or how about the blatant strawman (and irony) in all of his whining about childishness and such?

Naw, if I do any of that, he’ll probably call himself a whale and threaten to quit again unless factions start getting CR for winning wars. Enjoy easy mode.

im not even going to start arguing with an indian dwarf cq whiner – but nice try :]

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Regarding Faction Levels

Personally I dont care too much about faction level rewards (if they are as bad as the current ones). I know a lot of players need some sort of goal to work towards thats why this change is probably really bad. I can see quite some players leave topfactions because of having no such goal (even if the goal are just crappy cards).

Also the whine of cq players is pathetic. I always said that cq players should get a way to obtain the faction level reward cards. This “you broke my toy so I want to break your toy aswell” way of thinking is childish and sad. Specially if you consider the fact that the cq players toy was broken from the start.

Why do we always have to remove rewards instead of makeing sure players of each part of the game can receive rewards from both parts of the game?

Topic: Tyrant / in good old tyrant...

Atlas + Spells

Topic: Tyrant / [survey for vets/hardcores] Question 2

Originally posted by purei:

when vets started playing the fansite didn’t exist, or was in its infancy. or maybe, they’re still around because they don’t use the fansite-shortcuts and so they haven’t burned out with the unquenchable heat of an inorix.

i used the fansite for raids/mission for a few months, but now i’m finding enjoyment in wasting energy to figure out a good deck. wasting 80+ energy per attempt is admittedly painful though.

Topic: Tyrant / [survey for vets/hardcores] Question 2

I never use the fansite for solutions to missions or raids.

Topic: Tyrant / [Visual Glitch] Persistent Immobilize

Originally posted by Redlaw:

Originally posted by Hoschisack:

Originally posted by stormcommando:

Happens a lot with jam. Just refresh. Looks like you won anyways. Lol and you gave away you have an alt named urtoast.

he renamed to urtoast :]

Pics or it didn’t happen :]

Topic: Tyrant / [Visual Glitch] Persistent Immobilize

Originally posted by stormcommando:

Happens a lot with jam. Just refresh. Looks like you won anyways. Lol and you gave away you have an alt named urtoast.

he renamed to urtoast :]

Topic: Tyrant / [BUG?] Flare of Courage Cleanse

Topic: Tyrant / raid honor should be decreasing everyday to encourage ppl doing raids

yea force us to redo another part of the game we dont enjoy (=raids) good idea… NOT!

Topic: Tyrant / [To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...

FEU !!!

Topic: Tyrant / [D.P] I Have A Complaint Which I Would Like To Be Fixed (Relatively) Quick

Originally posted by 00craigs:

Originally posted by darkfang77:

Observe. Meteor. A marginally useful card.

Observe closely.

See the dead pixel-like thing near the nose?

Is this deliberate? Or some kind of card problem, it looks irritatingly like a dead pixel whenever I play it on my screen, I examine it, it stands out too much from the card to look like a normal part of the card and it looks too square.

Devs clarify, and if neccesary, fix.

Timer starts now.

Why did I read this! Now I cannot stop seeing the dead pixel :(

+1 dead pixels everywhere !!!!

Topic: Tyrant / Gutless + wars

@kkk: I agree for most non alliance factions in the top is has probably become worse. For us in ZP it was a lot worse 4-6 months ago (but I always say the constant double wars was something that really made us strong).

Topic: Tyrant / [D.P] I Have A Complaint Which I Would Like To Be Fixed (Relatively) Quick

I liked how DaWayne went for the obvious DP joke :]

Topic: Tyrant / Most Important Part of Tyrant

Originally posted by undeadify:

3) The factions, faction wars, and tile conquests.

I love surging and finding new surge decks without any simulators, optimizers or without useing decks that work for others.

Topic: Tyrant / Gutless + wars

you guys act as if getting a defense war from a friendly faction of the faction you attack is something new.

Topic: Tyrant / [DEV] Worldship Missions Released!

Originally posted by Cid84:

Still waiting for hoschi to post that he is done :>

Updates while I am on an airplane are evil. Thats the reason it took me a bit longer but done now ;-)

Topic: Tyrant / [To Veterans] Do Any of You Remember Your First Faction

Originally posted by metalforlife1:

Ducktales, wikingz, TC, and then some Merc factions that I don’t remember

Ducktales nice I remember them beeing one of Cloud 9’s first ‘allies’ while climbing up the ranks :)

Topic: Tyrant / Conquest vs Faction Wars - How conquest got totally useless

About the topfactions takeing tiles away from the conquest map at least speaking for ZP it was all about who gets to level 20 first and after MoM took #1 with conquesting we had to keep up to remain on #1. I personally always voted to keep out of conquest but I can understand some of my factionmates that it sucks loseing #1 just because other factions take tiles :]

also what shadevarr said:

Originally posted by shadevarr:

if conquest didnt give any FP, I bet those 357 tiles would not have been taken.

Topic: Tyrant / sold my cards: quit

grats :)

Topic: Tyrant / Conquest vs Faction Wars - How conquest got totally useless

Originally posted by Sabroso84:

Originally posted by Clanard:

All valid points. Problem is the more people complain the more the Devs are inclined to listen (sadly) and the worse the game gets. Result: Players leaving, Factions quitting.

I have to disagree. The quantity of complaints has nothing to do with it.
-
Players that spend $1000’s on WarBonds (1% of Tyrant population), get their every whim catered to. If you are one of those 1% that pay the DEV’s mortgages, you get whatever you want (or apparently only half of their suggestion in this case), all you have to do is QQ and threaten to quit the game and POOF.
-
It takes Thousands of average players to make up for one player who spends $1000’s, thus, they get what they want and everyone else can go jump in a lake. It’s a business…

Not sure where you pull out your fairy tales but they are completely wrong :]

You saw me complaining that invading in conquest is way too easy and that defense needed a boost in so many threads and still devs didnt do anything about it. I got so much positive support about the conquest change that I can live with a few haters who think I stole their lollipop np :]

Topic: Tyrant / Conquest vs Faction Wars - How conquest got totally useless

Originally posted by inorix:

Originally posted by anyrotmg:

Ideally I think CQ shouldn’t be forced on the players. Let those players who enjoy CQ CQ, and those who enjoy war war.

We agree on this, however now factions can’t really do conquest even if they like it (while still caring about FP.) Even WB who is raging all over the map without competition now can’t get 8 tokens yet, while a lot of factions get it granted for launching 2 farms. WB players put in hours of effort every single day, can’t just stam dump like all the pro “war factions”. It’s so very just and fair now, TY again hoschi.

Disclaimer: WB doesn’t care about tokens and FP. That’s why we still conquest despite changes. But we are very unhappy that all our competition got a backdoor way out of getting annihilated. ;]

Ehhhhhm go reread my suggestion please. If the developpers implemented my sugggestion properly then the leader in the CR ranking would become the max tokenreward. Please dont blame me for devs implementing only half of my suggestion :/

Topic: Tyrant / Vote for the Best Faction in Tyrant History

Originally posted by Sighaknight:

Originally posted by Hoschisack:

Originally posted by Sighaknight:

Originally posted by Deedle:

LoA might of been the strongest at some point in time, but when we refer to legit factions and non-warbonded wars they wouldn’t be tops.

LoA had a non-wb agreement with IFS for a while, and we wrecked them twice a day for a few weeks. Also don’t see how LoA was less legit than IFS and mom.

LoA would ‘wreck’ IFS for the sole reason because LoA was too low fp wise to be worth fighting back (or attacking with an offense war). Also IFS did their 80k+ score (pre 300 Stamina) without cheating.

That’s weird, IFS declared on LoA multiple times. And if we weren’t worth your trouble, why would you even have cared about a non-wb agreement. You’re not making sense.

It’s well known that there was absolutely no cheating in IFS. And all members rode their unicorns over the rainbow to feed the starving children of Ethiopia atleast once a week.

We knew exactly a no wb agreement would hurt us short time but we still agreed to it to ensure that you would not be able to pass us long term. This makes sense for anyone who played at the top long enough. With a no wb agreement and teams on a similar strengh (and without conquest) the team that attacks usually wins the war. For you we were the best target fp wise but we had better targets fp wise for most of the time. To me it makes all sense really :]

ps: if what I say wasnt true why was it LoA that cancelled the no wb agreement with IFS once you rose up the ranks enough for us to profit from attacking you? If you were really that much better why would you cancel the no wb agreement?